IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04948128.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Priced out of belonging? Insufficient concessions on membership fees across international societies in ecology and evolution

Author

Listed:
  • Malgorzata Lagisz
  • Kevin R Bairos-Novak
  • April Robin Martinig
  • Michael G Bertram
  • Ayumi Mizuno
  • Saeed Shafiei Sabet
  • Matthieu Paquet

    (SETE - Station d'Ecologie Théorique et Expérimentale - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - FR AIB - Fédération de Recherche Agrobiosciences, Interactions et Biodiversité - UT3 - Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier - UT - Université de Toulouse - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Manuela S Santana
  • Eli S J Thoré
  • Nina Trubanová
  • Joanna Rutkowska
  • James A Orr
  • Elina Takola
  • Yefeng Yang
  • Patrice Pottier
  • Dylan G E Gomes
  • Ying-Chi Chan
  • Zhenzhuo Xian
  • Caleb Onoja Akogwu
  • Szymon M Drobniak
  • Shinichi Nakagawa

Abstract

Learned societies, as professional bodies for scientists, are an integral part of the scientific system. However, their membership fees have the potential to be prohibitive to the most vulnerable members of the scientific community. To shed light on how membership fees are structured, we conducted a survey of 182 international learned societies relevant to researchers in ecology and evolution. We found that 83% of these societies offered fee concessions to students, but only 26% to postdoctoral researchers. An average regular membership fee—US$67.8, student fee—US$27.4 (42.7% of the regular fee) and postdoctoral fee—US$42.7 (52.9%). Other types of individual concessions, such as for emeritus, family or unemployed, were rare (2–20%). Of the surveyed societies, 43% had discounts for members from developing countries (Global South). Such discounts were more common among societies located in high-income countries. Societies with a publicly visible commitment to equity, diversity and inclusion were more likely to offer different types of concessions. Currently, fees may prevent researchers from vulnerable and underprivileged groups from accessing multiple professional benefits offered by learned societies in ecology and evolution. This includes postdoctoral researchers, who should receive more support. We recommend tangible actions towards making learned societies more affordable and accessible.

Suggested Citation

  • Malgorzata Lagisz & Kevin R Bairos-Novak & April Robin Martinig & Michael G Bertram & Ayumi Mizuno & Saeed Shafiei Sabet & Matthieu Paquet & Manuela S Santana & Eli S J Thoré & Nina Trubanová & Joanna, 2025. "Priced out of belonging? Insufficient concessions on membership fees across international societies in ecology and evolution," Post-Print hal-04948128, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04948128
    DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.1430
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04948128v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04948128v1/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1098/rspb.2024.1430?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kendall Powell, 2015. "The future of the postdoc," Nature, Nature, vol. 520(7546), pages 144-147, April.
    2. Heidi Ledford, 2008. "Collaborations: With all good intentions," Nature, Nature, vol. 452(7188), pages 682-684, April.
    3. Margaret C. Hardy & Adrian Carter & Nikola Bowden, 2016. "What do postdocs need to succeed? A survey of current standing and future directions for Australian researchers," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 2(1), pages 1-9, December.
    4. Vincent Larivière & Benoit Macaluso & Éric Archambault & Yves Gingras, 2010. "Which scientific elites? On the concentration of research funds, publications and citations," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(1), pages 45-53, March.
    5. Skupien, Stefan & Rüffin, Nicolas, 2020. "The Geography of Research Funding: Semantics and Beyond," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 24(1), pages 24-38.
    6. Paula Stephan & Jennifer Ma, 2005. "The Increased Frequency and Duration of the Postdoctorate Career Stage," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 95(2), pages 71-75, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ganguli, Ina & Gaulé, Patrick & Čugalj, Danijela Vuletić, 2022. "Chasing the academic dream: Biased beliefs and scientific labor markets," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 17-33.
    2. Ganguli, Ina & Gaule, Patrick & Čugalj, Danijela Vuletić, 2020. "Biased Beliefs and Entry into Scientific Careers," IZA Discussion Papers 13475, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Cathelijn J F Waaijer & Benoît Macaluso & Cassidy R Sugimoto & Vincent Larivière, 2016. "Stability and Longevity in the Publication Careers of U.S. Doctorate Recipients," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-15, April.
    4. Wu, Jiang & Ou, Guiyan & Liu, Xiaohui & Dong, Ke, 2022. "How does academic education background affect top researchers’ performance? Evidence from the field of artificial intelligence," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(2).
    5. Giulio Marini, 2021. "The employment destination of PhD-holders in Italy: non-academic funded projects as drivers of successful segmentation," DoQSS Working Papers 21-16, Quantitative Social Science - UCL Social Research Institute, University College London.
    6. Vanessa Sandoval-Romero & Vincent Larivière, 2020. "The national system of researchers in Mexico: implications of publication incentives for researchers in social sciences," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(1), pages 99-126, January.
    7. Paula E. Stephan, 2010. "The "I's" Have It: Immigration and Innovation, the Perspective from Academe," NBER Chapters, in: Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 10, pages 83-127, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Mehdi Rhaiem & Nabil Amara, 2020. "Determinants of research efficiency in Canadian business schools: evidence from scholar-level data," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(1), pages 53-99, October.
    9. Kimberlee A. Shauman, 2017. "Gender Differences in the Early Employment Outcomes of STEM Doctorates," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-26, March.
    10. Huang, Ding-wei, 2018. "Optimal distribution of science funding," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 502(C), pages 613-618.
    11. Songyue Lin & Kaixuan Zhang & Jin Liu & Wenjing Lyu, 2024. "Credential inflation and employment of university faculty in China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    12. Karen L. Webber & Manuel González Canché, 2018. "Is There a Gendered Path to Tenure? A Multi-State Approach to Examine the Academic Trajectories of U.S. Doctoral Recipients in the Sciences," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 59(7), pages 897-932, November.
    13. Huang, Ding-wei, 2021. "A basic model for empirical funding distributions," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 566(C).
    14. Larivière, Vincent & Gingras, Yves, 2011. "Averages of ratios vs. ratios of averages: An empirical analysis of four levels of aggregation," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 392-399.
    15. Grant C. Black & Paula E. Stephan, 2010. "The Economics of University Science and the Role of Foreign Graduate Students and Postdoctoral Scholars," NBER Chapters, in: American Universities in a Global Market, pages 129-161, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Paula Stephan & Giuseppe Scellato & Chiara Franzoni, 2015. "International Competition for PhDs and Postdoctoral Scholars: What Does (and Does Not) Matter," Innovation Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 15(1), pages 73-113.
    17. Jeffrey A. Groen, 2016. "The Impact of Labor Demand on Time to the Doctorate," Education Finance and Policy, MIT Press, vol. 11(1), pages 43-69, Winter.
    18. Farideh Osare & Mariam Keshvari, 2024. "Evaluation of a Scientific Productivity Model among World Highly Cited Authors: a Study Based on Experts’ Opinions," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 14452-14485, September.
    19. Ina Ganguli & Patrick Gaulé, 2019. "Will the US Keep the Best and the Brightest (as Postdocs)? Career and Location Preferences of Foreign STEM PhDs," NBER Chapters, in: The Roles of Immigrants and Foreign Students in US Science, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship, pages 49-69, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Barham, Bradford L. & Foltz, Jeremy D. & Prager, Daniel L., 2014. "Making time for science," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 21-31.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04948128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.