IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eurphb/v93y2020i3d10.1140_epjb_e2020-100449-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling value bubbles in an attention based economy

Author

Listed:
  • Cecilie Toftdahl Olesen

    (Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen University)

  • Kim Sneppen

    (Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen University)

Abstract

Exchange of products, ideas, and memes is ubiquitous across history and societies. Repeated transactions occasionally leads to “bubbles” where something becomes disproportionately valuable. Remarkably little has been done to explore this highly non-equilibrium aspect of economic activity. We suggest to view “bubble dynamics” in terms of a market of memory and attention. We introduce an agent based model where a positive feedback acting on recent memories is counteracted by a slower negative feedback. We discuss the model in the context of fashion cycles and financial bubbles. Graphical abstract

Suggested Citation

  • Cecilie Toftdahl Olesen & Kim Sneppen, 2020. "Modelling value bubbles in an attention based economy," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 93(3), pages 1-5, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:eurphb:v:93:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1140_epjb_e2020-100449-9
    DOI: 10.1140/epjb/e2020-100449-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1140/epjb/e2020-100449-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1140/epjb/e2020-100449-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stefan Bornholdt & Kim Sneppen, 2014. "Do Bitcoins make the world go round? On the dynamics of competing crypto-currencies," Papers 1403.6378, arXiv.org.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stefan Bornholdt, 2021. "A q-spin Potts model of markets: Gain-loss asymmetry in stock indices as an emergent phenomenon," Papers 2112.06290, arXiv.org.
    2. Bornholdt, Stefan, 2022. "A q-spin Potts model of markets: Gain–loss asymmetry in stock indices as an emergent phenomenon," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 588(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ke Wu & Spencer Wheatley & Didier Sornette, 2018. "Classification of cryptocurrency coins and tokens by the dynamics of their market capitalisations," Papers 1803.03088, arXiv.org, revised May 2018.
    2. Ladislav Kristoufek, 2015. "What Are the Main Drivers of the Bitcoin Price? Evidence from Wavelet Coherence Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, April.
    3. Kristoufek, Ladislav, 2018. "On Bitcoin markets (in)efficiency and its evolution," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 503(C), pages 257-262.
    4. Espinoza-Licona, David R. & Pérez-Sosa, Felipe A., 2019. "El bitcoin, ¿una burbuja especulativa? Análisis de la estabilidad paramétrica de series de tiempo para el periodo 2009-2018," eseconomía, Escuela Superior de Economía, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, vol. 14(51), pages 45-60, Segundo s.
    5. Beate Sauer, 2016. "Virtual Currencies, the Money Market, and Monetary Policy," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 22(2), pages 117-130, May.
    6. Jamal Bouoiyour & Refk Selmi & Aviral Kumar Tiwari, 2015. "Is Bitcoin Business Income Or Speculative Foolery? New Ideas Through An Improved Frequency Domain Analysis," Annals of Financial Economics (AFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 10(01), pages 1-23.
    7. Beate Sauer, 2015. "Central Bank Behaviour Concerning the Level of Bitcoin Regulation as a Policy Variable," Athens Journal of Business & Economics, Athens Institute for Education and Research (ATINER), vol. 1(4), pages 273-286, April.
    8. Bouoiyour, Jamal & Selmi, Refk & Tiwari, Aviral, 2014. "Is Bitcoin business income or speculative bubble? Unconditional vs. conditional frequency domain analysis," MPRA Paper 59595, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Luisanna Cocco & Michele Marchesi, 2016. "Modeling and Simulation of the Economics of Mining in the Bitcoin Market," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-31, October.
    10. Peter Fratrič & Giovanni Sileno & Sander Klous & Tom Engers, 2022. "Manipulation of the Bitcoin market: an agent-based study," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-29, December.
    11. Zargar, Faisal Nazir & Kumar, Dilip, 2019. "Long range dependence in the Bitcoin market: A study based on high-frequency data," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 515(C), pages 625-640.
    12. Jyotir Moy Chatterjee & Le Hoang Son & Srijani Ghatak & Raghvendra Kumar & Manju Khari, 2018. "BitCoin exclusively informational money: a valuable review from 2010 to 2017," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(5), pages 2037-2054, September.
    13. Luisanna Cocco & Giulio Concas & Michele Marchesi, 2017. "Using an artificial financial market for studying a cryptocurrency market," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 12(2), pages 345-365, July.
    14. Paulo Ferreira & Éder Pereira, 2019. "Contagion Effect in Cryptocurrency Market," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-8, July.
    15. Zargar, Faisal Nazir & Kumar, Dilip, 2019. "Informational inefficiency of Bitcoin: A study based on high-frequency data," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 344-353.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Statistical and Nonlinear Physics;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eurphb:v:93:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1140_epjb_e2020-100449-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.