IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/toh/tmarga/124.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How customer satisfaction affects loyalty: Insights from nonlinear hierarchical Bayes modeling of customer satisfaction index

Author

Listed:
  • Xing Aijing
  • Nobuhiko Terui
  • P.K.Kannan

Abstract

The paper investigates the nonlinear relationship between customer satisfaction and loyalty. We extend the relationship proposed by the customer satisfaction index (CSI) model to include a nonlinear functional form between satisfaction and loyalty. We examine different functional forms on how satisfaction affects loyalty and propose a model that reflects intrinsic characteristics of nonlinear effects, such as saturation-attainable limit of effectiveness, non-constant marginal return, and asymmetric response between satisfied and dissatisfied customers, in a parsimonious way. The model is estimated via a hierarchical Bayes model to accommodate structural heterogeneity of companies surveyed in the analysis. The key contributions of the paper include a nonlinear structural equation model that includes nonlinear term of endogenous latent variable and an efficient algorithm of MCMC in terms of multi-move sampler by using Gibbs sampling. The empirical analysis by using survey data shows that (1) hierarchical Bayes models estimated by borrowing other companys' data are better than the independent model using their own data in terms of not only goodness of fit measures but also in the number of significant model estimates, (2) nonlinear models perform better than linear models, (3) nonlinear model with asymmetric marginal returns and attainable limits is found to be the best model. The managerial implications for loyalty management include: (i) there are limits to attainable levels of loyalty through satisfaction; (ii) the phenomenon of loss aversion is observed in customers' responses; (iii) marginal return of satisfaction is asymmetric across satisfied and dissatisfied customers, i.e., increasing for dissatisfied customers and decreasing for satisfied customers, (iv) in general, direct effect of satisfaction is more significant than indirect effect through recommendation intention. Finally, based on the estimated response curve of loyalty as a function of satisfaction and the empirical distribution of customers on the dimensions of CSI scores, we evaluate the efficiency of loyalty programs under assumptions of full and limited access to customers.

Suggested Citation

  • Xing Aijing & Nobuhiko Terui & P.K.Kannan, 2016. "How customer satisfaction affects loyalty: Insights from nonlinear hierarchical Bayes modeling of customer satisfaction index," TMARG Discussion Papers 124, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Tohoku University.
  • Handle: RePEc:toh:tmarga:124
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10097/63822
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Claes Fornell & Birger Wernerfelt, 1988. "A Model for Customer Complaint Management," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(3), pages 287-298.
    2. Sunil Gupta & Valarie Zeithaml, 2006. "Customer Metrics and Their Impact on Financial Performance," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 718-739, 11-12.
    3. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    4. Claes Fornell & Youjae Yi, 1992. "Assumptions of the Two-Step Approach to Latent Variable Modeling," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 20(3), pages 291-320, February.
    5. Claes Fornell & Youjae Yi, 1992. "Assumptions of the Two-Step Approach," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 20(3), pages 334-339, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ruth N. Bolton, 1998. "A Dynamic Model of the Duration of the Customer's Relationship with a Continuous Service Provider: The Role of Satisfaction," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 45-65.
    2. Watson, George F. & Worm, Stefan & Palmatier, Robert W. & Ganesan, Shankar, 2015. "The Evolution of Marketing Channels: Trends and Research Directions," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 91(4), pages 546-568.
    3. de Jong, A. & Dijk, R., 1998. "Determinants of Leverage and Agency problems," Discussion Paper 1998-82, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    4. Frambach, R.T. & Prabhu, J.C. & Verhallen, T.M.M., 1998. "The influence of business strategy on market orientation and new product activity," Discussion Paper 1998-91, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    5. Philipp Schmitt & Steffen Meyer & Bernd Skiera, 2010. "Überprüfung des Zusammenhangs zwischen Weiterempfehlungsbereitschaft und Kundenwert," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 62(1), pages 30-59, February.
    6. Lhoest-Snoeck, Sietske & van Nierop, Erjen & Verhoef, Peter C., 2014. "For New Customers Only: A Study on the Effect of Acquisition Campaigns on a Service Company's Existing Customers' CLV," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 210-224.
    7. Seow Eng Ong & Davin Wang & Calvin Chua, 2023. "Disruptive Innovation and Real Estate Agency: The Disruptee Strikes Back," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 67(2), pages 287-317, August.
    8. Christiane Goodfellow & Dirk Schiereck & Steffen Wippler, 2013. "Are behavioural finance equity funds a superior investment? A note on fund performance and market efficiency," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 14(2), pages 111-119, April.
    9. Philippe Fevrier & Sebastien Gay, 2005. "Informed Consent Versus Presumed Consent The Role of the Family in Organ Donations," HEW 0509007, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Shuang Yao & Donghua Yu & Yan Song & Hao Yao & Yuzhen Hu & Benhai Guo, 2018. "Dry Bulk Carrier Investment Selection through a Dual Group Decision Fusing Mechanism in the Green Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-19, November.
    11. Senik, Claudia, 2009. "Direct evidence on income comparisons and their welfare effects," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 408-424, October.
    12. Jose Apesteguia & Miguel Ballester, 2009. "A theory of reference-dependent behavior," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 40(3), pages 427-455, September.
    13. Shoji, Isao & Kanehiro, Sumei, 2016. "Disposition effect as a behavioral trading activity elicited by investors' different risk preferences," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 104-112.
    14. Christoph Engel & Michael Kurschilgen, 2011. "Fairness Ex Ante and Ex Post: Experimentally Testing Ex Post Judicial Intervention into Blockbuster Deals," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(4), pages 682-708, December.
    15. Venkatesh Shankar & Pablo Azar & Matthew Fuller, 2008. "—: A Multicategory Brand Equity Model and Its Application at Allstate," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 567-584, 07-08.
    16. Christina Leuker & Thorsten Pachur & Ralph Hertwig & Timothy J. Pleskac, 2019. "Do people exploit risk–reward structures to simplify information processing in risky choice?," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 5(1), pages 76-94, August.
    17. Boone, Jan & Sadrieh, Abdolkarim & van Ours, Jan C., 2009. "Experiments on unemployment benefit sanctions and job search behavior," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(8), pages 937-951, November.
    18. Singal, Vijay & Xu, Zhaojin, 2011. "Selling winners, holding losers: Effect on fund flows and survival of disposition-prone mutual funds," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 2704-2718, October.
    19. Jos'e Cl'audio do Nascimento, 2019. "Behavioral Biases and Nonadditive Dynamics in Risk Taking: An Experimental Investigation," Papers 1908.01709, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2023.
    20. Alex Cukierman & Anton Muscatelli, 2001. "Do Central Banks have Precautionary Demands for Expansions and for Price Stability?," Working Papers 2002_4, Business School - Economics, University of Glasgow, revised Mar 2002.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:toh:tmarga:124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tohoku University Library (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fetohjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.