IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2409.20033.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Fuel tax loss in a world of electric mobility: A window of opportunity for congestion pricing

Author

Listed:
  • Thi Ngoc Nguyen
  • Felix Muesgens

Abstract

The continued transition towards electric mobility will decrease energy tax revenues worldwide, which has substantial implications for government funds. At the same time, demand for transportation is ever increasing, which in turn increases congestion problems. Combining both challenges, this paper assesses the effectiveness of congestion pricing as a sustainable revenue stream to offset fuel tax loss in 2030 while simultaneously enhancing efficiency in the transport sector. A congestion-based toll that is road-and-time-variant is simulated for the greater Berlin area in Germany using the multi-agent transport simulation (MATSim) software. Through the simulation results, this paper quantifies the impacts of the toll on the governmental revenue, traffic management, environment, social welfare, and the distribution effects. We find that the revenue from congestion tolls in a metropolitan area can compensate the reduction in passenger car fuel tax. Furthermore, a remarkable welfare surplus is observed. The toll also successfully incentivises transport users to adjust their travel behaviour, which reduces traffic delay time by 28%. CO2 emissions as a key metric for decarbonisation of the transport sector decrease by more than 5%. The analysis of the distribution effects suggests that a redistribution plan with a focus on the middle-low-income residents and the outer boroughs could help the policy gain more public acceptance.

Suggested Citation

  • Thi Ngoc Nguyen & Felix Muesgens, 2024. "Fuel tax loss in a world of electric mobility: A window of opportunity for congestion pricing," Papers 2409.20033, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2409.20033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2409.20033
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Siobhan Powell & Gustavo Vianna Cezar & Liang Min & Inês M. L. Azevedo & Ram Rajagopal, 2022. "Charging infrastructure access and operation to reduce the grid impacts of deep electric vehicle adoption," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 7(10), pages 932-945, October.
    2. Liu, Zhiyuan & Wang, Shuaian & Meng, Qiang, 2014. "Optimal joint distance and time toll for cordon-based congestion pricing," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 81-97.
    3. Mine Isik & Rebecca Dodder & P. Ozge Kaplan, 2021. "Transportation emissions scenarios for New York City under different carbon intensities of electricity and electric vehicle adoption rates," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 6(1), pages 92-104, January.
    4. Small, Kenneth A., 1983. "The incidence of congestion tolls on urban highways," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 90-111, January.
    5. Wangsness, Paal Brevik, 2018. "How to road price in a world with electric vehicles and government budget constraints," Working Paper Series 10-2017, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, School of Economics and Business.
    6. David Levinson & Peter Rafferty, 2004. "Delayer Pays Principle: Examining Congestion Pricing with Compensation," Working Papers 200407, University of Minnesota: Nexus Research Group.
    7. Amit Agarwal & Benjamin Kickhöfer, 2018. "The correlation of externalities in marginal cost pricing: lessons learned from a real-world case study," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 849-873, May.
    8. Ihab Kaddoura, 2015. "Marginal Congestion Cost Pricing in a Multi-agent Simulation Investigation of the Greater Berlin Area," Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, University of Bath, vol. 49(4), pages 560-578, October.
    9. He, Brian Yueshuai & Zhou, Jinkai & Ma, Ziyi & Wang, Ding & Sha, Di & Lee, Mina & Chow, Joseph Y.J. & Ozbay, Kaan, 2021. "A validated multi-agent simulation test bed to evaluate congestion pricing policies on population segments by time-of-day in New York City," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 145-161.
    10. Georgina Santos & Laurent Rojey, 2004. "Distributional impacts of road pricing: The truth behind the myth," Transportation, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 21-42, February.
    11. Shafiei, Ehsan & Davidsdottir, Brynhildur & Fazeli, Reza & Leaver, Jonathan & Stefansson, Hlynur & Asgeirsson, Eyjolfur Ingi, 2018. "Macroeconomic effects of fiscal incentives to promote electric vehicles in Iceland: Implications for government and consumer costs," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 431-443.
    12. Cavallaro, Federico & Giaretta, Federico & Nocera, Silvio, 2018. "The potential of road pricing schemes to reduce carbon emissions," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 85-92.
    13. Peter Cramton & R. Richard Geddes & Axel Ockenfels, 2018. "Set road charges in real time to ease traffic," Nature, Nature, vol. 560(7716), pages 23-25, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eliasson, Jonas & Mattsson, Lars-Göran, 2006. "Equity effects of congestion pricing: Quantitative methodology and a case study for Stockholm," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 40(7), pages 602-620, August.
    2. Jens West & Maria Börjesson, 2020. "The Gothenburg congestion charges: cost–benefit analysis and distribution effects," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 145-174, February.
    3. Zong, Fang & Li, Yu-Xuan & Zeng, Meng, 2023. "Developing a carbon emission charging scheme considering mobility as a service," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    4. David A. Hensher & Edward Wei & Wen Liu & Loan Ho & Chinh Ho, 2023. "Development of a practical aggregate spatial road freight modal demand model system for truck and commodity movements with an application of a distance-based charging regime," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 1031-1071, June.
    5. Bofinger, Peter & Feld, Lars P. & Schmidt, Christoph M. & Schnabel, Isabel & Wieland, Volker, 2018. "Vor wichtigen wirtschaftspolitischen Weichenstellungen. Jahresgutachten 2018/19 [Setting the Right Course for Economic Policy. Annual Report 2018/19]," Annual Economic Reports / Jahresgutachten, German Council of Economic Experts / Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, volume 127, number 201819, February.
    6. Wu, Jiyan & Tian, Ye & Sun, Jian & Michael Zhang, H. & Wang, Yunpeng, 2023. "Public or private? Optimal organization for incentive-based travel demand management," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    7. Kaddoura, Ihab & Nagel, Kai, 2019. "Congestion pricing in a real-world oriented agent-based simulation context," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 40-51.
    8. Button, Kenneth, 2004. "1. The Rationale For Road Pricing: Standard Theory And Latest Advances," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 3-25, January.
    9. Georgina Santos & Erik Verhoef, 2011. "Road Congestion Pricing," Chapters, in: André de Palma & Robin Lindsey & Emile Quinet & Roger Vickerman (ed.), A Handbook of Transport Economics, chapter 23, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Tan, Yu & Sun, Zhanbo & Zhu, Baichuan & Qin, Ziye & Zhao, Yu & Wang, Xuting, 2024. "Minimize population exposure to vehicle-generated emissions by road pricing," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 15-30.
    11. Maruyama, Takuya & Sumalee, Agachai, 2007. "Efficiency and equity comparison of cordon- and area-based road pricing schemes using a trip-chain equilibrium model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 41(7), pages 655-671, August.
    12. Jiang, Qinhua & Zhang, Ning & Yueshuai He, Brian & Lee, Changju & Ma, Jiaqi, 2024. "Large-scale public charging demand prediction with a scenario- and activity-based approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    13. Albrecht, Maxwell & Brown, Anne & Lederman, Jaimee & Taylor, Brian D. & Wachs, Martin, 2017. "The Equity Challenges and Outcomes of California County Transportation Sales Tax," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt39q2758w, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    14. Kristoffersson, Ida & Engelson, Leonid & Börjesson, Maria, 2017. "Efficiency vs equity: Conflicting objectives of congestion charges," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 99-107.
    15. Peiyu Jing & Ravi Seshadri & Takanori Sakai & Ali Shamshiripour & Andre Romano Alho & Antonios Lentzakis & Moshe E. Ben-Akiva, 2023. "Evaluating congestion pricing schemes using agent-based passenger and freight microsimulation," Papers 2305.07318, arXiv.org.
    16. Pablo González-Aliste & Iván Derpich & Mario López, 2023. "Reducing Urban Traffic Congestion via Charging Price," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    17. Qixiu Cheng & Zhiyuan Liu & Feifei Liu & Ruo Jia, 2017. "Urban dynamic congestion pricing: an overview and emerging research needs," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(0), pages 3-18, August.
    18. Chen, Yufeng & Ni, Liangfu & Liu, Kelong, 2021. "Does China's new energy vehicle industry innovate efficiently? A three-stage dynamic network slacks-based measure approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    19. Janusch, Nicholas, 2016. "A note on the distortionary effects of revenue-neutral tolls in a bottleneck congestion game," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 95-103.
    20. Chen, Hongyu & Nie, Yu (Marco) & Yin, Yafeng, 2015. "Optimal multi-step toll design under general user heterogeneity," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 81(P3), pages 775-793.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2409.20033. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.