IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/2r98w_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Digital discretion and public administration in Africa: Implications for the use of artificial intelligence

Author

Listed:
  • Plantinga, Paul

Abstract

African public administrations are in an especially difficult position with respect to the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI), both in how they harness its benefits but also in managing potential harms. Through a systematic narrative review of previous research, this paper synthesises findings from previous digital government implementations on the African continent, and considers the implications for AI use. Four considerations emerge as relevant: Integrity of recommendations provided by decision-support systems, including how they are influenced by local organisational practices and the reliability of underlying infrastructures; Inclusive decision-making that balances the (assumed) objectivity of data-driven algorithms and the influence of different stakeholder groups; Exception and accountability in how digital and AI platforms are funded, developed, implemented and used; and a Complete understanding of people and events through the integration of traditionally dispersed data sources and systems, and how policy actors seek to mitigate the risks associated with this aspiration.

Suggested Citation

  • Plantinga, Paul, 2022. "Digital discretion and public administration in Africa: Implications for the use of artificial intelligence," SocArXiv 2r98w_v1, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:2r98w_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/2r98w_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/61ddcc98cba0080137d73563/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/2r98w_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maréve Inge Madlyn Biljohn & Liezel Lues, 2020. "Citizen Participation, Social Innovation, and the Governance of Local Government Service Delivery: Findings from South Africa," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(3), pages 229-241, February.
    2. Kuziemski, Maciej & Misuraca, Gianluca, 2020. "AI governance in the public sector: Three tales from the frontiers of automated decision-making in democratic settings," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(6).
    3. Aurélien Buffat, 2015. "Street-Level Bureaucracy and E-Government," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 149-161, January.
    4. Goldsmith, Arthur A., 2001. "Foreign Aid and Statehood in Africa," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 55(1), pages 123-148, January.
    5. Ryan Brunette & Jonathan Klaaren & Patronella Nqaba, 2019. "Reform in the contract state: Embedded directions in public procurement regulation in South Africa," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 537-554, July.
    6. Carmen Antón & Carmen Camarero & Rebeca San José, 2014. "Public Employee Acceptance of New Technological Processes: The case of an internal call centre," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(6), pages 852-875, September.
    7. Kevin P. Donovan, 2015. "The Biometric Imaginary: Bureaucratic Technopolitics in Post-Apartheid Welfare," Journal of Southern African Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(4), pages 815-833, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Plantinga, Paul, 2022. "Digital discretion and public administration in Africa: Implications for the use of artificial intelligence," SocArXiv 2r98w, Center for Open Science.
    2. Thierry Kangoye, 2008. "Instability from trade and democracy: the long-run effect of aid," Post-Print hal-00331902, HAL.
    3. Zhang, Weidong & Zuo, Na & He, Wu & Li, Songtao & Yu, Lu, 2021. "Factors influencing the use of artificial intelligence in government: Evidence from China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    4. Tan Yigitcanlar & Rashid Mehmood & Juan M. Corchado, 2021. "Green Artificial Intelligence: Towards an Efficient, Sustainable and Equitable Technology for Smart Cities and Futures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-14, August.
    5. Youngcheoul Kang & Nakbum Choi & Seoyong Kim, 2021. "Searching for New Model of Digital Informatics for Human–Computer Interaction: Testing the Institution-Based Technology Acceptance Model (ITAM)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-36, May.
    6. Ann-Sofie Isaksson & Dick Durevall, 2023. "Aid and institutions: Local effects of World Bank aid on perceived institutional quality in Africa," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 523-551, July.
    7. Kangoye, Thierry, 2011. "Does Foreign Aid Promote Democracy?," WIDER Working Paper Series 064, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    8. Plümper, Thomas & Neumayer, Eric, 2009. "Famine Mortality, Rational Political Inactivity, and International Food Aid," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 50-61, January.
    9. Simone Dietrich & Joseph Wright, 2012. "Foreign Aid and Democratic Development in Africa," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2012-020, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    10. Huiying Zhang & Zijian Zhu, 2024. "Mobile Government Service Promotion Strategies: Exploring Sustainable Development Pathways Based on Provincial Government Practices in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-21, August.
    11. Albert Sanchez-Graells, 2024. "Resh(AI)ping Good Administration: Addressing the Mass Effects of Public Sector Digitalisation," Laws, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, February.
    12. Montes-Rojas, Gabriel V., 2013. "Can Poor Countries Lobby for More US Bilateral Aid?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 77-87.
    13. Maekawa, Wakako, 2024. "United Nations peacekeeping operations and multilateral foreign aid: Credibility of good governance," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    14. Thierry Kangoye, 2011. "Does Foreign Aid Promote Democracy?," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2011-064, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    15. Shet, Sateesh V. & Pereira, Vijay, 2021. "Proposed managerial competencies for Industry 4.0 – Implications for social sustainability," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    16. Tchouassi Tchouassi, 2013. "Are Trade Liberalization and Democracy Driving Development in Central Africa Region? Empirical Lessons," Journal of Social and Development Sciences, AMH International, vol. 4(3), pages 131-140.
    17. Carl Jan Willem Schudel, 2008. "Corruption and Bilateral Aid," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 52(4), pages 507-526, August.
    18. Joao Ricardo Faria & Daniel Arce, 2018. "On the Samaritan’s Dilemma, Foreign Aid, and Freedom," Economies, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-17, October.
    19. Chih-Hao Yang & Yen-Yu Liu & Chia-Hsin Chiang & Ya-Wen Su, 2023. "National IoMT platform strategy portfolio decision model under the COVID-19 environment: based on the financial and non-financial value view," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 328(1), pages 1151-1179, September.
    20. Atabek Atabekov, 2023. "Public Functions Implementation by Artificial Intelligence: Current Practices and Prospects for Common Measures within Particular Periods across Continents and Regions," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-24, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:2r98w_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.