IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2403.01012.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Hilbert Space-Valued LQ Mean Field Games: An Infinite-Dimensional Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Hanchao Liu
  • Dena Firoozi

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive study of linear-quadratic (LQ) mean field games (MFGs) in Hilbert spaces, generalizing the classic LQ MFG theory to scenarios involving $N$ agents with dynamics governed by infinite-dimensional stochastic equations. In this framework, both state and control processes of each agent take values in separable Hilbert spaces. All agents are coupled through the average state of the population which appears in their linear dynamics and quadratic cost functional. Specifically, the dynamics of each agent incorporates an infinite-dimensional noise, namely a $Q$-Wiener process, and an unbounded operator. The diffusion coefficient of each agent is stochastic involving the state, control, and average state processes. We first study the well-posedness of a system of $N$ coupled semilinear infinite-dimensional stochastic evolution equations establishing the foundation of MFGs in Hilbert spaces. We then specialize to $N$-player LQ games described above and study the asymptotic behaviour as the number of agents, $N$, approaches infinity. We develop an infinite-dimensional variant of the Nash Certainty Equivalence principle and characterize a unique Nash equilibrium for the limiting MFG. Finally, we study the connections between the $N$-player game and the limiting MFG, demonstrating that the empirical average state converges to the mean field and that the resulting limiting best-response strategies form an $\epsilon$-Nash equilibrium for the $N$-player game in Hilbert spaces.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanchao Liu & Dena Firoozi, 2024. "Hilbert Space-Valued LQ Mean Field Games: An Infinite-Dimensional Analysis," Papers 2403.01012, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2024.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2403.01012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.01012
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. Bensoussan & K. C. J. Sung & S. C. P. Yam & S. P. Yung, 2016. "Linear-Quadratic Mean Field Games," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 169(2), pages 496-529, May.
    2. René Carmona & Jean-Pierre Fouque & Seyyed Mostafa Mousavi & Li-Hsien Sun, 2018. "Systemic Risk and Stochastic Games with Delay," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 179(2), pages 366-399, November.
    3. Arvind V. Shrivats & Dena Firoozi & Sebastian Jaimungal, 2022. "A mean‐field game approach to equilibrium pricing in solar renewable energy certificate markets," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(3), pages 779-824, July.
    4. Bielecki, Tomasz R. & Pliska, Stanley R. & Sherris, Michael, 2000. "Risk sensitive asset allocation," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 24(8), pages 1145-1177, July.
    5. Giorgio Fabbri & Fausto Gozzi & Andrzej Swiech, 2017. "Stochastic Optimal Control in Infinite Dimensions - Dynamic Programming and HJB Equations," Post-Print hal-01505767, HAL.
    6. Jean-Pierre Fouque & Zhaoyu Zhang, 2018. "Mean Field Game with Delay: A Toy Model," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-17, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li-Hsien Sun, 2022. "Mean Field Games with Heterogeneous Groups: Application to Banking Systems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 192(1), pages 130-167, January.
    2. Li-Hsien Sun, 2019. "Systemic Risk and Heterogeneous Mean Field Type Interbank Network," Papers 1907.03082, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2019.
    3. Yan, Tingjin & Chiu, Mei Choi & Wong, Hoi Ying, 2023. "Portfolio liquidation with delayed information," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    4. Robert Balkin & Hector D. Ceniceros & Ruimeng Hu, 2023. "Stochastic Delay Differential Games: Financial Modeling and Machine Learning Algorithms," Papers 2307.06450, arXiv.org.
    5. Djehiche, Boualem & Gozzi, Fausto & Zanco, Giovanni & Zanella, Margherita, 2022. "Optimal portfolio choice with path dependent benchmarked labor income: A mean field model," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 48-85.
    6. René Carmona & Jean-Pierre Fouque & Seyyed Mostafa Mousavi & Li-Hsien Sun, 2018. "Systemic Risk and Stochastic Games with Delay," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 179(2), pages 366-399, November.
    7. Jean-Pierre Fouque & Zhaoyu Zhang, 2018. "Mean Field Game with Delay: A Toy Model," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-17, September.
    8. Eduardo Abi Jaber & Eyal Neuman & Moritz Vo{ss}, 2023. "Equilibrium in Functional Stochastic Games with Mean-Field Interaction," Papers 2306.05433, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.
    9. Zachary Feinstein & Andreas Sojmark, 2019. "A Dynamic Default Contagion Model: From Eisenberg-Noe to the Mean Field," Papers 1912.08695, arXiv.org.
    10. Emmanuelle Augeraud-Véron & Raouf Boucekkine & Vladimir Veliov, 2019. "Distributed Optimal Control Models in Environmental Economics: A Review," AMSE Working Papers 1902, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, France.
    11. Tiago Roux Oliveira & Victor Hugo Pereira Rodrigues & Miroslav Krstić & Tamer Başar, 2021. "Nash Equilibrium Seeking in Quadratic Noncooperative Games Under Two Delayed Information-Sharing Schemes," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 191(2), pages 700-735, December.
    12. William Lefebvre & Enzo Miller, 2021. "Linear-quadratic stochastic delayed control and deep learning resolution," Working Papers hal-03145949, HAL.
    13. Leitner Johannes, 2005. "Optimal portfolios with expected loss constraints and shortfall risk optimal martingale measures," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 23(1/2005), pages 49-66, January.
    14. Fu, Guanxing & Horst, Ulrich, 2017. "Mean Field Games with Singular Controls," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 22, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    15. Arvind Shrivats & Dena Firoozi & Sebastian Jaimungal, 2020. "A Mean-Field Game Approach to Equilibrium Pricing in Solar Renewable Energy Certificate Markets," Papers 2003.04938, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2021.
    16. Gerrard, Russell & Kyriakou, Ioannis & Nielsen, Jens Perch & Vodička, Peter, 2023. "On optimal constrained investment strategies for long-term savers in stochastic environments and probability hedging," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(2), pages 948-962.
    17. William Lefebvre & Enzo Miller, 2021. "Linear-quadratic stochastic delayed control and deep learning resolution," Papers 2102.09851, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2021.
    18. Ren'e Aid & Ofelia Bonesini & Giorgia Callegaro & Luciano Campi, 2021. "A McKean-Vlasov game of commodity production, consumption and trading," Papers 2111.04391, arXiv.org.
    19. Dianetti, Jodi & Ferrari, Giorgio & Fischer, Markus & Nendel, Max, 2022. "A Unifying Framework for Submodular Mean Field Games," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 661, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    20. Boucekkine, Raouf & Fabbri, Giorgio & Federico, Salvatore & Gozzi, Fausto, 2022. "A dynamic theory of spatial externalities," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 133-165.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2403.01012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.