IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v6y2022i9p496-506.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived Effects of Modular Distance Learning on the Students in Aumbay Elementary School

Author

Listed:
  • Livelyn D. Argallon

    (Teacher Education, UM Peñaplata College, Philippines)

  • Jaycee Rylle O. Loreño

    (Teacher Education, UM Peñaplata College, Philippines)

  • Honey Jane C. Paham

    (Teacher Education, UM Peñaplata College, Philippines)

  • Jovenil R. Bacatan

    (Teacher Education, UM Peñaplata College, Philippines)

Abstract

This research aimed to gather data on the perceived effects of modular distance learning on students. The following research objectives informed this research: 1) to determine the perceived effects of modular distance learning on the students and 2) to determine the significant difference in the perceived effects of modular distance learning on grades 4,5 and 6 students. This quantitative study employed a descriptive survey to determine and identify the perceived effects of modular distance learning on grades 4,5 and 6 students. The research instrument used in this study is a survey questionnaire, which is used to acquire the necessary data. Based on the result, the study revealed that students agreed on using modular distance learning as a teaching method. They agreed most with the statements and the benefits of this approach. The study also revealed no significant difference in the perceived effects of modular distance learning on students when categorized according to gender. This means that students had the same perceptions when categorized according to gender. However, the study also revealed a significant difference in the perceived effects of modular distance learning on the students when categorized according to their grade level. It means that students had a different perception when they were grouped according to their grade level. Therefore, researchers concluded that in terms of gender, modular distance learning was not affected by their perception of the modular approach. At the same time, the perception of the students had a difference in terms of their grade level. This study implies that this modular distance learning approach helps students improve their perception of modules. Therefore, a modular approach must be continued in face-to-face instruction even if the pandemic vanishes. Researchers may recommend to the faculty/teachers in Aumbay Elementary School to use modules so students can study in advance; teachers/faculty might monitor their student’s progress and be more flexible and even-minded in any situation to provide and help the students. Moreover, Schools may provide guidelines regarding the implementation of limited face-to-face and modular distance learning so that students can learn in different approaches; parents should also give attention to their children and support them in such activities. Furthermore, future researchers may incorporate other variables when they conduct a study related to our research.

Suggested Citation

  • Livelyn D. Argallon & Jaycee Rylle O. Loreño & Honey Jane C. Paham & Jovenil R. Bacatan, 2022. "Perceived Effects of Modular Distance Learning on the Students in Aumbay Elementary School," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(9), pages 496-506, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:6:y:2022:i:9:p:496-506
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-6-issue-9/496-506.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/virtual-library/papers/perceived-effects-of-modular-distance-learning-on-the-students-in-aumbay-elementary-school/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hamed Taherdoost, 2017. "Determining Sample Size; How to Calculate Survey Sample Size," Post-Print hal-02557333, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mai Mostafa Awad & Abd‘Elazez Hashem & Hend Mohamed Naguib, 2022. "The Impact of Lean Management Practices on Economic Sustainability in Services Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-27, July.
    2. Geoffrey Rogito Nyamotal & Dionysious Kihika Kiambi & Kirema Nkanata Mburugu, 2024. "Influence of Democratic Leadership Style on the Performance of Agricultural Enterprises in Kenya," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(6), pages 2441-2453, June.
    3. Thomas Odongo Ololo & Dr. Mary Anyango Onditi & Dr. Benard Mwebi, 2024. "Influence of Principals’ Allocation of Teaching and Learning Resources on Learners’ Academic Performance in Kenya Certificate of Secondary Education in Kisii County, Kenya," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(3s), pages 975-1004, March.
    4. Godwin Uzochukwu Nosiri & Alwell Nteegah & Monday Robinson & Ijeoma Kalu, 2021. "Government Agricultural Support Projects: Implications on Job Creation in Rivers State," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 5(12), pages 165-173, December.
    5. Reema Bera & Bhargab Maitra, 2021. "Analyzing Prospective Owners’ Choice Decision towards Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles in Urban India: A Stated Preference Discrete Choice Experiment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-24, July.
    6. Hamed Taherdoost, 2019. "What Is the Best Response Scale for Survey and Questionnaire Design; Review of Different Lengths of Rating Scale / Attitude Scale / Likert Scale," Post-Print hal-02557308, HAL.
    7. Juliana Melo & Ana Isabel Ribeiro & Susana Aznar & Andreia Pizarro & Maria Paula Santos, 2021. "Urban Green Spaces, Greenness Exposure and Species Richness in Residential Environments and Relations with Physical Activity and BMI in Portuguese Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-14, June.
    8. Majed Bin Othayman & Abdulrahim Meshari & John Mulyata & Yaw Debrah, 2021. "Challenges Experienced by Public Higher Education Institutions of Learning in the Implementation of Training and Development: A Case Study of Saudi Arabian Higher Education," Journal of Business Administration Research, Journal of Business Administration Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 10(2), pages 1-36, October.
    9. Sharma, Reema Bera & Majumdar, Bandhan Bandhu & Maitra, Bhargab, 2024. "Commuter and non-commuter preferences for plug-in hybrid electric vehicle: A case study of Delhi and Kolkata, India," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    10. Hamed Taherdoost, 2019. "What Is the Best Response Scale for Survey and Questionnaire Design; Review of Different Lengths of Rating Scale / Attitude Scale / Likert Scale," Post-Print hal-03741841, HAL.
    11. Paul Okello Atieno, 2023. "Peace Initiatives in Resource Based Conflicts in Post-Colonial Kenya: A Case of Lower Nyando River Basin of Kisumu County, Kenya," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 10(1), pages 110-120, January.
    12. Mallikarjun Patil & Bandhan Bandhu Majumdar & Prasanta Kumar Sahu & Long T. Truong, 2021. "Evaluation of Prospective Users’ Choice Decision toward Electric Two-Wheelers Using a Stated Preference Survey: An Indian Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-22, March.
    13. Maksymilian Czeczotko & Hanna Górska-Warsewicz & Wacław Laskowski & Barbara Rostecka, 2021. "Towards Sustainable Private Labels in an Autonomous Community during COVID-19—Analysis of Consumer Behavior and Perception on the Example of Tenerife," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-22, July.
    14. Marazi, Naveed Farooz & Majumdar, Bandhan Bandhu & Sahu, Prasanta K. & Potoglou, Dimitris, 2022. "Congestion pricing acceptability among commuters: An Indian perspective," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    15. Sajjad Alam & Zhang Jianhua & Jafar Hussain & Muhammad Usman Shahzad & Ahmad Ali, 2024. "The Inclusive Analysis of Green Technology Implementation Effect on Employee Knowledge, Health, Job Opportunities in the Production Houses," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 273-291, March.
    16. Ray, Arghya & Bala, Pradip Kumar & Chakraborty, Shibashish & Dasgupta, Shilpee A., 2021. "Exploring the impact of different factors on brand equity and intention to take up online courses from e-Learning platforms," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    17. Guillermo Bermúdez-González & Ana M. Lucia-Casademunt & Laura Padilla-Angulo, 2024. "What can talent management do about involuntary remote working in the post-COVID-19 era? Spanish IT employees’ organizational commitment," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    18. Sanjay SINGH & Shamila SINGH, 2019. "Supply Chain Management Practices: Impediments to Service Delivery in the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development," Expert Journal of Business and Management, Sprint Investify, vol. 7(2), pages 209-220.
    19. Subodh Khanal & Sunita Phago & Sharoj Raj Mishra & Hari Krishna Panta, 2021. "Status Of Capital Assets For Agricultural Sustainability In Gangajamuna Rural Municipality Dhading, Nepal," Sustainability in Food and Agriculture (SFNA), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 2(1), pages 44-47, January.
    20. Veronika Harantová & Alica Kalašová & Simona Skřivánek Kubíková & Jaroslav Mazanec & Radomíra Jordová, 2022. "The Impact of Mobility on Shopping Preferences during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Evidence from the Slovak Republic," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-27, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:6:y:2022:i:9:p:496-506. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.