IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v66y2021ics0160791x21001500.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors influencing the use of artificial intelligence in government: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Weidong
  • Zuo, Na
  • He, Wu
  • Li, Songtao
  • Yu, Lu

Abstract

Some studies have discussed the potential and challenges related to the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in government. However, there are few empirical studies that have examined factors that influence the use of AI in government. By collecting policy documents and empirical data from the government, IT enterprises, and the public in China, we identified the influencing factors in the three stages of government adoption, implementation, and decision-making. The research results show that the influencing factors of government application of AI are different at different stages and with different stakeholders’ backgrounds.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Weidong & Zuo, Na & He, Wu & Li, Songtao & Yu, Lu, 2021. "Factors influencing the use of artificial intelligence in government: Evidence from China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:66:y:2021:i:c:s0160791x21001500
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101675
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X21001500
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101675?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Desouza, Kevin C. & Dawson, Gregory S. & Chenok, Daniel, 2020. "Designing, developing, and deploying artificial intelligence systems: Lessons from and for the public sector," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 205-213.
    2. Kuziemski, Maciej & Misuraca, Gianluca, 2020. "AI governance in the public sector: Three tales from the frontiers of automated decision-making in democratic settings," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(6).
    3. King, Gary & Pan, Jennifer & Roberts, Margaret E., 2013. "How Censorship in China Allows Government Criticism but Silences Collective Expression," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 107(2), pages 326-343, May.
    4. Buhmann, Alexander & Fieseler, Christian, 2021. "Towards a deliberative framework for responsible innovation in artificial intelligence," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    5. Ostheimer, Julia & Chowdhury, Soumitra & Iqbal, Sarfraz, 2021. "An alliance of humans and machines for machine learning: Hybrid intelligent systems and their design principles," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    6. Gansser, Oliver Alexander & Reich, Christina Stefanie, 2021. "A new acceptance model for artificial intelligence with extensions to UTAUT2: An empirical study in three segments of application," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    7. Robinson, Stephen Cory, 2020. "Trust, transparency, and openness: How inclusion of cultural values shapes Nordic national public policy strategies for artificial intelligence (AI)," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    8. Fernandes, Eduardo & Holanda, Maristela & Victorino, Marcio & Borges, Vinicius & Carvalho, Rommel & Erven, Gustavo Van, 2019. "Educational data mining: Predictive analysis of academic performance of public school students in the capital of Brazil," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 335-343.
    9. Paul Henman, 2020. "Improving public services using artificial intelligence: possibilities, pitfalls, governance," Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(4), pages 209-221, October.
    10. Li, Jian & Huang, Jin-Song, 2020. "Dimensions of artificial intelligence anxiety based on the integrated fear acquisition theory," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    11. Cubric, Marija, 2020. "Drivers, barriers and social considerations for AI adoption in business and management: A tertiary study," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ayman Batisha, 2023. "A lighthouse to future opportunities for sustainable water provided by intelligent water hackathons in the Arabsphere," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Hossain, Mokter, 2022. "The Shenzhen ecosystem: What it means for the western world," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    3. Johnson, Nathan & Turnbull, Benjamin & Reisslein, Martin, 2022. "Social media influence, trust, and conflict: An interview based study of leadership perceptions," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    4. Saeed Badghish & Yasir Ali Soomro, 2024. "Artificial Intelligence Adoption by SMEs to Achieve Sustainable Business Performance: Application of Technology–Organization–Environment Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-24, February.
    5. Duygan, Mert & Fischer, Manuel & Ingold, Karin, 2023. "Assessing the readiness of municipalities for digital process innovation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    6. Yang, Siying & Liu, Fengshuo, 2024. "Impact of industrial intelligence on green total factor productivity: The indispensability of the environmental system," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    7. Uzir, Md Uzir Hossain & Al Halbusi, Hussam & Lim, Rodney & Jerin, Ishraq & Abdul Hamid, Abu Bakar & Ramayah, Thurasamy & Haque, Ahasanul, 2021. "Applied Artificial Intelligence and user satisfaction: Smartwatch usage for healthcare in Bangladesh during COVID-19," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    8. Kumar, Shashank & Raut, Rakesh D. & Queiroz, Maciel M. & Narkhede, Balkrishna E., 2021. "Mapping the barriers of AI implementations in the public distribution system: The Indian experience," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kumar, Shashank & Raut, Rakesh D. & Queiroz, Maciel M. & Narkhede, Balkrishna E., 2021. "Mapping the barriers of AI implementations in the public distribution system: The Indian experience," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    2. König, Pascal D. & Wenzelburger, Georg, 2021. "The legitimacy gap of algorithmic decision-making in the public sector: Why it arises and how to address it," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    3. Tan Yigitcanlar & Rashid Mehmood & Juan M. Corchado, 2021. "Green Artificial Intelligence: Towards an Efficient, Sustainable and Equitable Technology for Smart Cities and Futures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-14, August.
    4. Zhang, Lixuan & Yencha, Christopher, 2022. "Examining perceptions towards hiring algorithms," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    5. Hangl, Johannes & Krause, Simon & Behrens, Viktoria Joy, 2023. "Drivers, barriers and social considerations for AI adoption in SCM," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    6. Yu-Che Chen & Michael J. Ahn & Yi-Fan Wang, 2023. "Artificial Intelligence and Public Values: Value Impacts and Governance in the Public Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-22, March.
    7. Rocco, Salvatore, 2022. "Implementing and managing Algorithmic Decision-Making in the public sector," SocArXiv ex93w, Center for Open Science.
    8. Mariani, Marcello M. & Machado, Isa & Magrelli, Vittoria & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2023. "Artificial intelligence in innovation research: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future research directions," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    9. Rodney Duffett & Rodica Milena Zaharia & Tudor Edu & Raluca Constantinescu & Costel Negricea, 2024. "Exploring the Antecedents of Artificial Intelligence Products’ Usage. The Case of Business Students," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 26(65), pages 106-106, February.
    10. Rongbin Yang & Santoso Wibowo, 2022. "User trust in artificial intelligence: A comprehensive conceptual framework," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 2053-2077, December.
    11. Noha Diab & Nicoleta Isac & Cosmin Dobrin, 2022. "Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Jobs: The Impact of Pandemic on Governmental Organizations in Istanbul - Turkey," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 23(1), pages 46-64, March.
    12. Kulkov, Ignat, 2021. "The role of artificial intelligence in business transformation: A case of pharmaceutical companies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    13. Bratanova, Alexandra & Pham, Hien & Mason, Claire & Hajkowicz, Stefan & Naughtin, Claire & Schleiger, Emma & Sanderson, Conrad & Chen, Caron & Karimi, Sarvnaz, 2022. "Differentiating artificial intelligence activity clusters in Australia," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    14. Leopoldo Fergusson & Carlos Molina, 2020. "Facebook Causes Protests," HiCN Working Papers 323, Households in Conflict Network.
    15. Guriev, Sergei & Treisman, Daniel, 2020. "A theory of informational autocracy," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    16. Sergei Guriev & Daniel Treisman, 2020. "The Popularity of Authoritarian Leaders: A cross-national investigation," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03878626, HAL.
    17. Gianluca MISURACA & Colin van Noordt, 2020. "AI Watch - Artificial Intelligence in public services: Overview of the use and impact of AI in public services in the EU," JRC Research Reports JRC120399, Joint Research Centre.
    18. Erin Baggott Carter & Brett L. Carter, 2021. "Propaganda and Protest in Autocracies," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 65(5), pages 919-949, May.
    19. Salih Tutun & Marina E. Johnson & Abdulaziz Ahmed & Abdullah Albizri & Sedat Irgil & Ilker Yesilkaya & Esma Nur Ucar & Tanalp Sengun & Antoine Harfouche, 2023. "An AI-based Decision Support System for Predicting Mental Health Disorders," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 1261-1276, June.
    20. Xiukang Wang, 2022. "Managing Land Carrying Capacity: Key to Achieving Sustainable Production Systems for Food Security," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:66:y:2021:i:c:s0160791x21001500. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.