IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02312095.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Team Exploratory and Exploitative Learning : Psychological Safety, Task Conflict, and Team Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Konstantinos Kostopoulos

    (EADA Business School Barchelona - EADA)

  • Nikos Bozionelos

    (Durham University)

Abstract

This study conceptualized exploratory and exploitative learning as distinct team-level activities, constructed measures of them, and examined their relationships with psychological safety, task conflict, and team performance. Structural equation analysis in a sample of 142 innovation project teams indicated that psychological safety was linearly and nonlinearly related to team exploitative and exploratory learning, respectively; whereas task conflict positively moderated the relationship between psychological safety and exploitative learning. Furthermore, exploratory and exploitative learning were additively related to team performance, as rated by team managers, and mediated its relationship with psychological safety. The findings contribute to understanding how and under what conditions organizational teams engage in exploratory and exploitative learning to maximize their performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Konstantinos Kostopoulos & Nikos Bozionelos, 2011. "Team Exploratory and Exploitative Learning : Psychological Safety, Task Conflict, and Team Performance," Post-Print hal-02312095, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02312095
    DOI: 10.1177/1059601111405985
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yingxin Deng & Weipeng Lin & Guiquan Li, 2022. "When and How Does Team Task Conflict Spark Team Innovation? A Contingency Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 181(3), pages 745-761, December.
    2. Ai-xiang Zheng, 2024. "Does learning ambidexterity affect the sense of urban integration among new-generation migrant workers in China? An empirical study based on career growth and environmental dynamism," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Gregory J. Harper & Roslyn Cameron & Christine Edwards, 2024. "A framework for the facilitation of accelerated leadership and management capability development in the workplace," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
    4. Jia Xu & Baoguo Xie & Bin Tang, 2020. "Guanxi HRM Practice and Employees’ Occupational Well-Being in China: A Multi-Level Psychological Process," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-15, April.
    5. Hai-Trung Nguyen & Hao-Chieh Lin & Shao-Chi Chang, 2023. "The emergence of TMT learning goal orientation: contextual effects of TMT demographic diversity on TMT cognitive processes," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(1), pages 26-54, February.
    6. Giannoccaro, Ilaria & Galesic, Mirta & Massari, Giovanni Francesco & Barkoczi, Daniel & Carbone, Giuseppe, 2020. "Search behavior of individuals working in teams: A behavioral study on complex landscapes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 507-516.
    7. Joanna Radomska & Przemysław Wołczek, 2020. "Integrative Perspective on Ambidexterity, Creativity and Networking: Literature Overview," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 31-49.
    8. Eldor, Liat & Hodor, Michal & Cappelli, Peter, 2023. "The limits of psychological safety: Nonlinear relationships with performance," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    9. Olga Kassotaki, 2022. "Review of Organizational Ambidexterity Research," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    10. Gayoung Kim & Woo Jin Lee & Hoshik Shim, 2022. "Managerial Dilemmas and Entrepreneurial Challenges in the Ambidexterity of SMEs: A Systematic Review for Execution System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-22, December.
    11. Secil Bulbul & Serin Isiacik & Serpil Aytac, 2022. "Measurement of Perceived Psychological Safety: Integration, Review and Evidences for the Scale in the Context of Turkey," Journal of Economy Culture and Society, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 65(65), pages 15-28, June.
    12. La Anh Duc & Nguyen Dinh Tho & Dilupa Nakandala & Yi-Chen Lan, 2020. "Team innovation in retail services: the role of ambidextrous leadership and team learning," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 14(1), pages 167-186, March.
    13. Sarpong, David & Maclean, Mairi, 2014. "Unpacking strategic foresight: A practice approach," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 16-26.
    14. Martin Owusu Ansah & Nicholas Addai-Boamah & Abeeku Bylon Bamfo & Lucy Afeafa Ry-Kottoh, 2022. "Organizational ambidexterity and financial performance in the banking industry: evidence from a developing economy," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(3), pages 250-263, September.
    15. Alessandro Cirillo & Luca Pennacchio & Maria Rosaria Carillo & Mauro Romano, 2021. "The antecedents of entrepreneurial risk-taking in private family firms: CEO seasons and contingency factors," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1571-1590, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02312095. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.