IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04085604.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Pedestrian mobility in Mobility as a Service (MaaS): sustainable value potential and policy implications in the Paris region case

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Mariana Reyes Madrigal

    (LGI - Laboratoire Génie Industriel - CentraleSupélec - Université Paris-Saclay, IRT SystemX)

  • Isabelle Nicolaï

    (LGI - Laboratoire Génie Industriel - CentraleSupélec - Université Paris-Saclay)

  • Jakob Puchinger

    (Métis Lab EM Normandie - EM Normandie - École de Management de Normandie, LGI - Laboratoire Génie Industriel - CentraleSupélec - Université Paris-Saclay)

Abstract

Pedestrian mobility remains neglected in MaaS solutions, yet it has the potential to become a tool for promoting public policies and more sustainable lifestyles away from excessive private car use. This research identifies the potential for sustainable value creation and the transversal implications for policymakers and other MaaS stakeholders of overlooking walking in innovations like MaaS. To do so, we explore how walking is currently integrated into four MaaS solutions in the Paris region. Our main findings show heterogeneity in the hierarchy given to walking in the user interfaces and the determinant roles of governance and policy in supporting the prioritization of pedestrian mobility in MaaS.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Mariana Reyes Madrigal & Isabelle Nicolaï & Jakob Puchinger, 2023. "Pedestrian mobility in Mobility as a Service (MaaS): sustainable value potential and policy implications in the Paris region case," Post-Print hal-04085604, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04085604
    DOI: 10.1186/s12544-023-00585-2
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04085604v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04085604v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s12544-023-00585-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lajas, Renata & Macário, Rosário, 2020. "Public policy framework supporting “mobility-as-a-service” implementation," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    2. J. Rafael Verduzco Torres & Jinhyun Hong & David Philip McArthur, 2022. "How do psychological, habitual and built environment factors influence cycling in a city with a well-connected cycling infrastructure?," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 478-498, July.
    3. Jana Sochor, 2021. "Piecing Together the Puzzle: Mobility as a Service from the User and Service Design Perspectives," International Transport Forum Discussion Papers 2021/08, OECD Publishing.
    4. Benjamin Maas, 2022. "Literature Review of Mobility as a Service," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-28, July.
    5. Göran Smith & Jana Sochor & I.C. MariAnne Karlsson, 2019. "Public–private innovation: barriers in the case of mobility as a service in West Sweden," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 116-137, January.
    6. Cottrill, Caitlin D., 2020. "MaaS surveillance: Privacy considerations in mobility as a service," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 50-57.
    7. Bhavana Vaddadi & Xiaoyun Zhao & Yusak Susilo & Anna Pernestål, 2020. "Measuring System-Level Impacts of Corporate Mobility as a Service (CMaaS) Based on Empirical Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-18, August.
    8. Stefania Boglietti & Benedetto Barabino & Giulio Maternini, 2021. "Survey on e-Powered Micro Personal Mobility Vehicles: Exploring Current Issues towards Future Developments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-34, March.
    9. Hirschhorn, Fabio & Paulsson, Alexander & Sørensen, Claus H. & Veeneman, Wijnand, 2019. "Public transport regimes and mobility as a service: Governance approaches in Amsterdam, Birmingham, and Helsinki," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 178-191.
    10. Markvica, Karin & Millonig, Alexandra & Haufe, Nadine & Leodolter, Maximilian, 2020. "Promoting active mobility behavior by addressing information target groups: The case of Austria," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    11. Cervero, Robert & Radisch, Carolyn, 1996. "Travel choices in pedestrian versus automobile oriented neighborhoods," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 127-141, July.
    12. Becker, Henrik & Balac, Milos & Ciari, Francesco & Axhausen, Kay W., 2020. "Assessing the welfare impacts of Shared Mobility and Mobility as a Service (MaaS)," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 228-243.
    13. Banister, David, 2008. "The sustainable mobility paradigm," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 73-80, March.
    14. Peraphan Jittrapirom & Valeria Caiati & Anna-Maria Feneri & Shima Ebrahimigharehbaghi & María J. Alonso González & Jishnu Narayan, 2017. "Mobility as a Service: A Critical Review of Definitions, Assessments of Schemes, and Key Challenges," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 2(2), pages 13-25.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kayikci, Yasanur & Kabadurmus, Ozgur, 2022. "Barriers to the adoption of the mobility-as-a-service concept: The case of Istanbul, a large emerging metropolis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 219-236.
    2. Iria Lopez-Carreiro & Andres Monzon & Elena Lopez, 2023. "MaaS Implications in the Smart City: A Multi-Stakeholder Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-27, July.
    3. Benjamin Maas, 2022. "Literature Review of Mobility as a Service," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-28, July.
    4. Nikitas, Alexandros & Cotet, Corneliu & Vitel, Alexandra-Elena & Nikitas, Nikolaos & Prato, Carlo, 2024. "Transport stakeholders’ perceptions of Mobility-as-a-Service: A Q-study of cultural shift proponents, policy advocates and technology supporters," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    5. Hasselwander, Marc & Bigotte, Joao F. & Antunes, Antonio P. & Sigua, Ricardo G., 2022. "Towards sustainable transport in developing countries: Preliminary findings on the demand for mobility-as-a-service (MaaS) in Metro Manila," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 501-518.
    6. Smith, Göran & Sørensen, Claus Hedegaard, 2023. "Public-private MaaS: Unchallenged assumptions and issues of conflict in Sweden," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    7. Tom Storme & Corneel Casier & Hossein Azadi & Frank Witlox, 2021. "Impact Assessments of New Mobility Services: A Critical Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, March.
    8. Ye, Jianhong & Zheng, Jiaqi, 2024. "How stakeholders influence MaaS implementation? An analysis based on evolutionary game theory," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 198-210.
    9. Reck, Daniel J. & Hensher, David A. & Ho, Chinh Q., 2020. "MaaS bundle design," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 485-501.
    10. Åsa Hult & Liisa Perjo & Göran Smith, 2021. "Shared Mobility in Rural Contexts: Organizational Insights from Five Mobility-as-a-Service Pilots in Sweden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-17, September.
    11. Samira Dibaj & Aryan Hosseinzadeh & Miloš N. Mladenović & Robert Kluger, 2021. "Where Have Shared E-Scooters Taken Us So Far? A Review of Mobility Patterns, Usage Frequency, and Personas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-27, October.
    12. Frank, Laura & Klopfer, Antonia & Walther, Grit, 2024. "Designing corporate mobility as a service – Decision support and perspectives," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    13. Liu, Jianing & Wen, Xiao & Jian, Sisi, 2024. "Toward better equity: Analyzing travel patterns through a neural network approach in mobility-as-a-service," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 110-126.
    14. Ruhrort, Lisa, 2020. "Reassessing the Role of Shared Mobility Services in a Transport Transition: Can They Contribute the Rise of an Alternative Socio-Technical Regime of Mobility?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 12(19), pages 1-1.
    15. Haarstad, Håvard & Sareen, Siddharth & Kandt, Jens & Coenen, Lars & Cook, Matthew, 2022. "Beyond automobility? Lock-in of past failures in low-carbon urban mobility innovations," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    16. Remme, Devyn & Sareen, Siddharth & Haarstad, Håvard, 2022. "Who benefits from sustainable mobility transitions? Social inclusion, populist resistance and elite capture in Bergen, Norway," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    17. Abouelela, Mohamed & Durán-Rodas, David & Antoniou, Constantinos, 2024. "Do we all need shared E-scooters? An accessibility-centered spatial equity evaluation approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    18. Beheshtian, Arash & Richard Geddes, R. & Rouhani, Omid M. & Kockelman, Kara M. & Ockenfels, Axel & Cramton, Peter & Do, Wooseok, 2020. "Bringing the efficiency of electricity market mechanisms to multimodal mobility across congested transportation systems," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 58-69.
    19. Mari Luz Brownrigg-Gleeson & Andres Monzon & Adriana Cortez, 2023. "Reasons to Pedestrianise Urban Centres: Impact Analysis on Mobility Habits, Liveability and Economic Activities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-25, November.
    20. Michaël Distelmans & Ilse Scheerlinck, 2021. "Institutional Strategies in the Ridesharing Economy: A Content Analysis Based on Uber’s Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-25, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Mobility as a service; MaaS; Walking; Pedestrian mobility; Sustainable mobility; Inclusion; Active mobility; Sustainable value; Public policies; Governance;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04085604. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.