IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04654634.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Co-évolution durant la création des méta-organisations multi-parties prenantes : influence sur les enjeux sociaux de territoire

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer Saniossian

    (UJM - Université Jean Monnet - Saint-Étienne, COACTIS - COnception de l'ACTIon en Situation - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - UJM - Université Jean Monnet - Saint-Étienne, IAE ST-E - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises de Saint Etienne - UJM - Université Jean Monnet - Saint-Étienne)

Abstract

Cinq ans après la volonté inscrite dans la loi de développer des Pôles Territoriaux de Coopération Economique (PTCE), nous cherchons à valider l'ambition politique des PTCE de favoriser et contribuer au développement local durable. Par l'observation des processus de création des méta-organisations multi-parties prenantes (MO MPP) (Ahrne & Brunsson, 2008 ; Berkowitz & Dumez, 2015), nous cherchons à mettre en évidence les effets de création des PTCE sur l'accélération du développement local durable dans les territoires concernés. De ce fait, la question de recherche de cette contribution est la suivante : En quoi le processus de création des méta-organisations multi-parties prenantes affecte la réponse aux enjeux sociaux de territoire ? L'article présente une étude de cas encastrée (Yin, 2009) sur le territoire régional des Hauts-de-France. La collecte des données est basée sur une étude multi-niveaux comprenant l'environnement institutionnel et de réseaux, les méta-organisations, et les organisations multi-parties prenantes. Par l'analyse des effets de co-évolution (Child et al., 2012 ; Jones, 2001 ; Lewin & Volberda, 1999) dans le processus de création des MO MPP au sein du territoire, nous mettons en évidence l'influence croisée des organisations, méta-organisations et environnement. Cette inter-influence en triptyque est même facilitée par le processus de création de la MO MPP. L'article contribue ainsi à révéler que les processus de co-évolution multiples influent sur la prise de conscience, la diffusion et le développement de réponses aux besoins sociaux de territoire. Cet article met également en évidence que le triptyque de co-évolution facilite la création de la MO MPP par le développement progressif de similarités entre les organisations parties prenantes ainsi que la mise en place d'un environnement facilitant.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer Saniossian, 2020. "Co-évolution durant la création des méta-organisations multi-parties prenantes : influence sur les enjeux sociaux de territoire," Post-Print hal-04654634, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04654634
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04654634
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04654634/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arie Y. Lewin & Henk W. Volberda, 1999. "Prolegomena on Coevolution: A Framework for Research on Strategy and New Organizational Forms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(5), pages 519-534, October.
    2. Ahrne, Göran & Brunsson, Nils, 2005. "Organizations and meta-organizations," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 429-449, December.
    3. Christian Voegtlin & Andreas Georg Scherer, 2017. "Responsible Innovation and the Innovation of Responsibility: Governing Sustainable Development in a Globalized World," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(2), pages 227-243, June.
    4. Suzana Rodrigues & John Child, 2003. "Co‐evolution in an Institutionalized Environment," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(8), pages 2137-2162, December.
    5. Mitchell P. Koza & Arie Y. Lewin, 1998. "The Co-Evolution of Strategic Alliances," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 255-264, June.
    6. Héloïse Berkowitz & Hervé Dumez, 2016. "The Concept of Meta-Organization: Issues for Management Studies," Post-Print hal-01380375, HAL.
    7. Steve Cropper & Sanne Bor, 2018. "(Un)bounding the Meta-Organization: Co-Evolution and Compositional Dynamics of a Health Partnership," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-19, August.
    8. John Child & Suzana B. Rodrigues & Kenneth K-T. Tse, 2012. "The Dynamics of Influence in Corporate Co-Evolution," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(7), pages 1246-1273, November.
    9. Dermot Breslin, 2016. "What evolves in organizational co-evolution?," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 20(1), pages 45-67, March.
    10. Céline Bourbousson & Nadine Richez-Battesti, 2017. "Caractériser les PTCE par l’analyse processuelle : Une application en région Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur," Post-Print hal-01455299, HAL.
    11. Christian Voegtlin & Scherer Andreas Georg, 2017. "Responsible Innovation and the Innovation of Responsibility: Governing Sustainable Development in a Globalized World," Post-Print hal-01540972, HAL.
    12. Arie Y. Lewin & Chris P. Long & Timothy N. Carroll, 1999. "The Coevolution of New Organizational Forms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(5), pages 535-550, October.
    13. Christopher Lecat & Philippe Lerouvillois & Martino Nieddu, 2017. "Quelle place pour les PTCE dans une perspective d’économie verte ?," Post-Print halshs-01705247, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiang, Shisong & Gong, Limin & Wang, Hua & Kimble, Chris, 2016. "Institution, strategy, and performance: A co-evolution model in transitional China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3352-3360.
    2. Marleen Dieleman & Wladimir M. Sachs, 2008. "Coevolution of Institutions and Corporations in Emerging Economies: How the Salim Group Morphed into an Institution of Suharto's Crony Regime," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(7), pages 1274-1300, November.
    3. Abatecola, Gianpaolo & Breslin, Dermot & Kask, Johan, 2020. "Do organizations really co-evolve? Problematizing co-evolutionary change in management and organization studies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    4. Adrien Laurent & Pierre Garaudel & Géraldine Schmidt & Philippe Eynaud, 2019. "Civil Society Meta-organizations and Legitimating Processes: the Case of the Addiction Field in France," Post-Print halshs-02020886, HAL.
    5. Arie Y. Lewin & Silvia Massini & Carine Peeters, 2011. "Microfoundations of Internal and External Absorptive Capacity Routines," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 81-98, February.
    6. Chan, Chui Shiam & Pattnaik, Chinmay, 2021. "Coevolution of home country support and internationalization of emerging market firms," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(4).
    7. Partanen, Jukka & Kohtamäki, Marko & Patel, Pankaj C. & Parida, Vinit, 2020. "Supply chain ambidexterity and manufacturing SME performance: The moderating roles of network capability and strategic information flow," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    8. Marguerite Schneider, 2002. "A Stakeholder Model of Organizational Leadership," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(2), pages 209-220, April.
    9. Pierre Garaudel, 2020. "Exploring meta-organizations’ diversity and agency: A meta-organizational perspective on global union federations," Post-Print halshs-02474817, HAL.
    10. Steve Cropper & Sanne Bor, 2018. "(Un)bounding the Meta-Organization: Co-Evolution and Compositional Dynamics of a Health Partnership," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-19, August.
    11. Frans A. J. Van den Bosch & Henk W. Volberda & Michiel de Boer, 1999. "Coevolution of Firm Absorptive Capacity and Knowledge Environment: Organizational Forms and Combinative Capabilities," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(5), pages 551-568, October.
    12. Wei Jiang & Kui Wang & Kevin Zheng Zhou, 2023. "How Political Ties and Green Innovation Co-evolve in China: Alignment with Institutional Development and Environmental Pollution," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 186(4), pages 739-760, September.
    13. Desirée F. Pacheco & Jeffrey G. York & Timothy J. Hargrave, 2014. "The Coevolution of Industries, Social Movements, and Institutions: Wind Power in the United States," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 1609-1632, December.
    14. van der Lugt, Larissa M. & Rodrigues, Suzana B. & van den Berg, Roy, 2014. "Co-evolution of the strategic reorientation of port actors: insights from the Port of Rotterdam and the Port of Barcelona," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 197-209.
    15. Yadong Luo & Huan Zhang & Juan Bu, 2019. "Developed country MNEs investing in developing economies: Progress and prospect," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(4), pages 633-667, June.
    16. Emmanuelle Reuter, 2022. "Hybrid business models in the sharing economy: The role of business model design for managing the environmental paradox," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 603-618, February.
    17. Reid, Gavin C. & Smith, Julia A., 2009. "A coevolutionary analysis of organisational systems and processes: Quantitative applications to information system dynamics in small entrepreneurial firms," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 20(6), pages 762-781.
    18. Kim, Younghwan & Kim, Wonjoon & Yang, Taeyong, 2012. "The effect of the triple helix system and habitat on regional entrepreneurship: Empirical evidence from the U.S," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 154-166.
    19. Tachia Chin & Francesco Caputo & Yi Shi & Mario Calabrese & Chiraz Aouina‐Mejri & Armando Papa, 2022. "Depicting the role of cross‐cultural legitimacy for responsible innovation in Asian‐Pacific business models: A dialectical systems view of Yin‐Yang harmony," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(6), pages 2083-2093, November.
    20. Simone Pizzi & Fabio Caputo & Andrea Venturelli, 2020. "Does it pay to be an honest entrepreneur? Addressing the relationship between sustainable development and bankruptcy risk," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 1478-1486, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04654634. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.