IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iza/izadps/dp17233.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Sharing Is Caring: Employee Stock Ownership Plans and Employee Well-Being in U.S. Manufacturing

Author

Listed:
  • Adrianto, Adrianto

    (University of Minnesota)

  • Ben-Ner, Avner

    (University of Minnesota)

  • Sockin, Jason

    (Cornell University)

  • Urtasun, Ainhoa

    (Universidad Pública de Navarra)

Abstract

Do employees fare better in firms they partly own? Examining workers' reviews of their employers on Glassdoor, we compare employee satisfaction between firms in which workers own company shares through an employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) and conventional firms in which they do not. Focusing on workers in U.S. manufacturing, we find employees report greater satisfaction in employee-owned firms overall and with specific aspects of jobs such as firm culture. This satisfaction premium is greater when the ESOP is the product of collective bargaining or employees own a larger stake of firm equity. Employee well-being can thus differ by ownership arrangement.

Suggested Citation

  • Adrianto, Adrianto & Ben-Ner, Avner & Sockin, Jason & Urtasun, Ainhoa, 2024. "Sharing Is Caring: Employee Stock Ownership Plans and Employee Well-Being in U.S. Manufacturing," IZA Discussion Papers 17233, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
  • Handle: RePEc:iza:izadps:dp17233
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://docs.iza.org/dp17233.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ESOP; job satisfaction; collective bargaining; culture;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J52 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining - - - Dispute Resolution: Strikes, Arbitration, and Mediation
    • J28 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Safety; Job Satisfaction; Related Public Policy
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iza:izadps:dp17233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Holger Hinte (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/izaaade.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.