IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipg/wpaper/2019-003.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Rejoindre L?entreprise Familiale et Y Rester? Une Analyse du Contrat Psychologique Entre Employés Non-Familiaux et Entreprise Familiale

Author

Listed:
  • Julia Vincent Ponroy
  • Julia Vincent Ponroy

Abstract

Les entreprises familiales jouent un rôle important dans les économies de tous les pays. Le cas du Mittlestand allemand en est un exemple criant. Aider ces entreprises à se développer est un enjeu majeur. Or ne bénéficiant ni de l?image de marque et de la notoriété des grands groupes, ni de la dimension stimulante des start-up en cours de lancement, ces entreprises souffrent parfois d?un manque d?attractivité voire d?une difficulté à retenir les talents externes à la famille. Dans ce contexte, la théorie du contrat psychologique peut offrir un éclairage très utile. En effet, défini dans les grandes lignes comme le contrat caractérisant la relation seule à seule qui lie un employé à son organisation ou à l?individu qui la représente, le contrat psychologique est connu pour avoir une influence majeure sur l?intention de rejoindre une entreprise mais aussi sur les comportements des employés et notamment sur leur engagement et leur intention de départ. À cet égard, il est étonnant que les rouages du contrat psychologique liant les employés non- familiaux (managers et non-cadres) à l?entreprise familiale n?aient pas encore été étudiés. Le présent travail se propose de combler cette lacune en examinant les raisons qui conduisent les employés non-familiaux, en particulier les managers, à rejoindre l?entreprise familiale et à y rester : ces employés viennent-ils chercher dans l?entreprise familiale quelque chose de particulier et si oui, quelles sont donc les composantes du contrat psychologique qu?ils passent avec l?entreprise ? Les résultats de l?étude exploratoire que nous avons conduite auprès d?une entreprise familiale confirment que les entreprises familiales génèrent des attentes et promesses spécifiques, et que le contrat psychologique passé entre les employés non familiaux et l?entreprise familiale est clef pour renforcer l?attractivité de ces entreprises, l?engagement des collaborateurs et limiter leur intention de départ. Ces résultats sont discutés.

Suggested Citation

  • Julia Vincent Ponroy & Julia Vincent Ponroy, 2019. "Rejoindre L?entreprise Familiale et Y Rester? Une Analyse du Contrat Psychologique Entre Employés Non-Familiaux et Entreprise Familiale," Working Papers 2019-003, Department of Research, Ipag Business School.
    • Handle: RePEc:ipg:wpaper:2019-003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://faculty-research.ipag.edu/wp-content/uploads/recherche/WP/IPAG_WP_2019_003.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Seeck, Hannele & Parzefall, Marjo-Riitta, 2010. "From HRM to psychological contracting - the case of Finnish mobile content producing companies," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 33031, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Seeck, Hannele & Parzefall, Marjo-Riitta, 2010. "From HRM to psychological contracting - the case of Finnish mobile content producing companies," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 49811, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Sylvie Guerrero, 2005. "La mesure du contrat psychologique dans un contexte de travail francophone," Post-Print halshs-00005805, HAL.
    4. Pascal Paille & Nicolas Raineri & Patrick Valéau, 2016. "The Effects of the Psychological Contract among Professional Employees Working in Non-Professional Organizations," Post-Print hal-01450828, HAL.
    5. Rafael La Porta & Florencio Lopez‐De‐Silanes & Andrei Shleifer, 1999. "Corporate Ownership Around the World," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 54(2), pages 471-517, April.
    6. Tim Barnett & Franz W. Kellermanns, 2006. "Are We Family and Are We Treated as Family? Nonfamily Employees’ Perceptions of Justice in the Family Firm," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 30(6), pages 837-854, November.
    7. Antoine Pennaforte, 2012. "Engagement organisationnel et contrat psychologique : une relation en mutation chez les apprentis de l'enseignement supérieur dans le monde des services," Post-Print hal-02103151, HAL.
    8. Isabel C. Botero & Christopher Graves & Jill Thomas & Tomasz A. Fediuk, 2012. "Recruitment challenges in family firms: the effects of message content and type of applicant on organisational attractiveness," International Journal of Management Practice, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(4), pages 343-360.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julia VINCENT PONROY & Patrick LÊ & Camille PRADIES, 2019. "In a Family Way? A Model of Family Firm Identity Maintenance by Non-Family Members," Working Papers 2019-015, Department of Research, Ipag Business School.
    2. Waterwall, Brian & Alipour, Kent K., 2021. "Nonfamily employees’ perceptions of treatment in family businesses: Implications for organizational attraction, job pursuit intentions, work attitudes, and turnover intentions," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 12(3).
    3. François Belot & Timothée Waxin, 2017. "Labor Conflicts in French Workplaces: Does (the Type of) Family Control Matter?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 146(3), pages 591-617, December.
    4. Reddy, Krishna & Wellalage, Nirosha Hewa, 2023. "Effects of family ownership and family management on the performance of entrepreneurial firms," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    5. Botero, Isabel C., 2014. "Effects of communicating family ownership and organisational size on an applicant's attraction to a firm: An empirical examination in the USA and China," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 5(2), pages 184-196.
    6. Hanqing “Chevy” Fang & Kulraj Singh & Taewoo Kim & Laura Marler & James J. Chrisman, 2022. "Family business research in Asia: review and future directions," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 39(4), pages 1215-1256, December.
    7. Pramodita Sharma & James J. Chrisman & Jess H. Chua & Lloyd P. Steier, 2020. "Family Firm Behavior From a Psychological Perspective," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 44(1), pages 3-19, January.
    8. Andrea Dello Sbarba & Alessandro Marelli, 2018. "Family-controlled businesses and management control: the framing of “shareholder-oriented” practices," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 417-456, February.
    9. Christensen-Salem, Amanda & Mesquita, Luiz F. & Hashimoto, Marcos & Hom, Peter W. & Gomez-Mejia, Luis R., 2021. "Family firms are indeed better places to work than non-family firms! Socioemotional wealth and employees’ perceived organizational caring," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 12(1).
    10. Arijs, Diane & Botero, Isabel C. & Michiels, Anneleen & Molly, Vincent, 2018. "Family business employer brand: Understanding applicants’ perceptions and their job pursuit intentions with samples from the US and Belgium," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 180-191.
    11. Gilberto E. Arce & Edgar Robles C., 2005. "Corporate Governance in Costa Rica," Research Department Publications 3218, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
    12. Klapper, Leora F. & Love, Inessa, 2004. "Corporate governance, investor protection, and performance in emerging markets," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 10(5), pages 703-728, November.
    13. Díez-Esteban, José María & Farinha, Jorge Bento & García-Gómez, Conrado Diego, 2016. "The role of institutional investors in propagating the 2007 financial crisis in Southern Europe," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 439-454.
    14. Fidrmuc, Jana P. & Jacob, Marcus, 2010. "Culture, agency costs, and dividends," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 321-339, September.
    15. Kamini Gupta & Donal Crilly & Thomas Greckhamer, 2020. "Stakeholder engagement strategies, national institutions, and firm performance: A configurational perspective," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(10), pages 1869-1900, October.
    16. Nicodano, Giovanna & Regis, Luca, 2019. "A trade-off theory of ownership and capital structure," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(3), pages 715-735.
    17. Francesco Caselli & Nicola Gennaioli, 2008. "Economics and Politics of Alternative Institutional Reforms," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 123(3), pages 1197-1250.
    18. Jongmoo Jay Choi & Hoje Jo & Jimi Kim & Moo Sung Kim, 2018. "Business Groups and Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(4), pages 931-954, December.
    19. Heinrich, Ralph P., 1999. "Complementarities in Corporate Governance - A Survey of the Literature with Special Emphasis on Japan," Kiel Working Papers 947, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    20. Lepetit, Laetitia & Saghi-Zedek, Nadia & Tarazi, Amine, 2015. "Excess control rights, bank capital structure adjustments, and lending," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(3), pages 574-591.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipg:wpaper:2019-003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ingmar Schumacher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipagpfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.