IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02558508.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Material objets borrowing online platform and instrumental mechanisms : interpretation, manipulation and circumvention
[Plateforme de prêt d'objets et mécanismes instrumentaux : interprétation, manipulation et contournement]

Author

Listed:
  • Florent Boudot-Antoine

    (REGARDS - Recherches en Économie Gestion AgroRessources Durabilité Santé- EA 6292 - URCA - Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne - MSH-URCA - Maison des Sciences Humaines de Champagne-Ardenne - URCA - Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne)

  • Dominique Roux

    (REGARDS - Recherches en Économie Gestion AgroRessources Durabilité Santé- EA 6292 - URCA - Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne - MSH-URCA - Maison des Sciences Humaines de Champagne-Ardenne - URCA - Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne)

  • Christophe Benavent

    (CEROS - Centre d'Etudes et de Recherches sur les Organisations et la Stratégie - UPN - Université Paris Nanterre)

Abstract

Cet article s'intéresse au prêt d'objets matériels entre particuliers intermédié par une plateforme numérique. Alors que les recherches antérieures éludent la question du rôle de l'intermédiation des plateformes dans l'organisation de l'échange à travers la mise oeuvre de mécanismes instrumentaux, cet article s'appuie sur un cadre d'analyse de deux dimensions inhérentes, mais aussi essentielles aux plateformes, au système de prêt qui sont la confiance et la réciprocité. Cet article explore ensuite la manière dont les individus interprètent, dans leurs pratiques de prêt et/ou d'emprunt les mécanismes instrumentaux établis par la plateforme. L'analyse des seize entretiens auprès de répondants qui prêtent et/ou empruntent montre (1) la manière dont les plateformes organisent, en théorie, l'échange à travers la mise en place de ces mécanismes ; (2) comment les prêteurs, à travers leurs statuts de propriétaire, interprètent, manipulent ces droits mécanismes et, enfin, (3) la manière dont les usagers contournent ces mécanismes, conduisant à une autonomie des emprunteurs dans leurs pratiques de prêt. Ces trois temps permettent d'illustrer la manière dont cette série d'interprétations, de manipulations et de contournements débouche, en pratique, sur une co-organisation de l'échange au fil du temps.

Suggested Citation

  • Florent Boudot-Antoine & Dominique Roux & Christophe Benavent, 2017. "Material objets borrowing online platform and instrumental mechanisms : interpretation, manipulation and circumvention [Plateforme de prêt d'objets et mécanismes instrumentaux : interprétation, man," Post-Print hal-02558508, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02558508
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-02558508
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-02558508/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fleura Bardhi & Giana M. Eckhardt, 2012. "Access-Based Consumption: The Case of Car Sharing," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(4), pages 881-898.
    2. Giana M. Eckhardt & Fleura Bardhi, 2016. "The Relationship between Access Practices and Economic Systems," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(2), pages 210-225.
    3. Viviane Chen, 2009. "Possession and access : consumer desires and value perceptions regarding contemporary art collection and exhibit visits," Post-Print hal-00778657, HAL.
    4. Yu Chen, 2009. "Possession and Access: Consumer Desires and Value Perceptions Regarding Contemporary Art Collection and Exhibit Visits," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 35(6), pages 925-940, April.
    5. Isabelle Dabadie-Mounier & Philippe Robert Demontrond, 2016. "Posséder autrement: une approche socio-anthropologique de la consommation collaborative," Post-Print halshs-01525387, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jaakko Aspara & Kristina Wittkowski & Vicki G Morwitz & J Jeffrey Inman & Olivier Toubia, 2019. "Sharing-Dominant Logic? Quantifying the Association between Consumer Intelligence and Choice of Social Access Modes," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 46(2), pages 201-222.
    2. Linda L. Price & Russell W. Belk, 2016. "Consumer Ownership and Sharing: Introduction to the Issue," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(2), pages 193-197.
    3. Christodoulides, George & Athwal, Navdeep & Boukis, Achilleas & Semaan, Rania W., 2021. "New forms of luxury consumption in the sharing economy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 89-99.
    4. Alain Debenedetti & Harmen Oppewal & Zeynep Arsel, 2014. "Place Attachment in Commercial Settings: A Gift Economy Perspective," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 40(5), pages 904-923.
    5. Meina Zhao & Jing Wang & Heng Zhang & Gang Zhao, 2019. "ERP Perspective Analysis of PSS Component and Decision-Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, February.
    6. Park, Hyejune & Joyner Armstrong, Cosette M., 2019. "Will “no-ownership†work for apparel?: Implications for apparel retailers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 66-73.
    7. Friedrich Chasin & Moritz Hoffen & Marcus Cramer & Martin Matzner, 2018. "Peer-to-peer sharing and collaborative consumption platforms: a taxonomy and a reproducible analysis," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 293-325, May.
    8. Craig Standing & Ferry Jie & Thi Le & Susan Standing & Sharon Biermann, 2021. "Analysis of the Use and Perception of Shared Mobility: A Case Study in Western Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-14, August.
    9. Anna Jasinska-Biliczak, 2020. "TRIBE 2.0 – The Microcommunity Needs in the Frames of the Sharing Economy Concept," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 75-84.
    10. Mike Molesworth & Rebecca Watkins & Janice Denegri-Knott, 2016. "Possession Work on Hosted Digital Consumption Objects as Consumer Ensnarement," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(2), pages 246-261.
    11. Loussaïef, Leïla & Ulrich, Isabelle & Damay, Coralie, 2019. "How does access to luxury fashion challenge self-identity? Exploring women's practices of joint and non-ownership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 263-272.
    12. Hung-Tai Tsou & Ja-Shen Chen & Cindy Yunhsin Chou & Tzu-Wen Chen, 2019. "Sharing Economy Service Experience and Its Effects on Behavioral Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-25, September.
    13. Giovanna Magnani & Beatrice Re, 2020. "Lived experiences about car sharing in young adults: Emerging paradoxes," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2020(2), pages 207-229, September.
    14. Bruna Bruno & Marisa Faggini, 2017. "Sharing Economy: For an Economic Taxonomy," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(6), pages 174-178, June.
    15. Giovanna Magnani & Tommaso Bertolotti & Antonella Zucchella, 2018. "Cognitive aspects of car sharing in Millennials. Active sharers and reluctant users," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(1), pages 39-62.
    16. Jiong Sun & Hendrarto Supangkat & Siva Balasubramanian, 2016. "Peer-to-Peer Sharing of Private Goods: Sellers’ Response and Consumers’ Benefits," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(2), pages 262-276.
    17. Daniel Roos & Rüdiger Hahn, 2019. "Understanding Collaborative Consumption: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior with Value-Based Personal Norms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(3), pages 679-697, September.
    18. Luri Minami, Adriana & Ramos, Carla & Bruscato Bortoluzzo, Adriana, 2021. "Sharing economy versus collaborative consumption: What drives consumers in the new forms of exchange?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 124-137.
    19. Francesco Pasimeni, 2020. "The Origin of the Sharing Economy Meets the Legacy of Fractional Ownership," SPRU Working Paper Series 2020-19, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    20. Myriam Ertz & Fabien Durif & Manon Arcand, 2019. "A conceptual perspective on collaborative consumption," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(1), pages 27-41, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02558508. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.