IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/exe/wpaper/1701.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Does formative feedback help or hinder students? An empirical investigation

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos Cortinhas

    (Department of Economics, University of Exeter)

Abstract

The link between formative assessment and student performance is not entirely clear in the existing literature with some previous studies showing contradicting results. Although the debate is very old (since mid-1800s), previous research is almost exclusively based on elementary and secondary school students. This paper attempts to add to the existing literature by focusing on data from a large scale experiment (a class of 578 UK first year undergraduate students enrolled on Introduction to Statistics) to determine whether online, formative (non-compulsory) homework helps or hinders students. The results suggest that completing formative assessment tasks contributes to higher grades but only for good students. The result is robust to a variety of specifications and after controlling for a large number of student characteristics (including nationality, gender, ethnicity, whether a student has completed a Maths or Economics A-Level in Secondary School, amongst others) and the level of student ability/effort. This study shows, therefore, that formative homework might contribute to amplifying inequalities amongst students and that other strategies are needed to close the gap between the top and bottom performing students.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlos Cortinhas, 2017. "Does formative feedback help or hinder students? An empirical investigation," Discussion Papers 1701, University of Exeter, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:exe:wpaper:1701
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://exetereconomics.github.io/RePEc/dpapers/DP1701.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kristof De Witte & Chris Van Klaveren, 2014. "How are teachers teaching? A nonparametric approach," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 3-23, February.
    2. William Lee & Richard H. Courtney & Steven J. Balassi, 2010. "Do Online Homework Tools Improve Student Results in Principles of Microeconomics Courses?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(2), pages 283-286, May.
    3. Rønning, Marte, 2011. "Who benefits from homework assignments?," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 55-64, February.
    4. Torberg Falch & Marte Rønning, 2011. "Homework assignment and student achievement in OECD countries," Working Paper Series 11411, Department of Economics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
    5. Rhodes, M. Taylor & Sarbaum, Jeffrey K., 2013. "Online Homework Management Systems: Should We Allow Multiple Attempts?," UNCG Economics Working Papers 13-14, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Department of Economics.
    6. Eren, Ozkan & Henderson, Daniel J., 2011. "Are we wasting our children's time by giving them more homework?," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 950-961, October.
    7. Dahlgran, Roger A., 2008. "Online Homework for Agricultural Economics Instruction: Frankenstein’s Monster or Robo TA?," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 40(1), pages 1-12, April.
    8. William Neilson, 2005. "Homework and performance for time-constrained students," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 9(1), pages 1-6.
    9. repec:cup:jagaec:v:40:y:2008:i:1:p:105-116_11 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Wayne Joerding, 2010. "Teaching and Learning with Individually Unique Exercises," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(2), pages 125-135, March.
    11. A. Colin Cameron & Douglas L. Miller, 2015. "A Practitioner’s Guide to Cluster-Robust Inference," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 50(2), pages 317-372.
    12. Austin Nichols & Mark E Schaffer, 2007. "Clustered standard errors in Stata," United Kingdom Stata Users' Group Meetings 2007 07, Stata Users Group.
    13. Jeffrey Parker, 2010. "An Empirical Examination of the Roles of Ability and Gender in Collaborative Homework Assignments," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(1), pages 15-30, January.
    14. Steve Trost & Djavad Salehi-Isfahani, 2012. "Targeting Teaching The Effect of Homework on Exam Performance: Experimental Results from Principles of Economics," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 79(1), pages 224-242, July.
    15. M. Taylor Rhodes & Jeffrey K. Sarbaum, 2015. "Online Homework Management Systems: Should we Allow Multiple Attempts?," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 60(2), pages 120-131, September.
    16. Dahlgran, Roger A., 2008. "Online Homework for Agricultural Economics Instruction: Frankenstein's Monster or Robo TA?," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 40(1), pages 105-116, April.
    17. Ozkan Eren & Daniel J. Henderson, 2008. "The impact of homework on student achievement," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 11(2), pages 326-348, July.
    18. Self, Sharmistha, 2013. "Utilizing online tools to measure effort: Does it really improve student outcome?," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 14(C), pages 36-45.
    19. Andrew Grodner & Nicholas G. Rupp, 2013. "The Role of Homework in Student Learning Outcomes: Evidence from a Field Experiment," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(2), pages 93-109, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Torberg Falch & Marte Rønning, 2011. "Homework assignment and student achievement in OECD countries," Working Paper Series 11411, Department of Economics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
    2. Fulya Ersoy, 2021. "Returns to effort: experimental evidence from an online language platform," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 24(3), pages 1047-1073, September.
    3. Hadsell, Lester, 2020. "Not for want of trying: Effort and Success of women in principles of microeconomics," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    4. Fungáčová, Zuzana & Shamshur, Anastasiya & Weill, Laurent, 2017. "Does bank competition reduce cost of credit? Cross-country evidence from Europe," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 104-120.
    5. M. Taylor Rhodes & Jeffrey K. Sarbaum, 2015. "Online Homework Management Systems: Should we Allow Multiple Attempts?," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 60(2), pages 120-131, September.
    6. Pratobevera, Giuseppe, 2022. "Homework and finance students’ learning and achievement," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 46(PB).
    7. Eren, Ozkan & Henderson, Daniel J., 2011. "Are we wasting our children's time by giving them more homework?," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 950-961, October.
    8. Olszak, Małgorzata & Kowalska, Iwona, 2022. "Does bank competition matter for the effects of macroprudential policy on the procyclicality of lending?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    9. Caetano, Carolina & Caetano, Gregorio & Nielsen, Eric, 2024. "Are children spending too much time on enrichment activities?," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    10. Wuthisatian, Rattaphon, 2020. "Student exam performance in different proctored environments: Evidence from an online economics course," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    11. Wuttiporn Suamuang & Surachai Suksakulchai & Matthew A. Easter, 2018. "Relationship between Gender, Year Levels, Assignment Completion and Academic Achievement for College Students," Proceedings of the 11th International RAIS Conference, November 19-20, 2018 015WS, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.
    12. José Antonio Molina Marfil & Oscar David Marcenaro Gutierrez & Ana Martín Marcos, 2016. "Procesos de enseñanza-aprendizaje y producción educativa: un análisis de la competencia matemática," Investigaciones de Economía de la Educación volume 11, in: José Manuel Cordero Ferrera & Rosa Simancas Rodríguez (ed.), Investigaciones de Economía de la Educación 11, edition 1, volume 11, chapter 32, pages 585-604, Asociación de Economía de la Educación.
    13. Heiko T. Burret & Lars P. Feld, 2018. "Vertical effects of fiscal rules: the Swiss experience," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 25(3), pages 673-721, June.
    14. Zhao, Liange & Yuan, Hongbin & Wang, Xueyuan, 2024. "Impact of homework time on adolescent mental health: Evidence from China," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    15. Miao Wang & Hong Zhuang, 2022. "Effect of official development assistance on adolescent fertility rate: within-country evidence," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 42(2), pages 566-590.
    16. Schwartz, Joseph A. & Allen, Samantha L., 2024. "The accumulated impact of direct and indirect workplace violence exposure on mental health and physiological activity among correctional officers," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    17. Jongmoo Jay Choi & Hoje Jo & Jimi Kim & Moo Sung Kim, 2018. "Business Groups and Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(4), pages 931-954, December.
    18. Kathy K. Archer, 2018. "Do Multiple Homework Attempts Increase Student Learning? A Quantitative Study," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 63(2), pages 260-269, October.
    19. Clément de Chaisemartin & Jaime Ramirez-Cuellar, 2024. "At What Level Should One Cluster Standard Errors in Paired and Small-Strata Experiments?," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 16(1), pages 193-212, January.
    20. Francesca Carta & Lucia Rizzica, 2015. "Female employment and pre-kindergarten: on the uninteded effects of an Italian reform," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 1030, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    homework; online learning; formative assessment.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C21 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Cross-Sectional Models; Spatial Models; Treatment Effect Models
    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education
    • I24 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Education and Inequality

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:exe:wpaper:1701. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sebastian Kripfganz (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deexeuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.