IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehu/biltok/5729.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Índices de Satisfacción del Consumidor: una aplicación de Modelos de Ecuaciones Estructurales a la Industria Automovilística Española

Author

Listed:
  • López Caro, Cristina María
  • Fernández Aguirre, María Carmen
  • Mariel Chladkova, Petr

Abstract

El objetivo del presente trabajo es la obtención de la variable latente Satisfacción Global del Consumidor (SGC), a partir de 25 indicadores proporcionados por la revista Autopista para 130 modelos de coches. La metodología empleada es la modelización mediante Sistemas de Ecuaciones Estructurales basándonos en consideraciones teóricas y en las variables latentes observadas en un Análisis Factorial Exploratorio previo. Cómo resultado se obtienen tres factores de satisfacción del consumidor en los que subyacen los siguientes factores parciales: Apariencia, Comportamiento, Economía, Prestaciones técnicas, Potencia y Habitabilidad. Los dos primeros factores se establecen como modelos de Análisis Factorial Confirmatorio de segundo orden. Las conclusiones de este trabajo permiten una mejor comprensión de las dimensiones de la satisfacción del consumidor y una mejora en la estimación de los índices.

Suggested Citation

  • López Caro, Cristina María & Fernández Aguirre, María Carmen & Mariel Chladkova, Petr, 2002. "Índices de Satisfacción del Consumidor: una aplicación de Modelos de Ecuaciones Estructurales a la Industria Automovilística Española," BILTOKI 1134-8984, Universidad del País Vasco - Departamento de Economía Aplicada III (Econometría y Estadística).
  • Handle: RePEc:ehu:biltok:5729
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://addi.ehu.es/handle/10810/5729
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Claes Fornell & Youjae Yi, 1992. "Assumptions of the Two-Step Approach to Latent Variable Modeling," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 20(3), pages 291-320, February.
    2. Richard P. Bagozzi, 1983. "A Holistic Methodology for Modeling Consumer Response to Innovation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 128-176, February.
    3. Claes Fornell, 1995. "The Quality of Economic Output: Empirical Generalizations About Its Distribution and Relationship to Market Share," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(3_supplem), pages 203-211.
    4. Gerbing, David W & Anderson, James C, 1984. "On the Meaning of Within-Factor Correlated Measurement Errors," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 11(1), pages 572-580, June.
    5. Bagozzi, Richard P, 1983. "Issues in the Application of Covariance Structure Analysis: A Further Comment," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 9(4), pages 449-450, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jean-Pierre Lévy Mangin & Jaime de Pablo Valenciano & Tamás Koplyay, 2009. "Modeling Distribution Channel Dynamics of North American Cars in the Spanish Automobile Industry," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 15(2), pages 186-206, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim, Wonyoung & Jun, Ho Mun & Walker, Matthew & Drane, Dan, 2015. "Evaluating the perceived social impacts of hosting large-scale sport tourism events: Scale development and validation," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 21-32.
    2. Gordon W. Cheung & Helena D. Cooper-Thomas & Rebecca S. Lau & Linda C. Wang, 2024. "Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 745-783, June.
    3. Piotr Tarka, 2018. "An overview of structural equation modeling: its beginnings, historical development, usefulness and controversies in the social sciences," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 313-354, January.
    4. de Ruyter, Ko & Wetzels, Martin, 1998. "On the complex nature of patient evaluations of general practice service," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 19(5), pages 565-590, October.
    5. G. Tomas M. Hult & Forrest V. Morgeson III & Udit Sharma & Claes Fornell, 2022. "Customer satisfaction and international business: A multidisciplinary review and avenues for research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(8), pages 1695-1733, October.
    6. Justina GineikienÄ—, 2013. "Consumer Nostalgia Literature Review And An Alternative Measurement Perspective," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 4(2).
    7. Golossenko, Artyom & Pillai, Kishore Gopalakrishna & Aroean, Lukman, 2020. "Seeing brands as humans: Development and validation of a brand anthropomorphism scale," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 737-755.
    8. Jurlin, Kresimir & Malekovic, Sanja & Puljiz, Jaksa & Cziraky, Dario & Polic, Mario, 2002. "Covariance structure analysis of regional development data: an application to municipality development assessment," ERSA conference papers ersa02p469, European Regional Science Association.
    9. Michael Hennessy & Amy Bleakley & Martin Fishbein, 2012. "Measurement Models for Reasoned Action Theory," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 640(1), pages 42-57, March.
    10. Junwei Zheng & Guangdong Wu, 2018. "Work-Family Conflict, Perceived Organizational Support and Professional Commitment: A Mediation Mechanism for Chinese Project Professionals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-23, February.
    11. Noor Ul Hadi & Nadia Aslam & Amir Gulzar, 2019. "Sustainable Service Quality and Customer Loyalty: The Role of Customer Satisfaction and Switching Costs in the Pakistan Cellphone Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, April.
    12. Mercy Gloria Ashepet & Liesbet Vranken & Caroline Michellier & Olivier Dewitte & Rodgers Mutyebere & Clovis Kabaseke & Ronald Twongyirwe & Violet Kanyiginya & Grace Kagoro-Rugunda & Tine Huyse & Liesb, 2024. "Assessing scale reliability in citizen science motivational research: lessons learned from two case studies in Uganda," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    13. Xing Aijing & Nobuhiko Terui & P.K.Kannan, 2016. "How customer satisfaction affects loyalty: Insights from nonlinear hierarchical Bayes modeling of customer satisfaction index," TMARG Discussion Papers 124, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Tohoku University.
    14. Pereira, Arun & Hsu, Chin-Chun & Kundu, Sumit K., 2005. "Country-of-origin image: measurement and cross-national testing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 103-106, January.
    15. Grigoroudis, E. & Siskos, Y., 2004. "A survey of customer satisfaction barometers: Some results from the transportation-communications sector," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(2), pages 334-353, January.
    16. André Pirralha & Wiebke Weber, 2020. "Correction for measurement error in invariance testing: An illustration using SQP," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, October.
    17. Morwitz, Vicki G. & Steckel, Joel H. & Gupta, Alok, 2007. "When do purchase intentions predict sales?," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 347-364.
    18. Nagengast, Liane & Evanschitzky, Heiner & Blut, Markus & Rudolph, Thomas, 2014. "New Insights in the Moderating Effect of Switching Costs on the Satisfaction–Repurchase Behavior Link," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 90(3), pages 408-427.
    19. Hannah, Sean T. & Avolio, Bruce J. & Walumbwa, Fred O. & Chan, Adrian, 2012. "Leader Self and Means Efficacy: A multi-component approach," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 118(2), pages 143-161.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehu:biltok:5729. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alcira Macías (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deehues.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.