IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1907.03082.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Systemic Risk and Heterogeneous Mean Field Type Interbank Network

Author

Listed:
  • Li-Hsien Sun

Abstract

We study the system of heterogeneous interbank lending and borrowing based on the relative average of log-capitalization given by the linear combination of the average within groups and the ensemble average and describe the evolution of log-capitalization by a system of coupled diffusions. The model incorporates a game feature with homogeneity within groups and heterogeneity between groups where banks search for the optimal lending or borrowing strategies through minimizing the heterogeneous linear quadratic costs in order to avoid to approach the default barrier. Due to the complicity of the lending and borrowing system, the closed-loop Nash equilibria and the open-loop Nash equilibria are both driven by the coupled Riccati equations. The existence of the equilibria in the two-group case where the number of banks are sufficiently large is guaranteed by the solvability for the coupled Riccati equations as the number of banks goes to infinity in each group. The equilibria are consisted of the mean-reverting term identical to the one group game and the group average owing to heterogeneity. In addition, the corresponding heterogeneous mean filed game with the arbitrary number of groups is also discussed. The existence of the $\epsilon$-Nash equilibrium in the general $d$ heterogeneous groups is also verified. Finally, in the financial implication, we observe the Nash equilibria governed by the mean-reverting term and the linear combination of the ensemble averages of individual groups and study the influence of the relative parameters on the liquidity rate through the numerical analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Li-Hsien Sun, 2019. "Systemic Risk and Heterogeneous Mean Field Type Interbank Network," Papers 1907.03082, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2019.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1907.03082
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1907.03082
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. Bensoussan & K. C. J. Sung & S. C. P. Yam & S. P. Yung, 2016. "Linear-Quadratic Mean Field Games," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 169(2), pages 496-529, May.
    2. Gilles-Edouard Espinosa & Nizar Touzi, 2015. "Optimal Investment Under Relative Performance Concerns," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(2), pages 221-257, April.
    3. René Carmona & Jean-Pierre Fouque & Seyyed Mostafa Mousavi & Li-Hsien Sun, 2018. "Systemic Risk and Stochastic Games with Delay," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 179(2), pages 366-399, November.
    4. Josselin Garnier & George Papanicolaou & Tzu-Wei Yang, 2015. "A risk analysis for a system stabilized by a central agent," Papers 1507.08333, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2015.
    5. Li-Hsien Sun, 2016. "Systemic Risk and Interbank Lending," Papers 1611.06672, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2017.
    6. Daniel Lacker & Thaleia Zariphopoulou, 2019. "Mean field and n‐agent games for optimal investment under relative performance criteria," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 1003-1038, October.
    7. Jean-Pierre Fouque & Zhaoyu Zhang, 2018. "Mean Field Game with Delay: A Toy Model," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-17, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Masaaki Fujii, 2020. "Probabilistic Approach to Mean Field Games and Mean Field Type Control Problems with Multiple Populations," CARF F-Series CARF-F-497, Center for Advanced Research in Finance, Faculty of Economics, The University of Tokyo.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li-Hsien Sun, 2022. "Mean Field Games with Heterogeneous Groups: Application to Banking Systems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 192(1), pages 130-167, January.
    2. Han, Jinhui & Ma, Guiyuan & Yam, Sheung Chi Phillip, 2022. "Relative performance evaluation for dynamic contracts in a large competitive market," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(2), pages 768-780.
    3. Hanchao Liu & Dena Firoozi, 2024. "Hilbert Space-Valued LQ Mean Field Games: An Infinite-Dimensional Analysis," Papers 2403.01012, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2024.
    4. Yu-Jui Huang & Li-Hsien Sun, 2023. "Partial Information in a Mean-Variance Portfolio Selection Game," Papers 2312.04045, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2024.
    5. Eduardo Abi Jaber & Eyal Neuman & Moritz Vo{ss}, 2023. "Equilibrium in Functional Stochastic Games with Mean-Field Interaction," Papers 2306.05433, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.
    6. Curatola, Giuliano, 2022. "Price impact, strategic interaction and portfolio choice," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    7. Guanxing Fu, 2023. "Mean field portfolio games with consumption," Mathematics and Financial Economics, Springer, volume 17, number 4, December.
    8. Chao Deng & Xizhi Su & Chao Zhou, 2024. "Peer effect and dynamic ALM games among insurers," Mathematics and Financial Economics, Springer, volume 18, number 11, December.
    9. Li-Hsien Sun, 2018. "Systemic Risk and Interbank Lending," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 179(2), pages 400-424, November.
    10. Guanxing Fu & Xizhi Su & Chao Zhou, 2020. "Mean Field Exponential Utility Game: A Probabilistic Approach," Papers 2006.07684, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2020.
    11. Nicole Bäuerle & Tamara Göll, 2023. "Nash equilibria for relative investors via no-arbitrage arguments," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 97(1), pages 1-23, February.
    12. Michail Anthropelos & Tianran Geng & Thaleia Zariphopoulou, 2020. "Competition in Fund Management and Forward Relative Performance Criteria," Papers 2011.00838, arXiv.org.
    13. Robert Balkin & Hector D. Ceniceros & Ruimeng Hu, 2023. "Stochastic Delay Differential Games: Financial Modeling and Machine Learning Algorithms," Papers 2307.06450, arXiv.org.
    14. Masaaki Fujii & Masashi Sekine, 2023. "Mean-field Equilibrium Price Formation with Exponential Utility," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-1210, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
    15. Daniel Lacker & Thaleia Zariphopoulou, 2017. "Mean field and n-agent games for optimal investment under relative performance criteria," Papers 1703.07685, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2018.
    16. Dianetti, Jodi & Riedel, Frank & Stanza, Lorenzo, 2024. "Optimal consumption and Investment under Relative Performance Criteria with Epstein-Zin Utility," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 685, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    17. Zongxia Liang & Keyu Zhang, 2023. "Time-inconsistent mean field and n-agent games under relative performance criteria," Papers 2312.14437, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2024.
    18. Guanxing Fu, 2022. "Mean Field Portfolio Games with Consumption," Papers 2206.05425, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2022.
    19. Goncalo dos Reis & Vadim Platonov, 2020. "Forward utility and market adjustments in relative investment-consumption games of many players," Papers 2012.01235, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2022.
    20. Guanxing Fu & Chao Zhou, 2021. "Mean Field Portfolio Games," Papers 2106.06185, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2022.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1907.03082. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.