IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ita/itaman/02_04.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Diagnose von Fehlerquellen und methodische Qualität in der sozialwissenschaftlichen Forschung [Sources of Bias and Quality of Data in Social Science Research]

Author

Listed:
  • Andreas Diekmann

Abstract

Surveys supply us with the statistical data for economic and administrative decisions.Errors in survey research may lead to wrong and costly decisions. For a better control of the quality of research, methodological standards and validity criteria should be communicated more clearly. In this paper, sources of bias in interviews, sampling, and data analysis are discussed. An often neglected sorce of bias is the fraudulent manipulation of data. How can faked data be detected? In a final section new tests using the Benford distribution are explored. However, more research is needed to ascertain the validity of Benford tests. -- Umfragen liefern heute das Zahlenmaterial für wirtschaftliche und administrative Entscheidungen sowie sozialwissenschaftliche Untersuchungen. Fehler können dabei teuer zu stehen kommen. Der per Befragung erhobene IFO-Geschäftsklima-Index zum Beispiel hat nach Bekanntgabe unmittelbaren Einfluss auf den Kurs des Euro. Media-Analysen entscheiden über die Verteilung umfangreicher Werbebudgets. Und Irrtümer bei der Ermittlung des Preisindex wirken sich auf zahlreiche Verträge aus, die direkt oder indirekt mit dem Index verkoppelt sind. Die Sicherung methodischer Qualität und Transparenz bezüglich der Gütekriterien von Erhebungen ist daher eine nachdrückliche Forderung. In dem Vortrag werden Fehlerquellen bei der Befragung, der Stichprobenziehung und der Datenanalyse aufgezeigt sowie Möglichkeiten zur Behebung zumindest einiger typischer Fehlerquellen vorgeschlagen. Dabei wird auch das Thema betrügerischer Datenmanipulationen angesprochen. Zur Diagnose von Datenfälschungen wurden in jüngster Zeit Testverfahren entwickelt, die sich allerdings noch in der Erprobungsphase befinden. Diese Verfahren und ihre Anwendungsmöglichkeiten werden abschließend vorgestellt.

Suggested Citation

  • Andreas Diekmann, 2002. "Diagnose von Fehlerquellen und methodische Qualität in der sozialwissenschaftlichen Forschung [Sources of Bias and Quality of Data in Social Science Research]," ITA manu:scripts 02_04, Institute of Technology Assessment (ITA).
    • Handle: RePEc:ita:itaman:02_04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://epub.oeaw.ac.at/ita/ita-manuscript/ita_02_04.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Georg Aichholzer, 2002. "Das ExpertInnen-Delphi: methodische Grundlagen und Anwendungsfeld ‘Technology Foresight‘ (The Expert Delphi: Methodology and Application in 'Technology Foresight')," ITA manu:scripts 02_01, Institute of Technology Assessment (ITA).
    2. Georg Aichholzer, 2001. "Delphi Austria - An Example of Tailoring Foresight to the Needs of a Small Country," ITA manu:scripts 01_02, Institute of Technology Assessment (ITA).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Schräpler Jörg-Peter, 2011. "Benford’s Law as an Instrument for Fraud Detection in Surveys Using the Data of the Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP)," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 231(5-6), pages 685-718, October.
    2. repec:bla:germec:v:11:y:2010:i::p:397-401 is not listed on IDEAS

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gunther Tichy, 2002. "Informationsgesellschaft und flexiblere Arbeitsmärkte [Information society and flexible labour markets]," ITA manu:scripts 02_03, Institute of Technology Assessment (ITA).
    2. Jörg Flecker & Sabine Kirschenhofer, 2003. "IT verleiht Flügel? Aktuelle Tendenzen der räumlichen Verlagerung von Arbeit [Do information technologies (IT) give wings? Tendencies of the spatial relocation of work]," ITA manu:scripts 03_01, Institute of Technology Assessment (ITA).
    3. Gunther Tichy, 2002. "Over-optimism Among Experts in Assessment and Foresight," ITA manu:scripts 02_05, Institute of Technology Assessment (ITA).
    4. Helge Torgersen & Jürgen Hampel, 2001. "The Gate-Resonance Model - The interface of policy, media and the public in technology conflicts," ITA manu:scripts 01_03, Institute of Technology Assessment (ITA).
    5. Graber, Petra, 2006. "Ein Subsidiaritätstest – Die Errichtung gentechnikfreier Regionen in Österreich zwischen Anspruch und Wirklichkeit," ITA manu:scripts 05_02, Institute of Technology Assessment (ITA).
    6. Hilmar Westholm, 2002. "Mit eDemocracy zu deliberativer Politik? Zur Praxis und Anschlussfähigkeit eines neuen Mediums ]Is eDemocracy leading to a deliberative policy? On practice and connectivity of a new medium]," ITA manu:scripts 02_06, Institute of Technology Assessment (ITA).
    7. Michael Nentwich, 2003. "Neue Kommunikationstechnologien und Wissenschaft – Veränderungspotentiale und Handlungsoptionen auf dem Weg zur Cyber-Wissenschaft [New communication technologies and science and research -- potential," ITA manu:scripts 03_03, Institute of Technology Assessment (ITA).
    8. Walter Peissl, 2002. "Surveillance and security - a dodgy relationship," ITA manu:scripts 02_02, Institute of Technology Assessment (ITA).
    9. Aschemann-Witzel, Jessica & Perez-Cueto, Federico J.A. & Niedzwiedzka, Barbara & Verbeke, Wim & Bech-Larsen, Tino, 2012. "Transferability of private food marketing success factors to public food and health policy: An expert Delphi survey," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 650-660.
    10. Ian Belton & Kerstin Cuhls & George Wright, 2022. "A critical evaluation of 42, large‐scale, science and technology foresight Delphi surveys," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(2), June.
    11. Gunther Tichy & Walter Peissl, 2001. "Beeinträchtigung der Privatsphäre in der Informationsgesellschaft [Detraction of Privacy in the Information Society]," ITA manu:scripts 01_01, Institute of Technology Assessment (ITA).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Methodenprobleme; Gütekriterien; Fehlerquellen; Ausschöpfungsquote; Datenfälschung; Benford-Gesetz;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ita:itaman:02_04. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Werner Kabelka (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ioeawat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.