IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsrrp/qt4qm8w54d.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Definition and Evaluation of Bus and Truck Automation Operations Concepts

Author

Listed:
  • Tsao, H.-S. Jacob
  • Botha, Jan L.

Abstract

Traffic congestion will continue to worsen and likely worsen at a faster rate than ever. People throughput and freight throughput have become critical issues for California and the rest of the nation. PATH has been funding a one-year research project entitled "Definition and Evaluation of Bus and Truck Automation Operations Concepts," proposed by the authors. This report summarizes the results of the research project achieved during the first six months. During those six months, we reviewed literature and developed operating concepts for both urban bus automation and inter-city truck automation. We also selected a small number of most promising operating concepts for urban bus automation and inter-city truck automation, both with variations and intermediate deployment steps. On urban bus automation, we selected one unprotected automated busway system (ABUS) for city operations and two operating concepts for automated bus operations on or along a freeway. All or a subset of these three concepts can be integrated to form other operating concepts. On truck automation, we selected an operating concept for a protected inter-city truck-AHS. These concepts describe how automated systems involving buses or trucks operate as a system and how they interact with the surrounding transportation systems. These systems, if implemented, will revolutionize the current bus or truck transportation systems. They certainly cannot be achieved suddenly, and hence can be regarded as end-state systems. Since these end-state operating concepts re intended for real-world implementation and such implementation requires the participation of many stakeholders, any creditable end-state operating concept must be accompanied by and even justified with credible deployment sequences. We developed deployment sequences for these operating concepts to demonstrate the deployability of these concepts and to explain how to "get there from here."

Suggested Citation

  • Tsao, H.-S. Jacob & Botha, Jan L., 2002. "Definition and Evaluation of Bus and Truck Automation Operations Concepts," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt4qm8w54d, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt4qm8w54d
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/4qm8w54d.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tsao, Jacob, 1995. "Traffic Control For Automated Highway Systems: A Conceptual Framework," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt98q0r14p, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    2. Kawamura, Kazuya, 1999. "Commercial Vehicle Value of Time and Perceived Benefit of Congestion Pricing," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt4pz727p6, University of California Transportation Center.
    3. H.-S. Jacob Tsao & Randolph W. Hall & Indrajit Chatterjee, 1997. "Analytical Models for Vehicle/Gap Distribution on Automated Highway Systems," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 18-33, February.
    4. Tsao, H.-S. Jacob, 1998. "The Role of Air Cargo in California's Goods Movement," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt2cq9w149, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    5. Randolph W. Hall & Ali Nowroozi & Jacob Tsao, 2001. "Entrance Capacity of an Automated Highway System," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 19-36, February.
    6. Hall, Randolph W. & Thakker, Viral & Horan, Thomas A. & Glazer, Jesse & Hoene, Chris, 1997. "Automated Highway System Field Operational Tests For The State Of California: Potential Sites, Configurations And Characteristics," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt57h8h3tz, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    7. Al-Ayat, Rokaya & Hall, Randolph, 1994. "A Conceptual Approach for Developing and Analyzing Alternate Evolutionary Deployment Strategies for Intelligent Vehicle/Highway Systems," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt2c1048tj, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Taso, H. S. Jacob & Botha, Jan L., 2003. "Definition and Evaluation of Bus and Truck Automation Operations Concepts: Final Report," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt9pz7n1gr, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    2. Tsao, H. S. Jacob & Zhang, Lan & Lin, Lin & Batni, Deepa, 2004. "Evaluation of Bus and Truck Automation Operations Concepts," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt2f41h8fv, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    3. Hall, Randolph & Chin, Chinan, 2002. "Vehicle Sorting for Platoon Formation: Impacts on Highway Entry and Throughput," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt58t3f9p8, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    4. Hall, Randolph & Chin, Chinan & Gadgil, Nishad, 2003. "The Automated Highway System / Street Interface: Final Report," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt0zm6v6m3, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    5. Luca Zamparini & Aura Reggiani, 2007. "Freight Transport and the Value of Travel Time Savings: A Meta‐analysis of Empirical Studies," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(5), pages 621-636, March.
    6. Tsao, H.-S. Jacob & Ran, Bin, 1996. "Driving Intelligence Replacement in a Decision-Oriented Deployment Framework for Driving Automation," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt7bn2j1mg, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    7. Tsao, H. S. Jacob, 1996. "Constraints On Initial Ahs Deployment And The Concept Definition Of A Shuttle Service For Ahs Debut," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt7rx3w3m2, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    8. Tsao, H. S. Jacob, 1996. "Stage Definition For Ahs Deployment And An Ahs Evolutionary Scenario," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt98d0t89t, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    9. Tsao, Jacob, 1995. "A Staggered-diamond Design For Automated/manual - Hov Highway-to-highway Interchange," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt30t158dv, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    10. Smalkoski, Brian & Levinson, David, 2005. "Value of Time for Commercial Vehicle Operators," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 44(1).
    11. Weissenberger, Stein, 1998. "Why Its Projects Should Be Small, Local And Private," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt634959x5, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    12. Hall, Randolph W. & Caliskan, Cenk, 1997. "Design And Evaluation Of An Automated Highway System With Optimized Lane Assignment," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt6c85n2p5, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    13. Smalkoski, Brian & Levinson, David, 2004. "Value Of Time For Commercial Vehicle Operators In Minnesota," 45th Annual Transportation Research Forum, Evanston, Illinois, March 21-23, 2004 208272, Transportation Research Forum.
    14. Hernández, Salvador & Peeta, Srinivas & Kalafatas, George, 2011. "A less-than-truckload carrier collaboration planning problem under dynamic capacities," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 933-946.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt4qm8w54d. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.