IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ita/itaman/02_06.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Mit eDemocracy zu deliberativer Politik? Zur Praxis und Anschlussfähigkeit eines neuen Mediums ]Is eDemocracy leading to a deliberative policy? On practice and connectivity of a new medium]

Author

Listed:
  • Hilmar Westholm

Abstract

Information and communication technologies are increasingly used for supporting citizens' participation. With reference to the model of deliberative policy shown at the example of an online consultation and other eDemocracy tools, this contribution investigates whether the use of new technologies can improve democratic procedures so that the communication among the people concerned and thus the rational discourse before decision-making is positively influenced. As an important prerequisite for the use of new technologies in citizen participation processes, the term "connectivity" is introduced which means that these technologies may not only be evaluated from the technical point of view; in consideration of legal, organisational, cultural and political criteria, it has to be checked if they fit into the provided environment. -- Informations- und Kommunikationstechnik wird in zunehmendem Maße auch zur Unterstützung von Bürgerbeteiligung verwendet. Der Beitrag untersucht unter Bezugnahme auf das Modell deliberativer Politik beispielhaft an einer Online-Konsultation und anderen eDemocracy-Tools, ob der Einsatz neuer Technik demokratische Verfahren dahingehend verbessern kann, dass die Kommunikation unter den Beteiligten und damit der rationale Diskurs vor der Entscheidung positiv beeinflusst wird. Als wesentliche Voraussetzung für den Einsatz neuer Technik in Bürgerbeteiligungsprozessen wird der Begriff der „Anschlussfähigkeit“ eingeführt, wonach diese Techniken nicht nur aus technischem Blickwinkel beurteilt werden dürfen, sondern zudem unter rechtlichen, organisatorischen, ökonomischen, kulturellen und politischen Gesichtspunkten zu prüfen ist, ob sie in die vorgesehene Umgebung „passen“.

Suggested Citation

  • Hilmar Westholm, 2002. "Mit eDemocracy zu deliberativer Politik? Zur Praxis und Anschlussfähigkeit eines neuen Mediums ]Is eDemocracy leading to a deliberative policy? On practice and connectivity of a new medium]," ITA manu:scripts 02_06, Institute of Technology Assessment (ITA).
    • Handle: RePEc:ita:itaman:02_06
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://epub.oeaw.ac.at/ita/ita-manuscript/ita_02_06.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Georg Aichholzer, 2002. "Das ExpertInnen-Delphi: methodische Grundlagen und Anwendungsfeld ‘Technology Foresight‘ (The Expert Delphi: Methodology and Application in 'Technology Foresight')," ITA manu:scripts 02_01, Institute of Technology Assessment (ITA).
    2. Georg Aichholzer, 2001. "Delphi Austria - An Example of Tailoring Foresight to the Needs of a Small Country," ITA manu:scripts 01_02, Institute of Technology Assessment (ITA).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gunther Tichy, 2002. "Informationsgesellschaft und flexiblere Arbeitsmärkte [Information society and flexible labour markets]," ITA manu:scripts 02_03, Institute of Technology Assessment (ITA).
    2. Andreas Diekmann, 2002. "Diagnose von Fehlerquellen und methodische Qualität in der sozialwissenschaftlichen Forschung [Sources of Bias and Quality of Data in Social Science Research]," ITA manu:scripts 02_04, Institute of Technology Assessment (ITA).
    3. Jörg Flecker & Sabine Kirschenhofer, 2003. "IT verleiht Flügel? Aktuelle Tendenzen der räumlichen Verlagerung von Arbeit [Do information technologies (IT) give wings? Tendencies of the spatial relocation of work]," ITA manu:scripts 03_01, Institute of Technology Assessment (ITA).
    4. Gunther Tichy, 2002. "Over-optimism Among Experts in Assessment and Foresight," ITA manu:scripts 02_05, Institute of Technology Assessment (ITA).
    5. Helge Torgersen & Jürgen Hampel, 2001. "The Gate-Resonance Model - The interface of policy, media and the public in technology conflicts," ITA manu:scripts 01_03, Institute of Technology Assessment (ITA).
    6. Graber, Petra, 2006. "Ein Subsidiaritätstest – Die Errichtung gentechnikfreier Regionen in Österreich zwischen Anspruch und Wirklichkeit," ITA manu:scripts 05_02, Institute of Technology Assessment (ITA).
    7. Michael Nentwich, 2003. "Neue Kommunikationstechnologien und Wissenschaft – Veränderungspotentiale und Handlungsoptionen auf dem Weg zur Cyber-Wissenschaft [New communication technologies and science and research -- potential," ITA manu:scripts 03_03, Institute of Technology Assessment (ITA).
    8. Walter Peissl, 2002. "Surveillance and security - a dodgy relationship," ITA manu:scripts 02_02, Institute of Technology Assessment (ITA).
    9. Aschemann-Witzel, Jessica & Perez-Cueto, Federico J.A. & Niedzwiedzka, Barbara & Verbeke, Wim & Bech-Larsen, Tino, 2012. "Transferability of private food marketing success factors to public food and health policy: An expert Delphi survey," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 650-660.
    10. Ian Belton & Kerstin Cuhls & George Wright, 2022. "A critical evaluation of 42, large‐scale, science and technology foresight Delphi surveys," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(2), June.
    11. Gunther Tichy & Walter Peissl, 2001. "Beeinträchtigung der Privatsphäre in der Informationsgesellschaft [Detraction of Privacy in the Information Society]," ITA manu:scripts 01_01, Institute of Technology Assessment (ITA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ita:itaman:02_06. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Werner Kabelka (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ioeawat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.