IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/col/000099/003687.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Un modelo RSDAIDS para las importaciones de madera de Estados Unidos y sus implicaciones para Colombia

Author

Listed:
  • Mauricio Alviar Ramirez
  • Medardo Restrepo Patiño
  • Santiago Gallón Gómez

Abstract

Resumen: Este trabajo presenta los resultados más importantes de un modelo de demanda de importaciones de productos maderables y sus implicaciónes para Colombia considerando el período 1980 1999. El modelo teórico usado es el desarrollado por Deaton y Muellbauer en 1980, denominado An Almost Ideal Demand System (AIDS). Este modelo permite estimar funciones de demanda de importaciones y, al mismo tiempo, permite el cálculo de las elasticidades precio e ingreso de los diferentes tipos de producto que participan en un determinado mercado. La metodología de estimación está definida por el modelo denominado Seemingly Unrelated Regresión (SUR). El estudio muestra, de un lado, que Colombia, a pesar de tener un potencial forestal muy considerable aún está lejos de aparecer en las estadísticas internacionales como país exportador de maderas. De otro lado, si Colombia decidiera desarrollar el sector forestal, se enfrentaría a una competencia muy fuerte representada fundamentalmente por Canadá, y algunos países asiáticos. Las elasticidades muestran cómo, en el caso de la madera en tronco, la mayoría de los productos (madera en tronco por países) se comportan como bienes complementarios. Los signos de las elasticidades son los esperados, lo que permite concluir que el modelo se ajusta bastante bien a los datos. / Abstract: This paper presents the main results of a model of import demand of wood products in the U.S. and its implications for Colombia. The time length considered here was 1980-1999. The theoretical model used was developed by Deaton and Muellbauer in 1980 and it is called: An Almost Ideal Demand System. This model allows the estimation of price and income elasticities for different types of wood products. The methodology used consists of the Seemingly Unrelated Regression model (SUR), popular in the econometrics literature. This paper shows, on one hand, that despite of the tremendous forest potential that Colombia has, its participation in international markets is negligible. On the other hand, if Colombia decided to develop the forest sector, it would have to face some strong competitors such as Canada and some Asian countries. The cross-price elasticities show that in the case of round wood the majority of countries behaves like complementary goods. The sign of the elasticities are the expected which allows to conclude that the model well fits the data.

Suggested Citation

  • Mauricio Alviar Ramirez & Medardo Restrepo Patiño & Santiago Gallón Gómez, 2002. "Un modelo RSDAIDS para las importaciones de madera de Estados Unidos y sus implicaciones para Colombia," Borradores del CIE 3687, Universidad de Antioquia, CIE.
  • Handle: RePEc:col:000099:003687
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/3626/1/BorradCIE_3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Henneberry, Shida Rastegari & Piewthongngam, Kullapapruk & Qiang, Han, 1999. "Consumer Food Safety Concerns And Fresh Produce Consumption," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 24(1), pages 1-16, July.
    2. Capps, Oral, Jr. & Tsai, Reyfong & Kirby, Raymond & Williams, Gary W., 1994. "A Comparison Of Demands For Meat Products In The Pacific Rim Region," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 19(1), pages 1-15, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rojas Rivera, Angela Milena, 2011. "Political Competition in Dual Economies: Clientelism in Latin America," Borradores Departamento de Economía 8103, Universidad de Antioquia, CIE.
    2. Tobón Orozco, David & Molina, Carlos & Vargas, Harvey, 2018. "Can environmental taxes and payments for ecosystem services regulate pollution when the resilience of water bodies is surpassed?," Borradores Departamento de Economía 17179, Universidad de Antioquia, CIE.
    3. Catalina Granda Carvajal, 2015. "Informality and macroeconomic volatility: do credit constraints matter?," Journal of Economic Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 42(6), pages 1095-1111, November.
    4. Rojas Rivera, Angela Milena & Molina Guerra, Carlos A., 2015. "A Comparative Analysis of Political Competition and Local Provision of Public Goods: Brazil, Colombia and Mexico(1991-2010)," MPRA Paper 67383, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 19 Oct 2015.
    5. García Callejas, Danny, 2011. "Per Capita GDP Convergence in South America, 1960-2007," Borradores Departamento de Economía 8983, Universidad de Antioquia, CIE.
    6. Juan Esteban Carranza & Alejandra González & Natalia Serna, 2014. "La relación entre la producción y el comercio exterior de la industria manufacturera colombiana (2000-2010)," Borradores de Economia 806, Banco de la Republica de Colombia.
    7. Kristian Ove R. Myrseth & Gerhard Riener & Conny Wollbrant, 2013. "Tangible temptation in the social dilemma: Cash, cooperation, and self-control," ESMT Research Working Papers ESMT-13-04, ESMT European School of Management and Technology.
    8. Garcia Callejas, Danny, 2010. "Corruption, Economic Freedom and Political Freedom in South America: In Pursuit of the missing Link," Borradores Departamento de Economía 7336, Universidad de Antioquia, CIE.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Suwartini, Endang & Coffin, H. Garth & Gunjal, Kisan, 1997. "Economic welfare analysis of policy-induced structural change in the Indonesian poultry industry," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 16(3), pages 237-243, August.
    2. Li, Chenguang & Sexton, Richard J., 2009. "Impacts of Retailers’ Pricing Strategies for Produce Commodities on Farmer Welfare," 2009 Conference, August 16-22, 2009, Beijing, China 51720, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Yeboah, Godfred & Maynard, Leigh J., 2004. "The Impact Of Bse, Fmd, And U.S. Export Promotion Expenditures On Japanese Meat Demand," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 19978, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    4. Huang, Ju-Chin & Haab, Timothy C. & Whitehead, John C., 2004. "Risk Valuation in the Presence of Risky Substitutes: An Application to Demand for Seafood," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 36(1), pages 1-16, April.
    5. Rowland, Christopher S. & Mjelde, James W. & Dharmasena, Senarath, 2017. "Policy implications of considering pre-commitments in U.S. aggregate energy demand system," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 406-413.
    6. Dragan Miljkovic & Gary Brester & John Marsh, 2003. "Exchange rate pass-through, price discrimination, and US meat export prices," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(6), pages 641-650.
    7. Lopez, Jose & Davis, Charade, 2015. "A Demand Analysis for Fresh Tomatoes in the Dallas/Fort Worth Grocery Market," 2015 Annual Meeting, January 31-February 3, 2015, Atlanta, Georgia 196847, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    8. Run Yu & Ping Leung, 2012. "The economic implication of rising transport cost for a small open economy: a case study of Hawaii’s vegetable sector," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 48(3), pages 855-875, June.
    9. Zhihao Zheng & Shida Rastegari Henneberry, 2009. "An Analysis of Food Demand in China: A Case Study of Urban Households in Jiangsu Province," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 31(4), pages 873-893.
    10. Chaowana Phetcharat & Warattaya Chinnakum, 2022. "Differences in Household Food Demand by Income Category As Evidenced in Rural Thailand," PIER Discussion Papers 181, Puey Ungphakorn Institute for Economic Research.
    11. Shida Rastegari Henneberry & Joao E. Mutondo, 2009. "Agricultural Trade among NAFTA Countries: A Case Study of U.S. Meat Exports," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 31(3), pages 424-445.
    12. Hejazi, Mina & Zhu, Jue & Marchant, Mary, 2017. "The Impact of Diversifying China’s Global Agri-Food Suppliers on U.S. Exports: A Case Study of China’s Meat Import Demand," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 259197, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    13. Huang, Jikun & Bouis, Howarth E., 1996. "Structural changes in the demand for food in Asia," 2020 vision briefs 41, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    14. Minseong Kang & Byeong‐Il Ahn, 2023. "Market power and cost‐efficiency effects: Broiler packing industry in South Korea," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(4), pages 1157-1172, October.
    15. Wen S. Chern & Kimiko Ishibashi & Kiyoshi Taniguchi & Yuki Tokoyama, 2002. "Analysis of Food Consumption Behavior by Japanese Households," Working Papers 02-06, Agricultural and Development Economics Division of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO - ESA).
    16. Acharya, Ram N. & Molina, Ignacio, 2004. "Testing For A Change In Consumer Tastes For Fresh Fruits And Vegetables: A Structural Latent Variable Approach," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 20127, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    17. Cheng, Guo & Dharmasena, Senarath & Capps, Oral, Jr., 2017. "The Taste for Variety: Demand Analysis for Nut Products in the United States," Reports 285248, Texas A&M University, Agribusiness, Food, and Consumer Economics Research Center.
    18. Chen, Xuqi & Gao, Zhifeng & Swisher, Marilyn & House, Lisa & Zhao, Xin, 2018. "Eco-labeling in the Fresh Produce Market: Not All Environmentally Friendly Labels Are Equally Valued," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 201-210.
    19. Gvillo, Rejeana & Dharmasena, Senarath & Capps, Oral, Jr., 2014. "Dynamics of Advertising and Demand for Milk in the United States Delineated by Milk Fat Type," 2014 Annual Meeting, February 1-4, 2014, Dallas, Texas 162265, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    20. Jeon, Younghyeon & Hoang, Hoa K. & Thompson, Wyatt & Abler, David & Miller, J. Isaac, 2022. "Revealing the fundamental parameters of a food demand system using estimated elasticities," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322182, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    demanda de importaciones; productos maderables; coníferas; modelo RSAIDS; modelo SUR; elasticidades;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q23 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Forestry
    • Q17 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agriculture in International Trade
    • C30 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - General
    • D11 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Theory

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000099:003687. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Universidad de Antioquia. Facultad de Ciencias Economicas. (Laura Maria Posada Arboleda) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ciantco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.