IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/col/000520/021176.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Model of innovation in agriculture 4.0 processes in the department of Cundinamarca, Colombia

Author

Listed:
  • Almanza Junco, Carlos Alberto

    (Universidad Militar Nueva Granada)

  • Parra Acosta, Yenny Katherine

    (Universidad Militar Nueva Granada)

  • Sabogal Salamanca, Mauricio

    (Universidad Militar Nueva Granada)

Abstract

Innovation in agriculture plays a fundamental role in the transition of said production towards more sustainable schemes, hence the importance of its study, especially in relation to production processes. The literature shows that although several studies have been carried out that examine the variables that intervene in the innovation processes in the agricultural sector, there is a lack of studies that examine the innovation processes in Colombia. This is why the fundamental objective of this research is to develop a model that explains the main factors that are related to process innovation in the agricultural sector, using concepts derived from organizational innovation process models developed in the literature. The factors identification methodology used a sample of 1,190 Agricultural Production Units (UPA) collected in the National Agricultural Survey, incorporating only producers from the department of Cundinamarca, Colombia. With this sample, and using for the analysis the variables that are developed in the literature, a principal components factorial analysis was carried out, as well as a second-order confirmatory factorial analysis. The factor analysis shows three latent factors, among them “Innovation in Raw Materials”, “Innovation in crops” and “Innovation in management of External Factors”, which, being the most significant for the process innovation process, should be considered as fundamental part of the government's public policies to facilitate its adoption in Colombian agriculture in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Almanza Junco, Carlos Alberto & Parra Acosta, Yenny Katherine & Sabogal Salamanca, Mauricio, 2024. "Model of innovation in agriculture 4.0 processes in the department of Cundinamarca, Colombia," Revista Tendencias, Universidad de Narino, vol. 25(2), pages 86-112, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:col:000520:021176
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistas.udenar.edu.co/index.php/rtend/article/view/8816
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Voss, C. A., 1988. "Implementation: A key issue in manufacturing technology: The need for a field of study," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 55-63, April.
    2. Thomas B. Long & Vincent Blok, 2021. "Niche level investment challenges for European Green Deal financing in Europe: lessons from and for the agri-food climate transition," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, December.
    3. Sourav Chatterjee, 2021. "A New Coefficient of Correlation," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 116(536), pages 2009-2022, October.
    4. William Orjuela-Garzon & Santiago Quintero & Diana P. Giraldo & Laura Lotero & César Nieto-Londoño, 2021. "A Theoretical Framework for Analysing Technology Transfer Processes Using Agent-Based Modelling: A Case Study on Massive Technology Adoption (AMTEC) Program on Rice Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-23, October.
    5. Barbara Pancino & Emanuele Blasi & Anne Rappoldt & Stefano Pascucci & Luca Ruini & Cesare Ronchi, 2019. "Partnering for sustainability in agri-food supply chains: the case of Barilla Sustainable Farming in the Po Valley," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 7(1), pages 1-10, December.
    6. Anthony Heyes & Sandeep Kapur & Peter W. Kennedy & Steve Martin & John W. Maxwell, 2020. "But What Does It Mean? Competition between Products Carrying Alternative Green Labels When Consumers Are Active Acquirers of Information," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 7(2), pages 243-277.
    7. Naser Valizadeh & Latif Haji & Masoud Bijani & Negin Fallah Haghighi & Mahsa Fatemi & Ants-Hannes Viira & Yenny Katherine Parra-Acosta & Alishir Kurban & Hossein Azadi, 2021. "Development of a Scale to Remove Farmers’ Sustainability Barriers to Meteorological Information in Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-18, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Behroozeh, Samira & Hayati, Dariush & Karami, Ezatollah, 2022. "Determining and validating criteria to measure energy consumption sustainability in agricultural greenhouses," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    2. Marcello Stanco & Concetta Nazzaro & Marco Lerro & Giuseppe Marotta, 2020. "Sustainable Collective Innovation in the Agri-Food Value Chain: The Case of the “Aureo” Wheat Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-14, July.
    3. Hervas-Oliver, Jose-Luis & Sempere-Ripoll, Francisca & Boronat-Moll, Carles, 2012. "Process innovation objectives and management complementarities: patterns, drivers, co-adoption and performance effects," MERIT Working Papers 2012-051, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    4. Lilian Adriana Borges & Kim Hua Tan, 2017. "Incorporating human factors into the AAMT selection: a framework and process," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(5), pages 1459-1470, March.
    5. Hervas-Oliver, Jose-Luis & Sempere-Ripoll, Francisca, 2015. "Disentangling the influence of technological process and product innovations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 109-118.
    6. Bethany Cooper & Lin Crase & Michael Burton & Dan Rigby & Mohammad Jahangir Alam & Avinash Kishore, 2023. "Policy preferences of experts seeking to raise and stabilise farm incomes in the Eastern Gangetic Plains," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 67(3), pages 323-345, July.
    7. Cole, Matthew T. & Doremus, Jacqueline M. & Hamilton, Stephen F., 2021. "Import restrictions by eco-certification: Quantity effects on tropical timber production," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    8. Jin Han & Liang Yang, 2024. "Sentence Embedding Generation Framework Based on Kullback–Leibler Divergence Optimization and RoBERTa Knowledge Distillation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-20, December.
    9. Ziming Lin & Fang Han, 2024. "On the consistency of bootstrap for matching estimators," Papers 2410.23525, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2024.
    10. Fagerberg, Jan & Srholec, Martin & Verspagen, Bart, 2010. "Innovation and Economic Development," Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, in: Bronwyn H. Hall & Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 833-872, Elsevier.
    11. Edsand, Hans, 2016. "Technological Innovation Systems and the wider context: A framework for developing countries," MERIT Working Papers 2016-017, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    12. Lamiaa Chab & Luigi Biagini & Simone Severini, 2024. "Towards an Effective Risk Management in Durum Wheat Production: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis of Factors Influencing Quality and Yield," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-20, December.
    13. Zhang, Qingyang, 2023. "On the asymptotic null distribution of the symmetrized Chatterjee’s correlation coefficient," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    14. Keisuke Hattori & Keisaku Higashida, 2023. "Who should be regulated: Genuine producers or third parties?," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 138(3), pages 249-286, April.
    15. Xi Yang & Maozeng Xu & Wanleng Zhang, 2020. "Can Design for the Environment be Worthwhile? Green Design for Manufacturers Brands When Confronted with Competition from Store Brands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, February.
    16. Tobias Fissler & Marc-Oliver Pohle, 2023. "Generalised Covariances and Correlations," Papers 2307.03594, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2023.
    17. Juan C. King & Roberto Dale & Jos'e M. Amig'o, 2024. "Blockchain Metrics and Indicators in Cryptocurrency Trading," Papers 2403.00770, arXiv.org.
    18. Ioana Andreea Bogoslov & Anca Elena Lungu & Eduard Alexandru Stoica & Mircea Radu Georgescu, 2022. "European Green Deal Impact on Entrepreneurship and Competition: A Free Market Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, September.
    19. Olesya P. Kazachenok & Galina V. Stankevich & Natalia N. Chubaeva & Yuliya G. Tyurina, 2023. "Economic and legal approaches to the humanization of FinTech in the economy of artificial intelligence through the integration of blockchain into ESG Finance," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.
    20. Edsand, Hans-Erik, 2019. "Technological innovation system and the wider context: A framework for developing countries," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    agricultural research; agricultural development; factor analysis; scientific innovation; agricultural production.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products
    • O30 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - General
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • Q16 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - R&D; Agricultural Technology; Biofuels; Agricultural Extension Services
    • Q55 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Technological Innovation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000520:021176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Universidad de Narino (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fenarco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.