IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/30020.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Employer-supported volunteering benefits: gift exchange among employers, employees, and volunteer organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Booth, Jonathan E.
  • Park, Kyoung Won
  • Glomb, Theresa M.

Abstract

Using gift exchange theory to explain the growing trend of employers offering employer-supported volunteering (ESV) benefits, this article discusses the creation of exchange relationships between the employer and employee and between the volunteer organization and employee. Hypotheses derived from the employee's perspective are tested with a nationally representative sample of volunteers (n=3,658). Findings suggest that ESV benefits are positively related to hours volunteered by the employee. Volunteer hours predict employee perceptions of skill acquisition, and such perceptions are positively related to perceptions of job success and employer recognition. We discuss the implications of these findings for business, employees, and volunteer organizations, with an emphasis on human resource management policy and practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Booth, Jonathan E. & Park, Kyoung Won & Glomb, Theresa M., 2009. "Employer-supported volunteering benefits: gift exchange among employers, employees, and volunteer organizations," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 30020, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:30020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/30020/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lilach Nachum, 2003. "Liability of foreignness in global competition? Financial service affiliates in the city of London," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(12), pages 1187-1208, December.
    2. Sherry, John F, Jr, 1983. "Gift Giving in Anthropological Perspective," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 10(2), pages 157-168, September.
    3. Belk, Russell W & Coon, Gregory S, 1993. "Gift Giving as Agapic Love: An Alternative to the Exchange Paradigm Based on Dating Experiences," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(3), pages 393-417, December.
    4. Freeman, Richard B, 1997. "Working for Nothing: The Supply of Volunteer Labor," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 15(1), pages 140-166, January.
    5. George A. Akerlof, 1982. "Labor Contracts as Partial Gift Exchange," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 97(4), pages 543-569.
    6. Field, David & Johnson, Ian, 1993. "Satisfaction and change: A survey of volunteers in a hospice organisation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 1625-1633, June.
    7. Kathleen Day & Rose Annue Devlin, 1998. "The Payoff to Work without Pay: Volunteer Work as an Investment in Human Capital," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 31(5), pages 1179-1191, November.
    8. Jarvis, Cheryl Burke & MacKenzie, Scott B & Podsakoff, Philip M, 2003. "A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 30(2), pages 199-218, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. María Isabel Saz-Gil & José Paulo Cosenza & Anabel Zardoya-Alegría & Ana I. Gil-Lacruz, 2020. "Exploring Corporate Social Responsibility under the Background of Sustainable Development Goals: A Proposal to Corporate Volunteering," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Susan van Schie & Arthur Gautier & Anne-Claire Pache & Stefan T. Güntert, 2019. "What Keeps Corporate Volunteers Engaged: Extending the Volunteer Work Design Model with Self-determination Theory Insights," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(3), pages 693-712, December.
    3. Gabriel Koman & Patrik Boršoš & Milan Kubina, 2024. "Sustainable Human Resource Management with a Focus on Corporate Employee Recruitment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-21, July.
    4. Brian D. Knox, 2020. "Employee Volunteer Programs are Associated with Firm-Level Benefits and CEO Incentives: Data on the Ethical Dilemma of Corporate Social Responsibility Activities," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 162(2), pages 449-472, March.
    5. Sandrine Frémeaux & Grant Michelson, 2011. "‘No Strings Attached’: Welcoming the Existential Gift in Business," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 99(1), pages 63-75, March.
    6. Jaroslav Mazanec, 2022. "Corporate Volunteering as a Current Phenomenon in Corporate Social Responsibility to Support the Career Development and Professional Skills of Employees during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of t," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, April.
    7. Aldona Glińska-Neweś & Joanna Górka, 2020. "Capabilities of Corporate Volunteering in Strengthening Social Capital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-11, September.
    8. Hu, Jia & Jiang, Kaifeng & Mo, Shenjiang & Chen, Honghui & Shi, Junqi, 2016. "The motivational antecedents and performance consequences of corporate volunteering: When do employees volunteer and when does volunteering help versus harm work performance?," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 99-111.
    9. Muddassar Sarfraz & Wang Qun & Muhammad Ibrahim Abdullah & Adnan Tariq Alvi, 2018. "Employees’ Perception of Corporate Social Responsibility Impact on Employee Outcomes: Mediating Role of Organizational Justice for Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    10. Guglielmo Faldetta, 2011. "The Logic of Gift and Gratuitousness in Business Relationships," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 100(1), pages 67-77, March.
    11. Chieh-Peng Lin & Yuan-Hui Tsai & Sheng-Wuu Joe & Chou-Kang Chiu, 2012. "Modeling the Relationship Among Perceived Corporate Citizenship, Firms’ Attractiveness, and Career Success Expectation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 105(1), pages 83-93, January.
    12. Gatignon-Turnau, Anne-Laure & Mignonac, Karim, 2015. "(Mis)Using employee volunteering for public relations: Implications for corporate volunteers' organizational commitment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 7-18.
    13. Sehrish Ilyas & Mattiullah Butt & Fouzia Ashfaq & Daniela Acquadro Maran, 2020. "Drivers for Non-Profits’ Success: Volunteer Engagement and Financial Sustainability Practices through the Resource Dependence Theory," Economies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-17, November.
    14. Liu Lili & Cui Yingjin, 2020. "An Empirical Investigation of Chinese College Students in Volunteer Teaching Activities: Dilemmas, Challenges, and Solutions," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, June.
    15. Cycyota, Cynthia S. & Ferrante, Claudia J. & Schroeder, Jessica M., 2016. "Corporate social responsibility and employee volunteerism: What do the best companies do?," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 59(3), pages 321-329.
    16. Iwona Escher & Pawel Brzustewicz, 2020. "Inter-Organizational Collaboration on Projects Supporting Sustainable Development Goals: The Company Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-26, June.
    17. Karl Pajo & Louise Lee, 2011. "Corporate-Sponsored Volunteering: A Work Design Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 99(3), pages 467-482, March.
    18. Daniela Lup & Jonathan E. Booth, 2019. "Work and Volunteering: Longitudinal Relationships between Work‐Related Experiences and Volunteering Behaviour," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 57(3), pages 599-623, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sandrine Frémeaux & Grant Michelson, 2011. ""No Strings Attached": Welcoming the Existential Gift in Business," Post-Print hal-00797037, HAL.
    2. Sandrine Frémeaux & Grant Michelson, 2011. "‘No Strings Attached’: Welcoming the Existential Gift in Business," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 99(1), pages 63-75, March.
    3. Chen, Ning & Petersen, Francine E. & Lowrey, Tina M., 2022. "The effect of altruistic gift giving on self-indulgence in affordable luxury," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 84-94.
    4. Eva Macková & Vojtech Stanek, 2005. "Teoretické prístupy k ekonomike dobrovoľníctva ako fenoménu sociálnej práce [Theoretical approaches to the economics of volunteering as a social labour phenomenon]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2005(5), pages 634-645.
    5. Russell Belk, 2007. "Why Not Share Rather Than Own?," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 611(1), pages 126-140, May.
    6. Aoki, Yu, 2014. "Donating Time to Charity: Not Working for Nothing," IZA Discussion Papers 7990, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    7. Olaf Hübler, 2023. "Donations, volunteering, and life satisfaction in Germany," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 43(4), pages 1908-1927.
    8. Vanhamme, Joëlle & de Bont, Cees J.P.M., 2008. "“Surprise Gift” Purchases: Customer Insights from the Small Electrical Appliances Market," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 84(3), pages 354-369.
    9. Damiano Fiorillo, 2011. "Do Monetary Rewards Crowd Out The Intrinsic Motivation Of Volunteers? Some Empirical Evidence For Italian Volunteers," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 82(2), pages 139-165, June.
    10. Prouteau, Lionel & Wolff, François-Charles, 2008. "On the relational motive for volunteer work," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 314-335, June.
    11. Franz Hackl & Martin Halla & Gerald J. Pruckner, 2007. "Volunteering and Income – The Fallacy of the Good Samaritan?," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(1), pages 77-104, February.
    12. Lionel Prouteau & François‐Charles Wolff, 2004. "Relational Goods and Associational Participation," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(3), pages 431-463, September.
    13. Cheng, Andong & Meloy, Margaret G. & Polman, Evan, 2021. "Picking Gifts for Picky People," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 97(2), pages 191-206.
    14. Cappellari, Lorenzo & Ghinetti, Paolo & Turati, Gilberto, 2011. "On time and money donations," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 853-867.
    15. Reshadi, Farnoush, 2023. "Failing to give the gift of improvement: When and why givers withhold self-improvement gifts," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    16. Slim, Sadri, 2009. "Du refus de vente au don: une explication de la formation du prix par l´affect [From rejection of exchange to gift: regard as an explanation of prices]," MPRA Paper 15317, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 24 Apr 2009.
    17. Suzanne Clain & Charles Zech, 2008. "Determinants of the Allocation of Volunteer Time: Church-Related versus Other Non-market Activities," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 36(4), pages 455-467, December.
    18. Guido Cozzi & Noemi Mantovan & Robert M. Sauer, 2017. "Does it Pay to Work for Free? Negative Selection and the Wage Returns to Volunteer Experience," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 79(6), pages 1018-1045, December.
    19. Schiffman, Leon G. & Cohn, Deborah Y., 2009. "Are they playing by the same rules? A consumer gifting classification of marital dyads," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(11), pages 1054-1062, November.
    20. Robert M. Sauer, 2015. "Does It Pay For Women To Volunteer?," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 56(2), pages 537-564, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    employer-supported volunteering; employer-supported volunteer programs; volunteer; nonprofit; human capital; socioeconomic achievement; compensation and benefits; training and development; strategic HR;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R14 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Land Use Patterns
    • J01 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General - - - Labor Economics: General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:30020. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.