IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01878309.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Chef de guilde et entrepreneur-leader : des points de liaison pour quelle appréciation du risque ?

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-Pierre Dumazert

    (Sup de Co La Rochelle - Ecole Supérieure de Commerce de la Rochelle - Groupe Sup de Co La Rochelle, CORHIS - Communication, Ressources Humaines et Intervention Sociale - UPVM - Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 - UPVD - Université de Perpignan Via Domitia)

Abstract

Cet article présente notre recherche sur les mondes virtuels et plus particulièrement sur les Jeux Massivement Multi-Joueurs. Le questionnement tend à affiner la vision d'un chef de guilde, qualifié d'entrepreneur-leader sur des contrées virtuelles peu connues en général du chercheur en gestion ou du grand public. Le chef de guilde et son alterego dans le monde de l'entreprise (entrepreneur, manager, décideur), diffèrent sur de nombreux points bien que des éléments de liaison existent entre ces deux profils. Entre capacités (compétence) et vision managériale (objectifs, engagement), l'appréciation du risque amène à des constats parfois surprenants. Une méthodologie qualitative dévoile cette perception du risque sur les items étudiés, en exposant une liaison complexe entre le réel et le virtuel. Les résultats obtenus montrent une vision en opposition et consensus sur des critères clés tels que la réponse aux attentes des employés, la persuasion du leader, le partage de l'information, le fédérateur et le collectif, ainsi que l'accumulation des connaissances.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-Pierre Dumazert, 2012. "Chef de guilde et entrepreneur-leader : des points de liaison pour quelle appréciation du risque ?," Post-Print hal-01878309, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01878309
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01878309
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01878309/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thierry Verstraete & Alain Fayolle, 2005. "Paradigmes et entrepreneuriat," Revue de l'Entrepreneuriat, De Boeck Université, vol. 4(1), pages 33-52.
    2. Kenneth E. Knight, 1967. "A Descriptive Model of the Intra-Firm Innovation Process," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 40, pages 478-478.
    3. Jean-Pierre Dumazert, 2013. "Notion de risque sur les mondes virtuels : une approche par les jeux massivement multi-joueurs," Innovations, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(1), pages 33-50.
    4. Alain Fayolle & Thierry Verstraete, 2005. "Paradigmes et entrepreneuriat," Post-Print hal-02311654, HAL.
    5. Edward Castronova, 2003. "Theory of the Avatar," CESifo Working Paper Series 863, CESifo.
    6. Janney, Jay J. & Dess, Gregory G., 2006. "The risk concept for entrepreneurs reconsidered: New challenges to the conventional wisdom," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 385-400, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Délila Allam, 2011. "En toutes franchises : de la capacité d'obéissance à la capacité d'initiative," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00643792, HAL.
    2. Juan Morua Ramirez & Aramis Marin & Christophe Schmitt, 2015. "Comment entreprendre autrement ? L'apport de la complexité dans les projets entrepreneuriaux," Post-Print hal-01698262, HAL.
    3. Pene Zongabiro Nina Pelagie, 2014. "The Contribution of Village Palm Grove to the Cameroonian Rural Economic Development," Research in World Economy, Research in World Economy, Sciedu Press, vol. 5(2), pages 159-168, September.
    4. Débora Allam-Firley, 2018. "Stratégies mises en œuvre par les entrepreneurs dans les pays émergents et territoires insulaires dans le processus d’innovation : proposition d’un cadre d’analyse," Post-Print hal-02994287, HAL.
    5. Délila Allam, 2011. "En toutes franchises : de la capacité d'obéissance à la capacité d'initiative," Post-Print halshs-00643792, HAL.
    6. Marie Perez & Bernard Quinio & Sy Shérif, 2015. "L’entrepreneuriat universitaire au travers le prisme des options réelles," Post-Print hal-01529029, HAL.
    7. Martine Spence & Jouhaina Ben Boubaker Gherib & Viviane Ondoua Biwolé, 2011. "Sustainable Entrepreneurship: Is Entrepreneurial will Enough? A North–South Comparison," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 99(3), pages 335-367, March.
    8. Matouk Belattaf & Nacéra Nasroun, 2013. "Entrepreneuriat et création d'entreprises. Facteurs déterminant l'esprit d'entreprise : cas de Béjaïa," Post-Print halshs-01860090, HAL.
    9. Mamadou Ndione & Slimane Haddadj, 2020. "Échecs des différentes politiques d'octroi des crédits destinées aux entrepreneurs du secteur moderne des pays en développement: le cas du Sénégal," Post-Print hal-02960215, HAL.
    10. Laurentiu Tachiciu & Vasile Dinu & Iacob Kerbalek, 2011. "Quality Uncertainty as a Barrier to Business Services Development," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(Special N), pages 712-724, November.
    11. Jérôme Gonthier & Gabriel M. Chirita, 2019. "The role of corporate incubators as invigorators of innovation capabilities in parent companies," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-21, December.
    12. Murphy Patrick J. & Pollack Jeff & Nagy Brian & Rutherford Matthew & Coombes Susan, 2019. "Risk Tolerance, Legitimacy, and Perspective: Navigating Biases in Social Enterprise Evaluations," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 9(4), pages 1-19, October.
    13. Cécile Fonrouge & Cécile Ayerbe, 2005. "Les transitions entre innovations : études de cas et proposition d'une grille d'interprétation," Post-Print halshs-00696111, HAL.
    14. Zellweger, Thomas & Sieger, Philipp & Halter, Frank, 2011. "Should I stay or should I go? Career choice intentions of students with family business background," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 26(5), pages 521-536, September.
    15. Hervas-Oliver, Jose-Luis & Sempere-Ripoll, Francisca & Boronat-Moll, Carles, 2012. "Process innovation objectives and management complementarities: patterns, drivers, co-adoption and performance effects," MERIT Working Papers 2012-051, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    16. Mattias Brachert & Walter Hyll, 2014. "On the Stability of Preferences: Repercussions of Entrepreneurship on Risk Attitudes," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 667, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    17. Kotsemir, Maxim & Meissner, Dirk, 2013. "Conceptualizing the Innovation Process – Trends and Outlook," MPRA Paper 46504, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Li-Min Chuang & Wen-Chia Tsai, 2014. "The Organizational Innovativeness Inventory for information and electronic enterprises: Development and Validation," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 6(4), pages 302-309.
    19. Haner, Udo-Ernst, 2002. "Innovation quality--a conceptual framework," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(1), pages 31-37, November.
    20. Sonia Adam-Ledunois & Sébastien Damart, 2016. "Innovation managériale… ou pas ? Design d'une méthodologie d'analyse critique des objets de management," Post-Print hal-01780623, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01878309. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.