IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/124587.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Beyond Pearson’s correlation: modern nonparametric independence tests for psychological research

Author

Listed:
  • Karch, Julian D.
  • Perez-Alonso, Andres F.
  • Bergsma, Wicher P.

Abstract

When examining whether two continuous variables are associated, tests based on Pearson’s, Kendall’s, and Spearman’s correlation coefficients are typically used. This paper explores modern nonparametric independence tests as an alternative, which, unlike traditional tests, have the ability to potentially detect any type of relationship. In addition to existing modern nonparametric independence tests, we developed and considered two novel variants of existing tests, most notably the Heller-Heller-Gorfine-Pearson (HHG-Pearson) test. We conducted a simulation study to compare traditional independence tests, such as Pearson’s correlation, and the modern nonparametric independence tests in situations commonly encountered in psychological research. As expected, no test had the highest power across all relationships. However, the distance correlation and the HHG-Pearson tests were found to have substantially greater power than all traditional tests for many relationships and only slightly less power in the worst case. A similar pattern was found in favor of the HHG-Pearson test compared to the distance correlation test. However, given that distance correlation performed better for linear relationships and is more widely accepted, we suggest considering its use in place or additional to traditional methods when there is no prior knowledge of the relationship type, as is often the case in psychological research.

Suggested Citation

  • Karch, Julian D. & Perez-Alonso, Andres F. & Bergsma, Wicher P., 2024. "Beyond Pearson’s correlation: modern nonparametric independence tests for psychological research," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 124587, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:124587
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/124587/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. X. Wang & B. Jiang & J. S. Liu, 2017. "Generalized R-squared for detecting dependence," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 104(1), pages 129-139.
    2. Sourav Chatterjee, 2021. "A New Coefficient of Correlation," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 116(536), pages 2009-2022, October.
    3. Fang Han & Shizhe Chen & Han Liu, 2017. "Distribution-free tests of independence in high dimensions," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 104(4), pages 813-828.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Borgonovo, Emanuele & Plischke, Elmar & Rabitti, Giovanni, 2024. "The many Shapley values for explainable artificial intelligence: A sensitivity analysis perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(3), pages 911-926.
    2. Yihui He & Fang Han, 2023. "On propensity score matching with a diverging number of matches," Papers 2310.14142, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    3. Fang Han, 2024. "An Introduction to Permutation Processes (version 0.5)," Papers 2407.09664, arXiv.org.
    4. Ivair R. Silva & Yan Zhuang & Julio C. A. da Silva Junior, 2022. "Kronecker delta method for testing independence between two vectors in high-dimension," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 63(2), pages 343-365, April.
    5. Almanza Junco, Carlos Alberto & Parra Acosta, Yenny Katherine & Sabogal Salamanca, Mauricio, 2024. "Model of innovation in agriculture 4.0 processes in the department of Cundinamarca, Colombia," Revista Tendencias, Universidad de Narino, vol. 25(2), pages 86-112, July.
    6. Zhexiao Lin & Fang Han, 2023. "On the failure of the bootstrap for Chatterjee's rank correlation," Papers 2303.14088, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2023.
    7. Abdol Rassoul Zarei & Marzieh Mokarram & Mohammad Reza Mahmoudi, 2023. "Comparison of the capability of the Meteorological and Remote Sensing Drought Indices," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(2), pages 769-796, January.
    8. Ziming Lin & Fang Han, 2024. "On the consistency of bootstrap for matching estimators," Papers 2410.23525, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2024.
    9. Hongjian Shi & Marc Hallin & Mathias Drton & Fang Han, 2020. "Rate-Optimality of Consistent Distribution-Free Tests of Independence Based on Center-Outward Ranks and Signs," Working Papers ECARES 2020-23, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    10. Borgonovo, Emanuele & Clemente, Gian Paolo & Rabitti, Giovanni, 2024. "Why insurance regulators need to require sensitivity settings of internal models for their approval," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    11. Dörnemann, Nina, 2023. "Likelihood ratio tests under model misspecification in high dimensions," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    12. Wu, Zeyu & Wang, Cheng, 2022. "Limiting spectral distribution of large dimensional Spearman’s rank correlation matrices," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    13. Borgonovo, Emanuele & Ghidini, Valentina & Hahn, Roman & Plischke, Elmar, 2023. "Explaining classifiers with measures of statistical association," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    14. Zhang, Qingyang, 2023. "On the asymptotic null distribution of the symmetrized Chatterjee’s correlation coefficient," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    15. Ćmiel, Bogdan & Ledwina, Teresa, 2020. "Validation of association," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 55-67.
    16. Tobias Fissler & Marc-Oliver Pohle, 2023. "Generalised Covariances and Correlations," Papers 2307.03594, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2023.
    17. Juan C. King & Roberto Dale & Jos'e M. Amig'o, 2024. "Blockchain Metrics and Indicators in Cryptocurrency Trading," Papers 2403.00770, arXiv.org.
    18. King, Juan C. & Dale, Roberto & Amigó, José M., 2024. "Blockchain metrics and indicators in cryptocurrency trading," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    19. Zhaoyang Li & Yuehan Yang, 2024. "A semi-orthogonal nonnegative matrix tri-factorization algorithm for overlapping community detection," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 65(6), pages 3601-3619, August.
    20. Wang, Hongfei & Liu, Binghui & Feng, Long & Ma, Yanyuan, 2024. "Rank-based max-sum tests for mutual independence of high-dimensional random vectors," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 238(1).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    correlation; hypothesis test; independence; nonparametric; relationship;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C1 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:124587. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.