IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04896367.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Teleworking is a debatable issue
[Le télétravail, ça se discute]

Author

Listed:
  • Damien de Carvalho

    (CEREGE [Poitiers] - Centre de recherche en gestion - UP - Université de Poitiers = University of Poitiers)

  • Stéphane Bellini

    (DOORS [Cerege] - Dynamiques Organisationnelles, Outils, Régulation, Société [Équipe du Cerege] - CEREGE [Poitiers] - Centre de recherche en gestion - UP - Université de Poitiers = University of Poitiers)

Abstract

At the time of the first confinement in March 2020, teleworking had developed rapidly and on a large scale. This new context changed the usual modes of coordination and called for the use of digital technologies to mediate working relationships. We are specifically interested in the emergence of new operating rules during this period. Our research therefore aims to answer the following question: what role do digital tools play in the social regulations at work at the time of the transition to teleworking? A qualitative methodology, based on 44 semi-structured interviews conducted in two organizations, was used to gather data from the first days of the confinement. These were a departmental council (Val de Seine) and a company producing neurosurgical equipment (Neurochir). Our methodology was adapted to the health circumstances, as we repeated a series of interviews on two occasions, resulting in a total of three phases of investigation, spread over a year. At the end of the research, we highlighted the pivotal role of teleworking tools and a regulatory process left to the initiative of the players, leaving little room for discussion beyond the local level. In the course of this research, we have highlighted changes in regulations and their effects. These range from a feeling of trust in the organization, to a feeling of increased control, to a perception that work is being intensified and dehumanised. Digital tools contribute in each case, in the absence of organized discussion at an institutional level. Our research argues for a discussion of the rules governing telework, and more specifically those affecting telework tools. We offer some ideas for engineering discussion forums.

Suggested Citation

  • Damien de Carvalho & Stéphane Bellini, 2024. "Teleworking is a debatable issue [Le télétravail, ça se discute]," Post-Print hal-04896367, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04896367
    DOI: 10.3917/sim.291.0079
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04896367v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04896367v1/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3917/sim.291.0079?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:hal:journl:hal-04275139 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Mathieu Detchessahar, 2003. "L'avènement de l'entreprise communicationnelle," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 142(1), pages 65-84.
    3. Andrea Carugati & Lapo Mola & Loïc Plé & Marion Lauwers & Antonio Giangreco, 2020. "Exploitation and exploration of IT in times of pandemic: from dealing with emergency to institutionalising crisis practices," Post-Print halshs-03187028, HAL.
    4. Laurent Taskin, 2003. "Les Enjeux du télétravail pour l'organisation," Reflets et perspectives de la vie économique, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(1), pages 81-94.
    5. Valérie Fernandez & Caroline Guillot & Laurie Marrauld, 2014. "Télétravail et « travail à distance équipé ». Quelles compétences, tactiques et pratiques professionnelles ?," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 0(1), pages 101-118.
    6. Andrea Carugati & Lapo Mola & Loïc Plé & Marion Lauwers & Antonio Giangreco, 2020. "Exploitation and exploration of IT in times of pandemic: from dealing with emergency to institutionalising crisis practices," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(6), pages 762-777, November.
    7. Amaury Grimand & Johan Glaisner & Anouk Grevin, 2017. "Un travail a soi. Repères pour un management de l’appropriation du travail," Post-Print hal-03694821, HAL.
    8. Melissa Mazmanian & Wanda J. Orlikowski & JoAnne Yates, 2013. "The Autonomy Paradox: The Implications of Mobile Email Devices for Knowledge Professionals," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(5), pages 1337-1357, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Viktoria Maria Baumeister & Leonie Petra Kuen & Maike Bruckes & Gerhard Schewe, 2021. "The Relationship of Work-Related ICT Use With Well-being, Incorporating the Role of Resources and Demands: A Meta-Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    2. Angela Garcia Calvo & Martin Kenney & John Zysman, 2023. "Understanding work in the online platform economy: the narrow, the broad, and the systemic perspectives," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 32(4), pages 795-814.
    3. Yi Sun & Shihui Li & Lingling Yu, 2022. "The dark sides of AI personal assistant: effects of service failure on user continuance intention," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(1), pages 17-39, March.
    4. Nurmi, Niina & Koroma, Johanna, 2020. "The emotional benefits and performance costs of building a psychologically safe language climate in MNCs," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 55(4).
    5. Armanda Cetrulo & Dario Guarascio & Maria Enrica Virgillito, 2020. "Anatomy of the Italian occupational structure: concentrated power and distributed knowledge," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 29(6), pages 1345-1379.
    6. Nada Endrissat & Aurélie Leclercq Vandelannoitte, 2021. "From sites to vibes: Technology and the spatial production of coworking spaces," Post-Print hal-03332209, HAL.
    7. Ruthanne Huising, 2014. "The Erosion of Expert Control Through Censure Episodes," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 1633-1661, December.
    8. Christian P Theurer & Andranik Tumasjan & Isabell M Welpe, 2018. "Contextual work design and employee innovative work behavior: When does autonomy matter?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-35, October.
    9. Jens Thoemmes, 2024. "Negotiating Telework in France: Collective Bargaining Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic," Post-Print hal-04619772, HAL.
    10. Andrea Salvatori & Seetha Menon & Wouter Zwysen, 2018. "The effect of computer use on job quality: Evidence from Europe," OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 200, OECD Publishing.
    11. Nur Nahar Yasmin, 2024. "Four-day workweek in corporate sector: post-pandemic work arrangement for Bangladesh," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 4(7), pages 1-26, July.
    12. Ferdinando Paolo Santarpia & Laura Borgogni & Chiara Consiglio & Pietro Menatta, 2021. "The Bright and Dark Sides of Resources for Cross-Role Interrupting Behaviors and Work–Family Conflict: Preliminary Multigroup Findings on Remote and Traditional Working," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-20, November.
    13. Giurge, Laura M. & Bohns, Vanessa K., 2021. "You don’t need to answer right away! Receivers overestimate how quickly senders expect responses to non-urgent work emails," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 114-128.
    14. M. Lynne Markus & Frantz Rowe, 2018. "Is IT changing the world?," Post-Print hal-03716243, HAL.
    15. Zhuofei Lu & Senhu Wang & Wendy Olsen, 2023. "Revisiting the ‘flexibility paradox’: degree of work schedule flexibility and time use patterns across gender and occupational groups," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    16. Reinhardt, Ronny & Gurtner, Sebastian, 2018. "The overlooked role of embeddedness in disruptive innovation theory," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 268-283.
    17. Yasuhiro Kotera & Katia Correa Vione, 2020. "Psychological Impacts of the New Ways of Working (NWW): A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-13, July.
    18. Matt Beane & Wanda J. Orlikowski, 2015. "What Difference Does a Robot Make? The Material Enactment of Distributed Coordination," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(6), pages 1553-1573, December.
    19. Bertschek, Irene & Niebel, Thomas, 2016. "Mobile and more productive? Firm-level evidence on the productivity effects of mobile internet use," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(9), pages 888-898.
    20. Mohamed Ali Ben Halima & Nathalie Greenan & Joseph Lanfranchi, 2021. "Organisational changes and long-term sickness absence and injury leave: a difference in difference approach," TEPP Working Paper 2021-05, TEPP.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04896367. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.