IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joptap/v192y2022i1d10.1007_s10957-021-01955-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mean Field Games with Heterogeneous Groups: Application to Banking Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Li-Hsien Sun

    (National Central University)

Abstract

We study the system of heterogeneous lending and borrowing based on the relative average of log-capitalization given by the linear combination of the average within groups and ensemble average. Moreover, we describe the evolution of log-capitalization by using a system of coupled diffusions. The model incorporates a game feature with homogeneity within groups and heterogeneity among groups where banks search for the optimal strategies for lending to or borrowing from a central bank by minimizing the heterogeneous linear quadratic costs to avoid approaching the default barrier. The importance of relative concerns causes the relative ensemble average to be the critical determinant for lending and borrowing. The existence of closed- and open-loop Nash equilibria for the two-group case is validated by the solvability for the coupled Riccati equations. Both equilibria comprise the mean-reverting terms identical to the homogeneous game and all group averages owing to heterogeneity. The comparison of the obtained open- and closed-loop Nash equilibria is discussed. Furthermore, the existence of an approximate Nash equilibrium of the mean field games in the general d heterogeneous groups is verified. Finally, in financial implications, we study the influence of the incentive and relative parameters and also the number of banks on the corresponding liquidity rates through numerical analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Li-Hsien Sun, 2022. "Mean Field Games with Heterogeneous Groups: Application to Banking Systems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 192(1), pages 130-167, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:192:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10957-021-01955-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10957-021-01955-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10957-021-01955-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10957-021-01955-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Konstantinos Spiliopoulos & Jia Yang, 2019. "Network Effects in Default Clustering for Large Systems," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(6), pages 523-582, November.
    2. Jean-Pierre Fouque & Zhaoyu Zhang, 2018. "Mean Field Game with Delay: A Toy Model," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-17, September.
    3. A. Bensoussan & K. C. J. Sung & S. C. P. Yam & S. P. Yung, 2016. "Linear-Quadratic Mean Field Games," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 169(2), pages 496-529, May.
    4. Peter M. DeMarzo & Ron Kaniel & Ilan Kremer, 2008. "Relative Wealth Concerns and Financial Bubbles," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 21(1), pages 19-50, January.
    5. Daniel Lacker & Thaleia Zariphopoulou, 2019. "Mean field and n‐agent games for optimal investment under relative performance criteria," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 1003-1038, October.
    6. Gilles-Edouard Espinosa & Nizar Touzi, 2015. "Optimal Investment Under Relative Performance Concerns," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(2), pages 221-257, April.
    7. René Carmona & Jean-Pierre Fouque & Seyyed Mostafa Mousavi & Li-Hsien Sun, 2018. "Systemic Risk and Stochastic Games with Delay," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 179(2), pages 366-399, November.
    8. Fei Fang & Yiwei Sun & Konstantinos Spiliopoulos, 2016. "The effect of heterogeneity on flocking behavior and systemic risk," Papers 1607.08287, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2017.
    9. Li-Hsien Sun, 2018. "Systemic Risk and Interbank Lending," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 179(2), pages 400-424, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mao Fabrice Djete & Gaoyue Guo & Nizar Touzi, 2023. "Mean field game of mutual holding with defaultable agents, and systemic risk," Papers 2303.07996, arXiv.org.
    2. Bo, Lijun & Li, Tongqing & Yu, Xiang, 2022. "Centralized systemic risk control in the interbank system: Weak formulation and Gamma-convergence," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 622-654.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu-Jui Huang & Li-Hsien Sun, 2023. "Partial Information in a Mean-Variance Portfolio Selection Game," Papers 2312.04045, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2025.
    2. Zachary Feinstein & Andreas Sojmark, 2019. "A Dynamic Default Contagion Model: From Eisenberg-Noe to the Mean Field," Papers 1912.08695, arXiv.org.
    3. Li-Hsien Sun, 2019. "Systemic Risk and Heterogeneous Mean Field Type Interbank Network," Papers 1907.03082, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2019.
    4. Chao Deng & Xizhi Su & Chao Zhou, 2024. "Peer effect and dynamic ALM games among insurers," Mathematics and Financial Economics, Springer, volume 18, number 11, February.
    5. Han, Jinhui & Ma, Guiyuan & Yam, Sheung Chi Phillip, 2022. "Relative performance evaluation for dynamic contracts in a large competitive market," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(2), pages 768-780.
    6. Panagiotis E. Souganidis & Thaleia Zariphopoulou, 2024. "Mean field games with unbounded controlled common noise in portfolio management with relative performance criteria," Mathematics and Financial Economics, Springer, volume 18, number 10, February.
    7. Chao Deng & Xizhi Su & Chao Zhou, 2020. "Relative wealth concerns with partial information and heterogeneous priors," Papers 2007.11781, arXiv.org.
    8. Hanchao Liu & Dena Firoozi, 2024. "Hilbert Space-Valued LQ Mean Field Games: An Infinite-Dimensional Analysis," Papers 2403.01012, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2024.
    9. Eduardo Abi Jaber & Eyal Neuman & Moritz Vo{ss}, 2023. "Equilibrium in Functional Stochastic Games with Mean-Field Interaction," Papers 2306.05433, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.
    10. Curatola, Giuliano, 2022. "Price impact, strategic interaction and portfolio choice," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    11. Li-Hsien Sun, 2018. "Systemic Risk and Interbank Lending," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 179(2), pages 400-424, November.
    12. Masaaki Fujii & Masashi Sekine, 2023. "Mean-field Equilibrium Price Formation with Exponential Utility," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-1210, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
    13. Dianetti, Jodi & Riedel, Frank & Stanza, Lorenzo, 2024. "Optimal consumption and Investment under Relative Performance Criteria with Epstein-Zin Utility," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 685, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    14. Zongxia Liang & Keyu Zhang, 2023. "Time-inconsistent mean field and n-agent games under relative performance criteria," Papers 2312.14437, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2024.
    15. Yang, Yang & Wang, Guojing & Yao, Jing, 2024. "Time-consistent reinsurance-investment games for multiple mean-variance insurers with mispricing and default risks," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 79-107.
    16. Guanxing Fu, 2022. "Mean Field Portfolio Games with Consumption," Papers 2206.05425, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2022.
    17. Goncalo dos Reis & Vadim Platonov, 2020. "Forward utility and market adjustments in relative investment-consumption games of many players," Papers 2012.01235, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2022.
    18. Guanxing Fu & Chao Zhou, 2021. "Mean Field Portfolio Games," Papers 2106.06185, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2022.
    19. Bo, Lijun & Wang, Shihua & Zhou, Chao, 2024. "A mean field game approach to optimal investment and risk control for competitive insurers," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 202-217.
    20. Chotipong Charoensom & Thaisiri Watewai, 2022. "Optimal Liquidity Control and Systemic Risk in an Interbank Network with Liquidity Shocks and Regime-dependent Interconnectedness," PIER Discussion Papers 175, Puey Ungphakorn Institute for Economic Research.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:192:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10957-021-01955-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.