IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04321292.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Towards A Better Understanding Of Integration Processes: Validation Of A Model Of Newcomers’ Proactive Behaviors
[Vers Une Meilleure Comprehension Des Processus D'Integration : Validation D'Un Modele D'Integration Proactive Des Nouveaux Salaries]

Author

Listed:
  • Delphine Lacaze

    (AMU IAE - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Aix-en-Provence - AMU - Aix Marseille Université)

Abstract

Managing newcomers' integration in enterprises is of major importance nowadays as difficulties in recruitment of efficient workers and loss of competencies are feared. Based on the theoretical background of organizational socialization, this research aims at validating a model of the proactive role of new recruits in the process of integration for low qualified jobs in services. A quantitative validation with structural equations modeling showed that newcomers' individual integration tactics are used in a sequential manner allowing a higher level of socialization in four domains (mediating variables) which in turn, are related to a higher work performance. Organizational socialization tactics (moderating variables) do not foster the efficiency of individual integration tactics which justifies to center the management of integration on individuals by stimulating newcomers' proactivity and developing tools to accompany their efforts.

Suggested Citation

  • Delphine Lacaze, 2005. "Towards A Better Understanding Of Integration Processes: Validation Of A Model Of Newcomers’ Proactive Behaviors [Vers Une Meilleure Comprehension Des Processus D'Integration : Validation D'Un Mode," Post-Print hal-04321292, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04321292
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://amu.hal.science/hal-04321292
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://amu.hal.science/hal-04321292/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bandura, Albert & Cervone, Daniel, 1986. "Differential engagement of self-reactive influences in cognitive motivation," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 92-113, August.
    2. Vancouver, Jeffrey B. & Morrison, Elizabeth Wolfe, 1995. "Feedback Inquiry: The Effect of Source Attributes and Individual Differences," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 276-285, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Islam, Asad & Kwon, Sungoh & Masood, Eema & Prakash, Nishith & Sabarwal, Shwetlena & Saraswat, Deepak, 2020. "When Goal-Setting Forges Ahead but Stops Short," GLO Discussion Paper Series 526, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    2. Daniel R Clark & Dan Li & Dean A Shepherd, 2018. "Country familiarity in the initial stage of foreign market selection," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 49(4), pages 442-472, May.
    3. Ghulam Mustafa & Richard Glavee-Geo & Kjell Gronhaug & Hanan Saber Almazrouei, 2019. "Structural Impacts on Formation of Self-Efficacy and Its Performance Effects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-24, February.
    4. Shepherd, Dean A. & Zacharakis, Andrew, 2002. "Venture capitalists' expertise: A call for research into decision aids and cognitive feedback," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 1-20, January.
    5. Mohr, Lois A. & Bitner, Mary Jo, 1995. "The role of employee effort in satisfaction with service transactions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 239-252, March.
    6. Lord, Robert G. & Brown, Douglas J. & Freiberg, Steven J., 1999. "Understanding the Dynamics of Leadership: The Role of Follower Self-Concepts in the Leader/Follower Relationship," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 78(3), pages 167-203, June.
    7. Jyoti Choudrie & Efpraxia Zamani & Chike Obuekwe, 2022. "Bridging the Digital Divide in Ethnic Minority Older Adults: an Organisational Qualitative Study," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 1355-1375, August.
    8. Hannah, Sean T. & Avolio, Bruce J. & Walumbwa, Fred O. & Chan, Adrian, 2012. "Leader Self and Means Efficacy: A multi-component approach," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 118(2), pages 143-161.
    9. K. E. M. De Stobbeleir & S. J. Ashford & D. Buyens, 2008. "Feedback-Seeking Behavior as a Self-Regulation Strategy for Creative Performance," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 08/533, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    10. Dalton, P.S. & Gonzalez Jimenez, V.H. & Noussair, C.N., 2015. "Paying with Self-Chosen Goals : Incentives and Gender Differences," Other publications TiSEM 35daceab-34bc-4bd2-b330-e, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    11. AL Kayid, Wejdan & Jin, Zhongqi & Priporas, Constantinos-Vasilios & Ramakrishnan, Sumeetra, 2022. "Defining family business efficacy: An exploratory study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 713-725.
    12. Flávia de Souza Costa Neves Cavazotte & Cristiano José Pereira Duarte & Anna Maria Calvão Gobbo, 2013. "Authentic leader, safe work: the influence of leadership on safety performance," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 10(2), pages 95-119, June.
    13. Jie Gao & Wenjing Jia & Jun Yin, 2024. "Exploring Smartphone User Interface Experience-Sharing Behavior: Design Perception and Motivation-Driven Mechanisms through the SOR Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-22, August.
    14. Mulvey, Paul W. & Klein, Howard J., 1998. "The Impact of Perceived Loafing and Collective Efficacy on Group Goal Processes and Group Performance," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 74(1), pages 62-87, April.
    15. Tabernero, Carmen & Wood, Robert E., 1999. "Implicit Theories versus the Social Construal of Ability in Self-Regulation and Performance on a Complex Task," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 78(2), pages 104-127, May.
    16. Jonas Lechermeier & Martin Fassnacht, 2018. "How do performance feedback characteristics influence recipients’ reactions? A state-of-the-art review on feedback source, timing, and valence effects," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 68(2), pages 145-193, April.
    17. Martin, Sean R. & Harrison, Spencer H. & Hoopes, Charlotte & Schroeder, Juliana & Belmi, Peter R., 2022. "Talking shop: An exploration of how talking about work affects our initial interactions," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    18. Grover, Steven L. & Coppins, Amber, 2012. "The intersection of justice and leadership: Testing a moderation model of contingent reward and interpersonal fairness," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 490-498.
    19. Little, Cedric & Felzensztein, Christian & Gimmon, Eli & Muñoz, Pablo, 2015. "The business management of the Chilean salmon farming industry," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 108-117.
    20. Mohammad H. Pakravan & Nordica MacCarty, 2020. "What Motivates Behavior Change? Analyzing User Intentions to Adopt Clean Technologies in Low-Resource Settings Using the Theory of Planned Behavior," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-32, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04321292. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.