IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iim/iimawp/14586.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Leadership and Management of Public Sector Undertakings in an Emerging Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Gupta, Vishal
  • Kulkarni, Swanand
  • Khatri, Naresh

Abstract

Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) contribute significantly to the growth and economic development of any country. This study explores the key managerial challenges faced by the leaders and managers of public sector organizations. We interviewed 42 senior managers of PSUs from various industries representing 12 Indian states representing all the regions of India. Specifically, three key managerial challenges emerged in our study: political interference and lack of autonomy, rigid rules and HR practices, and lack of employee motivation. Positive leader personality, communication skills, change- and relation-oriented behaviors, HR skills, and decision-making emerged as top leader qualities. Staffing, training and development and performance management emerged as the top priorities of HR departments of PSUs. Public-service motivation, job security and work environment were the top reasons for continuing to work in PSUs for Indian leaders. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Gupta, Vishal & Kulkarni, Swanand & Khatri, Naresh, 2018. "Leadership and Management of Public Sector Undertakings in an Emerging Economy," IIMA Working Papers WP 2018-01-04, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    • Handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:14586
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.iima.ac.in/sites/default/files/rnpfiles/17499772842018-01-04.pdf
    File Function: English Version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leslie, Keith & Canwell, Adam, 2010. "Leadership at all levels: Leading public sector organisations in an age of austerity," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 297-305, August.
    2. George A. Boyne, 1998. "Public Services Under New Labour: Back to Bureaucracy?," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 43-50, July.
    3. Rachita Satyawadi & Piyali Ghosh, 2012. "Motivation and work values in Indian public and private sector enterprises: a comparative study," International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(3), pages 237-253.
    4. George A. Boyne, 2002. "Public and Private Management: What’s the Difference?," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(1), pages 97-122, January.
    5. Sanjay Sehgal & Muneesh Kumar & Priyanshi Gupta, 2014. "Public Sector Disinvestment in India," Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, Emerging Markets Forum, vol. 6(2), pages 181-202, May.
    6. P.K. Jain & Seema Gupta & Surendra S. Yadav, 2014. "Public Sector Enterprises in India," Springer Books, Springer, edition 127, number 978-81-322-1762-6, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Suneel Maheshwari & Vasudha Gupta & Deepak Raghava Naik, 2022. "Development of Risk Index and Risk Governance Index: Application in Indian Public Sector Undertakings," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Jan-Hinrik Meyer-Sahling & Barbara Janta & Iveta Reinholde & Christian van Stolk, 2016. "Hidden costs of cuts: Austerity, civil service management and the motivation of public officials in Central and Eastern Europe after the crisis," European Journal of Government and Economics, Europa Grande, vol. 5(2), pages 120-137, December.
    3. Carole RENTSCH & Matthias FINGER, 2014. "Yes, no, maybe: the ambiguous relationships between State-owned enterprises and States," Departmental Working Papers 2014-05, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    4. Arundel, Anthony & Casali, Luca & Hollanders, Hugo, 2015. "How European public sector agencies innovate: The use of bottom-up, policy-dependent and knowledge-scanning innovation methods," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(7), pages 1271-1282.
    5. Leask, Anna, 2010. "Progress in visitor attraction research: Towards more effective management," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 155-166.
    6. Bilal Anwar & Zhongdong Xiao & Sharmin Akter & Ramiz-Ur Rehman, 2017. "Sustainable Urbanization and Development Goals Strategy through Public–Private Partnerships in a South-Asian Metropolis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-26, October.
    7. Thi Cam Tu Luong & Ann Jorissen & Ine Paeleman, 2019. "Performance Measurement for Sustainability: Does Firm Ownership Matter," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-35, August.
    8. van der Voet, Joris, 2014. "The effectiveness and specificity of change management in a public organization: Transformational leadership and a bureaucratic organizational structure," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 373-382.
    9. Martin Warland, 2016. "What kinds of regional innovation systems occur around federal agencies?," Diskussionsschriften credresearchpaper10, Universitaet Bern, Departement Volkswirtschaft - CRED.
    10. Raake, Anke & Gleich, Ronald & Wald, Andreas, 2008. "Anwendungsstand und Erfolgsfaktoren von Kennzahlen- und Performance Measurement-Systemen in öffentlichen Unternehmen – Ergebnisse einer Studie im Öffentlichen Personennahverkehr," ZögU - Zeitschrift für öffentliche und gemeinwirtschaftliche Unternehmen, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 31(4), pages 408-426.
    11. Benedict C. Doepfer & André Habisch & Harald Pechlaner & Xenia-Isabel Poppe & Christoph Schwarz, 2016. "Entrepreneurship, shared values and the region - assessing the conditions for regional social performance of entrepreneurial behaviour," International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(1), pages 36-56.
    12. Giuliana Bronzoni Liberato & Marcelo Sanches Pagliarussi, 2008. "Disclosure de estratégia em relatórios anuais: a influência das dimensões culturais, do sistema legal e da governança corporativa em empresas de quatro países," Fucape Working Papers 03, Fucape Business School.
    13. Vahid Javidroozi & Hanifa Shah & Gerald Feldman, 2022. "Facilitating Smart City Development through Adaption of the Learnings from Enterprise Systems Integration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, March.
    14. Monika Kansal & Nava Subramaniam & Shekar Babu & Suresh Mony, 2020. "CSR in Government-Owned Enterprises in India: A Principal–Agent Perspective," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Bodo B. Schlegelmilch & Ilona Szőcs (ed.), Rethinking Business Responsibility in a Global Context, pages 219-236, Springer.
    15. Marukan Hendrik & Bambang Supriyono & M.R. Khayrul Muluk & Mardiyono Mardiyono, 2018. "Assessing the Influence of Leadership on the Implementation of Good Governance in a New Autonomous Region," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 6, pages 5-23.
    16. Porcher, Simon, 2017. "The ‘hidden costs’ of water provision: New evidence from the relationship between contracting-out and price in French water public services," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 166-175.
    17. Simović Dragana, 2015. "Project Management in Development Aid Industry – Public vs. Private," Croatian International Relations Review, Sciendo, vol. 21(72), pages 167-197, February.
    18. Jan-Erik Johanson & Elias Pekkola & Päivi Husman, 2017. "Government Programme as a Strategy—The Finnish Experience," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-15, May.
    19. Yongbeom Hur, 2018. "Testing Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory of Motivation in the Public Sector: Is it Applicable to Public Managers?," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 329-343, September.
    20. Marian W. Moszoro & Pablo T. Spiller, 2012. "Third-Party Opportunism and the Nature of Public Contracts," NBER Working Papers 18636, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:14586. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eciimin.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.