IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03741841.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

What Is the Best Response Scale for Survey and Questionnaire Design; Review of Different Lengths of Rating Scale / Attitude Scale / Likert Scale

Author

Listed:
  • Hamed Taherdoost

    (Research Club (Research and Development Departement) | Hamta Group)

Abstract

One of the important research tool is questionnaire. Decision mak ers and researchers across all academic and industry sectors conduct surveys and questionnaires to uncover answers to specific, significant questions. In fact, questionnaires and surveys can be an effective tools for data collection required for research and evaluation. In order to develop a survey/questionnaire, first the researcher should decide how to collect the required data. In this regard, scaling is the branch of measurement that involves the construction of an instrument. One of the most widely used scaling method is attitude scales to measure instruments and Lik ert scale is applied as one of the most fundamental and frequently used psychometric tools in sociology, psychology, information system, politics, economy and many more research. However, research methodology research have not particularly suggested the best rating scale to be chosen for a research. This study is going to provide an overview of the Lik ert scale and comparing rating scales of different lengths. Results will mak e researchers able to mak e decision on what number of Lik ert scale points use for their survey and questionnaire. Tak en as a whole this study suggests using of seven-point rating scale and if there is a need to have respondent to be directed on one side, then six-point scale might be the most suitable.

Suggested Citation

  • Hamed Taherdoost, 2019. "What Is the Best Response Scale for Survey and Questionnaire Design; Review of Different Lengths of Rating Scale / Attitude Scale / Likert Scale," Post-Print hal-03741841, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03741841
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03741841
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03741841/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hamed Taherdoost, 2017. "Determining Sample Size; How to Calculate Survey Sample Size," Post-Print hal-02557333, HAL.
    2. Hamed Taherdoost, 2016. "How to Design and Create an Effective Survey/Questionnaire; A Step by Step Guide," Post-Print hal-02546800, HAL.
    3. Hamed Taherdoost, 2016. "Validity and Reliability of the Research Instrument; How to Test the Validation of a Questionnaire/Survey in a Research," Post-Print hal-02546799, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bo Li & Rita Yi Man Li & Thitinant Wareewanich, 2021. "Factors Influencing Large Real Estate Companies’ Competitiveness: A Sustainable Development Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, November.
    2. del Val Núñez, Maria Teresa & de Lucas Ancillo, Antonio & Gavrila Gavrila, Sorin & Gómez Gandía, José Andrés, 2024. "Technological transformation in HRM through knowledge and training: Innovative business decision making," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    3. Carmen Fernández Amat & Francisco Javier Zarza-Alzugaray & Luis Barrio Aranda, 2024. "Design and validation of a scale for the assessment of educational competencies in traditional musical games," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Debora Scarpato & Gennaro Civero & Mariarosaria Simeone, 2023. "Do Consumers Adhere to a Sustainable Mediterranean Food Pattern? An Analysis of Southern Italian Consumer Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-12, September.
    5. Yohannes Girma & Berhanu Kuma & Amsalu Bedemo, 2023. "Risk Aversion and Perception of Farmers about Endogenous Risks: An Empirical Study for Maize Producers in Awi Zone, Amhara Region of Ethiopia," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-29, February.
    6. Jacopo Gaspari & Ernesto Antonini & Lia Marchi & Vincenzo Vodola, 2021. "Energy Transition at Home: A Survey on the Data and Practices That Lead to a Change in Household Energy Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-24, May.
    7. Liao, Junyun & Pang, Jiecong & Dong, Xuebing, 2023. "More gain, more give? The impact of brand community value on users’ value co-creation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    8. Rinaldi, Marta & Bottani, Eleonora, 2023. "How did COVID-19 affect logistics and supply chain processes? Immediate, short and medium-term evidence from some industrial fields of Italy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    9. Fuyong Lu & Xintao Wang & Siheng Li & Qun Zhao, 2023. "How Mobile Health Livingstreaming Engages the Consumer-Insights from a Dual-Process Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-22, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hamed Taherdoost, 2019. "What Is the Best Response Scale for Survey and Questionnaire Design; Review of Different Lengths of Rating Scale / Attitude Scale / Likert Scale," Post-Print hal-02557308, HAL.
    2. Hamed Taherdoost, 2022. "What are Different Research Approaches? Comprehensive Review of Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Research, Their Applications, Types, and Limitations," Post-Print hal-03741840, HAL.
    3. Paul Okello Atieno, 2023. "Peace Initiatives in Resource Based Conflicts in Post-Colonial Kenya: A Case of Lower Nyando River Basin of Kisumu County, Kenya," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 10(1), pages 110-120, January.
    4. Geoffrey Rogito Nyamotal & Dionysious Kihika Kiambi & Kirema Nkanata Mburugu, 2024. "Influence of Democratic Leadership Style on the Performance of Agricultural Enterprises in Kenya," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(6), pages 2441-2453, June.
    5. Katarina Kostelić, 2021. "Game Awareness: A Questionnaire," Games, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-39, December.
    6. Livelyn D. Argallon & Jaycee Rylle O. Loreño & Honey Jane C. Paham & Jovenil R. Bacatan, 2022. "Perceived Effects of Modular Distance Learning on the Students in Aumbay Elementary School," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(9), pages 496-506, September.
    7. Violetta Luzie Neusuess, 2020. "An Investigation of the Factors Influencing UAE Nationals to undertake Technical and Vocational Education," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 9(1), pages 95-113, July.
    8. Hamed Taherdoost, 2021. "Data Collection Methods and Tools for Research; A Step-by-Step Guide to Choose Data Collection Technique for Academic and Business Research Projects," Post-Print hal-03741847, HAL.
    9. Reema Bera & Bhargab Maitra, 2021. "Analyzing Prospective Owners’ Choice Decision towards Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles in Urban India: A Stated Preference Discrete Choice Experiment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-24, July.
    10. Juliana Melo & Ana Isabel Ribeiro & Susana Aznar & Andreia Pizarro & Maria Paula Santos, 2021. "Urban Green Spaces, Greenness Exposure and Species Richness in Residential Environments and Relations with Physical Activity and BMI in Portuguese Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-14, June.
    11. Katarina Kostelić & Morena Paulišić & Marli Gonan Božac, 2023. "Modeling Conflicts at Work: The Case of Elementary School Employees in Croatia," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-31, January.
    12. Mojaki Lawrence Moetapele & Chukwuere Joshua Ebere, 2021. "An evaluation of selected supply chain management elements in department of community safety and transport management in Mahikeng," HOLISTICA – Journal of Business and Public Administration, Sciendo, vol. 12(3), pages 13-38, December.
    13. Mallikarjun Patil & Bandhan Bandhu Majumdar & Prasanta Kumar Sahu & Long T. Truong, 2021. "Evaluation of Prospective Users’ Choice Decision toward Electric Two-Wheelers Using a Stated Preference Survey: An Indian Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-22, March.
    14. Ghulam Mustafa Ahmdani & Muhammad Zafar, 2022. "Developing a Research Instrument to Measure Conflict Resolution Skill among Elementary School Students," Journal of Policy Research (JPR), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 8(3), pages 324-328, September.
    15. Maksymilian Czeczotko & Hanna Górska-Warsewicz & Wacław Laskowski & Barbara Rostecka, 2021. "Towards Sustainable Private Labels in an Autonomous Community during COVID-19—Analysis of Consumer Behavior and Perception on the Example of Tenerife," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-22, July.
    16. Aithal, Architha & Aithal, Sreeramana, 2020. "Development and Validation of Survey Questionnaire and Experimental Data – A Systematical Review-based Statistical Approach," MPRA Paper 104830, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Xueying Wu & Wenyi Zhao & Tianshan Ma & Ziyu Yang, 2019. "Improving the Efficiency of Highway Construction Project Management Using Lean Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-27, July.
    18. Marazi, Naveed Farooz & Majumdar, Bandhan Bandhu & Sahu, Prasanta K. & Potoglou, Dimitris, 2022. "Congestion pricing acceptability among commuters: An Indian perspective," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    19. Candice E Thomas & Gavin Abbott & Paul B Gastin & Luana C Main, 2020. "Construct validity and reliability of the Talent Development Environment Questionnaire in Caribbean youth track and field athletes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, January.
    20. Simon Gwara & Edilegnaw Wale & Alfred Odindo & Chris Buckley, 2020. "Why do We Know So Much and Yet So Little? A Scoping Review of Willingness to Pay for Human Excreta Derived Material in Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-25, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03741841. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.