IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2112.06290.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A q-spin Potts model of markets: Gain-loss asymmetry in stock indices as an emergent phenomenon

Author

Listed:
  • Stefan Bornholdt

    (Bremen University)

Abstract

Spin models of markets inspired by physics models of magnetism, as the Ising model, allow for the study of the collective dynamics of interacting agents in a market. The number of possible states has been mostly limited to two (buy or sell) or three options. However, herding effects of competing stocks and the collective dynamics of a whole market may escape our reach in the simplest models. Here I study a q-spin Potts model version of a simple Ising market model to represent the dynamics of a stock market index in a spin model. As a result, a self-organized gain-loss asymmetry in the time series of an index variable composed of stocks in this market is observed.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefan Bornholdt, 2021. "A q-spin Potts model of markets: Gain-loss asymmetry in stock indices as an emergent phenomenon," Papers 2112.06290, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2112.06290
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2112.06290
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vilela, André L.M. & Wang, Chao & Nelson, Kenric P. & Stanley, H. Eugene, 2019. "Majority-vote model for financial markets," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 515(C), pages 762-770.
    2. Takuya Yamano, 2002. "Bornholdt'S Spin Model Of A Market Dynamics In High Dimensions," International Journal of Modern Physics C (IJMPC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 13(01), pages 89-96.
    3. Raul Donangelo & Mogens H. Jensen & Ingve Simonsen & Kim Sneppen, 2006. "Synchronization Model for Stock Market Asymmetry," Papers physics/0604137, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2006.
    4. Alan Kirman, 1993. "Ants, Rationality, and Recruitment," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 108(1), pages 137-156.
    5. Tetsuya Takaishi, 2005. "Simulations Of Financial Markets In A Potts-Like Model," International Journal of Modern Physics C (IJMPC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(08), pages 1311-1317.
    6. Tetsuya Takaishi, 2016. "Dynamical cross-correlation of multiple time series Ising model," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 455-468, December.
    7. Horváth, Denis & Kuscsik, Zoltán & Gmitra, Martin, 2006. "The co-evolutionary dynamics of directed network of spin market agents," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 369(2), pages 780-788.
    8. Kaizoji, Taisei & Bornholdt, Stefan & Fujiwara, Yoshi, 2002. "Dynamics of price and trading volume in a spin model of stock markets with heterogeneous agents," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 316(1), pages 441-452.
    9. Meudt, Frederik & Schmitt, Thilo A. & Schäfer, Rudi & Guhr, Thomas, 2016. "Equilibrium pricing in an order book environment: Case study for a spin model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 453(C), pages 228-235.
    10. Horváth, Denis & Gmitra, Martin & Kuscsik, Zoltán, 2006. "A self-adjusted Monte Carlo simulation as a model for financial markets with central regulation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 361(2), pages 589-605.
    11. Kukacka, Jiri & Kristoufek, Ladislav, 2021. "Does parameterization affect the complexity of agent-based models?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 324-356.
    12. Kukacka, Jiri & Kristoufek, Ladislav, 2020. "Do ‘complex’ financial models really lead to complex dynamics? Agent-based models and multifractality," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    13. Didier SORNETTE, 2014. "Physics and Financial Economics (1776-2014): Puzzles, Ising and Agent-Based Models," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 14-25, Swiss Finance Institute.
    14. Sebastian M. Krause & Stefan Bornholdt, 2012. "Opinion formation model for markets with a social temperature and fear," Papers 1212.4751, arXiv.org.
    15. Magdalena A. Zaluska-Kotur & Krzysztof Karpio & Arkadiusz Orlowski, 2006. "Comparison of gain-loss asymmetry behavior for stocks and indexes," Papers physics/0608214, arXiv.org.
    16. Thomas Lux & Michele Marchesi, 1999. "Scaling and criticality in a stochastic multi-agent model of a financial market," Nature, Nature, vol. 397(6719), pages 498-500, February.
    17. D. Sornette, 2014. "Physics and Financial Economics (1776-2014): Puzzles, Ising and Agent-Based models," Papers 1404.0243, arXiv.org.
    18. Krause, Sebastian M. & Bornholdt, Stefan, 2013. "Spin models as microfoundation of macroscopic market models," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(18), pages 4048-4054.
    19. Cecilie Toftdahl Olesen & Kim Sneppen, 2020. "Modelling value bubbles in an attention based economy," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 93(3), pages 1-5, March.
    20. Tetsuya Takaishi, 2005. "Simulations of financial markets in a Potts-like model," Papers cond-mat/0503156, arXiv.org.
    21. Stefan Bornholdt, 2001. "Expectation Bubbles In A Spin Model Of Markets: Intermittency From Frustration Across Scales," International Journal of Modern Physics C (IJMPC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 12(05), pages 667-674.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bornholdt, Stefan, 2022. "A q-spin Potts model of markets: Gain–loss asymmetry in stock indices as an emergent phenomenon," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 588(C).
    2. Tetsuya Takaishi, 2016. "Dynamical cross-correlation of multiple time series Ising model," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 455-468, December.
    3. Kristoufek, Ladislav & Vošvrda, Miloslav S., 2016. "Herding, minority game, market clearing and efficient markets in a simple spin model framework," FinMaP-Working Papers 68, Collaborative EU Project FinMaP - Financial Distortions and Macroeconomic Performance: Expectations, Constraints and Interaction of Agents.
    4. Quanbo Zha & Gang Kou & Hengjie Zhang & Haiming Liang & Xia Chen & Cong-Cong Li & Yucheng Dong, 2020. "Opinion dynamics in finance and business: a literature review and research opportunities," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 1-22, December.
    5. Krause, Sebastian M. & Bornholdt, Stefan, 2013. "Spin models as microfoundation of macroscopic market models," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(18), pages 4048-4054.
    6. Katahira, Kei & Chen, Yu & Hashimoto, Gaku & Okuda, Hiroshi, 2019. "Development of an agent-based speculation game for higher reproducibility of financial stylized facts," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 524(C), pages 503-518.
    7. Tetsuya Takaishi, 2014. "Analysis of Spin Financial Market by GARCH Model," Papers 1409.0118, arXiv.org.
    8. Zubillaga, Bernardo J. & Vilela, André L.M. & Wang, Chao & Nelson, Kenric P. & Stanley, H. Eugene, 2022. "A three-state opinion formation model for financial markets," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 588(C).
    9. Jørgen Vitting Andersen & Ioannis Vrontos & Petros Dellaportas & Serge Galam, 2014. "Communication impacting financial markets," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00982959, HAL.
    10. Yuichi Ikeda, 2020. "An Interacting Agent Model of Economic Crisis," Papers 2001.11843, arXiv.org.
    11. Torsten Trimborn & Philipp Otte & Simon Cramer & Maximilian Beikirch & Emma Pabich & Martin Frank, 2020. "SABCEMM: A Simulator for Agent-Based Computational Economic Market Models," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 55(2), pages 707-744, February.
    12. Simon Cramer & Torsten Trimborn, 2019. "Stylized Facts and Agent-Based Modeling," Papers 1912.02684, arXiv.org.
    13. Didier SORNETTE, 2014. "Physics and Financial Economics (1776-2014): Puzzles, Ising and Agent-Based Models," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 14-25, Swiss Finance Institute.
    14. Torsten Trimborn & Philipp Otte & Simon Cramer & Max Beikirch & Emma Pabich & Martin Frank, 2018. "SABCEMM-A Simulator for Agent-Based Computational Economic Market Models," Papers 1801.01811, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2018.
    15. Kei Katahira & Yu Chen & Gaku Hashimoto & Hiroshi Okuda, 2019. "Development of an agent-based speculation game for higher reproducibility of financial stylized facts," Papers 1902.02040, arXiv.org.
    16. Tetsuya Takaishi, 2008. "Financial Time Series Analysis of SV Model by Hybrid Monte Carlo," Papers 0807.4394, arXiv.org.
    17. D. Sornette, 2014. "Physics and Financial Economics (1776-2014): Puzzles, Ising and Agent-Based models," Papers 1404.0243, arXiv.org.
    18. Gao-Feng Gu & Xiong Xiong & Hai-Chuan Xu & Wei Zhang & Yongjie Zhang & Wei Chen & Wei-Xing Zhou, 2021. "An empirical behavioral order-driven model with price limit rules," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 1-24, December.
    19. Kononovicius, Aleksejus & Ruseckas, Julius, 2019. "Order book model with herd behavior exhibiting long-range memory," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 525(C), pages 171-191.
    20. Lan, Yun & Fang, Wen, 2024. "Mechanisms of investors’ bounded rationality and market herding effect by the stochastic Ising financial model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 648(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2112.06290. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.