IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-02020886.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Civil Society Meta-organizations and Legitimating Processes: the Case of the Addiction Field in France

Author

Listed:
  • Adrien Laurent

    (IAE Paris - Sorbonne Business School)

  • Pierre Garaudel

    (IAE Paris - Sorbonne Business School)

  • Géraldine Schmidt

    (IAE Paris - Sorbonne Business School)

  • Philippe Eynaud

    (IAE Paris - Sorbonne Business School)

Abstract

To cope with the new challenges inherent to their political role, Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) must convince their stakeholders about their legitimacy, and meta-organizations (MOs) appear to play a central role in such a context (Arhne & Brunsson, 2005; Bonfils, 2011). In this paper, we aim to better understand the legitimating processes of a specific kind of MOs-namely Civil Society M Os (CSMOs)-, considering that CSMOs feature some characteristics that reinforce both internal and external legitimacy issues. Our research is based on an in-depth case study of a French national federation (Fédération Addiction) formed by the merger of two former federations originating in different fields, alcoholism treatment and drug addiction professionals. We confirm the importance of stakeholders' representativeness in the governance of MOs and especially in multi-stakeholders CSMOs, and we corroborate the assertion that MOs closely relate to categorization-related issues and the categorization process itself in many ways: the legitimacy and the potential f or action of M Os depend on the socially perceived appropriateness of the delimitation of the f ield that they claim to represent, and at the same time categorization is reinforced by the creation of MOs. We contribute to the current literature on MOs in two main ways. First, we show how a change in the relevant categorization may result from the dual and interacting actions of the M Os themselves and public authorities. Second, our case study illustrates how a restructuring of the MOs landscape may strengthen the salience of internal legitimacy issues federative actors are confronted with in order to maintain their representativeness and position in the expanded organizational field. In this dynamic context, external and internal legitimating processes appear closely intricate, and categorization and governance issues appear strongly interrelated.

Suggested Citation

  • Adrien Laurent & Pierre Garaudel & Géraldine Schmidt & Philippe Eynaud, 2019. "Civil Society Meta-organizations and Legitimating Processes: the Case of the Addiction Field in France," Post-Print halshs-02020886, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-02020886
    DOI: 10.1007/s11266-019-00094-8
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02020886
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02020886/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11266-019-00094-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Deborah Dougherty & Danielle D. Dunne, 2011. "Organizing Ecologies of Complex Innovation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1214-1223, October.
    2. Ahrne, Göran & Brunsson, Nils & Seidl, David, 2017. "On the fruitfulness of the concept of partial organization: A rejoinder to Apelt et al," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 297-299.
    3. Ahrne, Göran & Brunsson, Nils, 2005. "Organizations and meta-organizations," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 429-449, December.
    4. Suzana Rodrigues & John Child, 2003. "Co‐evolution in an Institutionalized Environment," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(8), pages 2137-2162, December.
    5. Fligstein, Neil, 2001. "Social Skill and the Theory of Fields," Center for Culture, Organizations and Politics, Working Paper Series qt26m187b1, Center for Culture, Organizations and Politics of theInstitute for Research on Labor and Employment, UC Berkeley.
    6. Apelt, Maja & Besio, Cristina & Corsi, Giancarlo & von Groddeck, Victoria & Grothe-Hammer, Michael & Tacke, Veronika, 2017. "Resurrecting organization without renouncing society: A response to Ahrne, Brunsson and Seidl," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 8-14.
    7. Radnejad, Amir Bahman & Vredenburg, Harrie & Woiceshyn, Jaana, 2017. "Meta-organizing for open innovation under environmental and social pressures in the oil industry," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 66, pages 14-27.
    8. Jean-Louis Louis Laville & Dennis Young & Philippe Eynaud, 2015. "Civil Society, the Third Sector and Social Enterprise : Governance and Democracy," Post-Print halshs-02064779, HAL.
    9. Héloïse Berkowitz & Sanne Bor, 2017. "Why Meta-Organizations Matter: A Response to Lawton et al. and Spillman," Post-Print hal-01897747, HAL.
    10. Sylvie Ehlinger & Véronique Perret & Didier Chabaud, 2015. "Quelle gouvernance pour les réseaux territorialisés d’organisations ?," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 0(8), pages 369-386.
    11. Héloïse Berkowitz & Hervé Dumez, 2016. "The Concept of Meta-Organization: Issues for Management Studies," Post-Print hal-01380375, HAL.
    12. Steve Cropper & Sanne Bor, 2018. "(Un)bounding the Meta-Organization: Co-Evolution and Compositional Dynamics of a Health Partnership," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-19, August.
    13. König, Andreas & Schulte, Martin & Enders, Albrecht, 2012. "Inertia in response to non-paradigmatic change: The case of meta-organizations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(8), pages 1325-1343.
    14. Héloïse Berkowitz & Hervé Dumez, 2015. "La dynamique des dispositifs d’action collective entre firmes : Le cas des méta-organisations dans le secteur pétrolier," Post-Print hal-01225281, HAL.
    15. Ahrne, Göran & Brunsson, Nils & Seidl, David, 2016. "Resurrecting organization by going beyond organizations," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 93-101.
    16. Héloïse Berkowitz & Sanne Bor, 2017. "Why Meta-Organizations Matter: A Response to Lawton et al. and Spillman," Post-Print hal-02008050, HAL.
    17. Ranjay Gulati & Phanish Puranam & Michael Tushman, 2012. "Meta‐organization design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(6), pages 571-586, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jennifer Saniossian & Xavier Lecocq & Christel Beaucourt, 2022. "Meta-Organizations in the Making. A Multiple Case Study of Multi-Stakeholder Meta-Organizations for Social Innovation," Post-Print hal-04654626, HAL.
    2. Pierre Garaudel, 2020. "Exploring meta-organizations’ diversity and agency: A meta-organizational perspective on global union federations," Post-Print halshs-02474817, HAL.
    3. Héloïse Berkowitz & Larry B. Crowder & Cassandra M Brooks, 2020. "Organizational Perspectives On Oceans Governance: Meta-Organizations And Cross-Sectoral Collective Action," Post-Print hal-02872175, HAL.
    4. Garaudel, Pierre, 2020. "Exploring meta-organizations’ diversity and agency: A meta-organizational perspective on global union federations," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(1).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Garaudel, Pierre, 2020. "Exploring meta-organizations’ diversity and agency: A meta-organizational perspective on global union federations," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(1).
    2. Pierre Garaudel, 2020. "Exploring meta-organizations’ diversity and agency: A meta-organizational perspective on global union federations," Post-Print halshs-02474817, HAL.
    3. Mike Valente & Christine Oliver, 2018. "Meta-Organization Formation and Sustainability in Sub-Saharan Africa," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 678-701, August.
    4. Michael Grothe-Hammer & Héloïse Berkowitz & Olivier Berthod, 2022. "Decisional organization theory: towards an integrated framework of organization," Post-Print hal-03699112, HAL.
    5. repec:hal:journl:hal-04654634 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Taewoo Roh & Shufeng Simon Xiao & Byung Il Park, 2023. "Effects of open innovation on eco-innovation in meta-organizations: evidence from Korean SMEs," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(5), pages 2004-2028, November.
    7. Evgeniya Lupova-Henry & Sam Blili & Cinzia Dal Zotto, 2021. "Designing organised clusters as social actors: a meta-organisational approach," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 10(1), pages 35-54, March.
    8. Berkowitz, Heloise, 2019. "An ontology of meta-organization: Variations in attributes, functions and profiles," OSF Preprints kc4a3, Center for Open Science.
    9. Steve Cropper & Sanne Bor, 2018. "(Un)bounding the Meta-Organization: Co-Evolution and Compositional Dynamics of a Health Partnership," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-19, August.
    10. Héloïse Berkowitz & Nils Brunsson & Michael Grothe-Hammer & Mikaela Sundberg & Bertrand Valiorgue, 2022. "Meta-Organizations: A Clarification and a Way Forward," Post-Print hal-03685386, HAL.
    11. Shiu, Jing-Ming & Dallas, Mark P. & Huang, Hui-Hsuan, 2023. "A friend of a friend? Informal authority, social capital, and networks in telecommunications standard-setting organizations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    12. Grothe-Hammer, Michael, 2019. "Organization without actorhood: Exploring a neglected phenomenon," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 325-338.
    13. Battisti, Sandro & Agarwal, Nivedita & Brem, Alexander, 2022. "Creating new tech entrepreneurs with digital platforms: Meta-organizations for shared value in data-driven retail ecosystems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    14. Héloïse Berkowitz & Michael Grothe-Hammer, 2022. "From A Clash Of Social Orders To A Loss Of Decidability In Meta-Organizations Tackling Grand Challenges: The Case Of Japan Leaving The International Whaling Commission," Post-Print halshs-03271137, HAL.
    15. Héloïse Berkowitz & Sanne Bor, 2022. "Meta-organization as partial organization: An integrated framework of organizationality and decisionality," Post-Print hal-03717158, HAL.
    16. Berkowitz, Heloise & Souchaud, Antoine, 2024. "Filling successive technologically-induced governance gaps: Meta-organizations as regulatory innovation intermediaries," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    17. Antoine Kauffmann, 2016. "La formation du destin commun au sein des méta-organisations : le cas des corridors logistico-portuaires," Post-Print hal-02429441, HAL.
    18. Gawer, Annabelle, 2014. "Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(7), pages 1239-1249.
    19. Roth, Steffen & Schwede, Peter & Valentinov, Vladislav & Pérez-Valls, Miguel & Kaivo-oja, Jari, 2020. "Harnessing big data for a multifunctional theory of the firm," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 54-61.
    20. Héloïse Berkowitz & Sanne Bor, 2024. "Meta-organizations for sustainability transformations: Navigating tensions between imperatives of transition and meta-organizationality," Post-Print hal-04493940, HAL.
    21. Järvi, Kati & Almpanopoulou, Argyro & Ritala, Paavo, 2018. "Organization of knowledge ecosystems: Prefigurative and partial forms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(8), pages 1523-1537.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Key-words: Legitimacy; legitimating process; meta-organizations; civil society organizations; merger; addictions; addictology;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-02020886. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.