IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uersab/33619.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Voluntary Incentives for Reducing Agricultural Nonpoint Source Water Pollution

Author

Listed:
  • Feather, Peter
  • Cooper, Joseph C.

Abstract

Agricultural chemicals and sediment from cropland may reduce the quality of America's surface and ground water resources. The Clean Water Act stipulates that individual States are responsible for controlling agricultural nonpoint source pollution. Most State plans rely chiefly on education and technical assistance to promote the adoption of less polluting practices. Because profitability drives production decisions, these programs tend to be most successful when they promote inexpensive changes in existing practices. This report presents research findings on the success of incentive programs to control agricultural nonpoint source pollution.

Suggested Citation

  • Feather, Peter & Cooper, Joseph C., 1995. "Voluntary Incentives for Reducing Agricultural Nonpoint Source Water Pollution," Agricultural Information Bulletins 33619, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uersab:33619
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.33619
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/33619/files/ai950716.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.33619?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Osteen, Craig D. & Szmedra, Philip I., 1989. "Agricultural Pesticide Use Trends and Policy Issues," Agricultural Economic Reports 308081, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Malik, Arun S. & Larson, Bruce A. & Ribaudo, Marc, 1992. "Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution and Economic Incentive Policies: Issues in the Reauthorization of the Clean Water Act," Staff Reports 278684, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Vroomen, Harry & Larson, Bruce, 1991. "A direct approach for estimating Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and land demands at the regional level," Technical Bulletins 312320, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Crutchfield, Steve & Hansen, LeRoy & Ribaudo, Marc, 1993. "Agricultural and Water-Quality Conflicts: Economic Dimensions of the Problem," Agricultural Information Bulletins 309691, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Julia Talbot-Jones & Sophie Hale & Suzie Greenhalgh, 2020. "Review of policy instruments for freshwater management Abstract: As pressures on water resources increase in New Zealand, so does the need for alternative policy approaches that can adequately address," Working Papers 20_10, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.
    2. Mitchell, Paul D., 2004. "Nutrient Best Management Practice Insurance and Farmer Perceptions of Adoption Risk," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 36(3), pages 657-673, December.
    3. Zeuli, Kimberly A. & Skees, Jerry R., 2000. "Will Southern Agriculture Play A Role In A Carbon Market?," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 32(2), pages 1-14, August.
    4. Wen-Yuan Huang & Richard Heifner & Harold Taylor & Noel Uri, 2000. "Timing Nitrogen Fertilizer Application to Reduce Nitrogen Losses to the Environment," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 14(1), pages 35-58, February.
    5. repec:bla:canjag:v:58:y:2010:i:s1:p:481-496 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Homayounfar, Mehran & Muneepeerakul, Rachata & Martinez, Christopher J., 2023. "Navigating farming-BMP-policy interplay through a dynamical model," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    7. Li, Runwei & Wei, Chenyang & Afroz, Mahnaz Dil & Lyu, Jun & Chen, Gang, 2021. "A GIS-based framework for local agricultural decision-making and regional crop yield simulation," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    8. McCann, Laura M.J., 2000. "Evolution of Agri-Environmental Policy in the United States," 2000 Conference (44th), January 23-25, 2000, Sydney, Australia 171921, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    9. Reeling, Carson J. & Weir, A.E. & Swinton, Scott M. & Hayes, R.C., 2012. "A comparative breakeven net return threshold to guide development of conservation technologies with application to perennial wheat," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124723, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shoemaker, Robbin A. & Malik, Arun S., 1993. "Optimal Cost-Sharing Programs to Reduce Agricultural Pollution," Technical Bulletins 157045, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Knutson, Ronald D., 1990. "External Influences on Agriculture: Societal, Environmental and Global Economy," Policy Issues Papers 257861, Texas A&M University, Agricultural and Food Policy Center.
    3. Borisova, Tatiana & Shortle, James S. & Horan, Richard D. & Abler, David G., 2003. "The Value Of Ecological And Economic Information In Water Quality Management," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 22180, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    4. Wilson, Clevo & Tisdell, Clem, 2001. "Why farmers continue to use pesticides despite environmental, health and sustainability costs," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 449-462, December.
    5. Ollinger, Michael & Fernandez-Cornejo, Jorge, 1998. "Innovation and Regulation in the Pesticide Industry," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(1), pages 15-27, April.
    6. Ollinger, Michael & Fernandez-Cornejo, Jorge, 1995. "Regulation, Innovation, and Market Structure in the U.S. Pesticide Industry," Agricultural Economic Reports 308425, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    7. Graham, Mary, 2004. "Environmental efficiency: Meaning and measurement and application to Australian dairy farms," 2004 Conference (48th), February 11-13, 2004, Melbourne, Australia 58450, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    8. Lynch, Sarah, 1994. "Designing Green Support Programs," Policy Studies Program Reports, Henry A. Wallace Institute for Alternative Agriculture, number 134111, January.
    9. Whittaker, Gerald W. & Lin, Biing-Hwan & Vasavada, Utpal, 1995. "Restricting Pesticide Use: The Impact On Profitability By Farm Size," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 27(2), pages 1-11, December.
    10. Shumway, C. Richard & Chesser, Rayanne R., 1994. "Pesticide Tax, Cropping Patterns, and Water Quality in South Central Texas," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(1), pages 224-240, July.
    11. Ben-Haim, Yakov & Osteen, Craig D. & Moffitt, L. Joe, 2013. "Policy dilemma of innovation: An info-gap approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 130-138.
    12. Archer, David Walter, 1995. "Self-insurance and self-protection in weed control: implications for nonpoint source pollution," ISU General Staff Papers 1995010108000012033, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    13. Fernandez-Cornejo, Jorge, 1992. "Short- And Long-Run Demand And Substitution Of Agricultural Inputs," Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 21(1), pages 1-14, April.
    14. Grames, Johanna & Zoboli, Ottavia & Laner, David & Rechberger, Helmut & Zessner, Matthias & Sánchez-Romero, Miguel & Prskawetz, Alexia, 2019. "Understanding feedbacks between economic decisions and the phosphorus resource cycle: A general equilibrium model including material flows," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 311-347.
    15. Ribaudo, Marc & Shoemaker, Robbin A., 1995. "The Effect Of Feedgrain Program Participation On Chemical Use," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 24(2), pages 1-10, October.
    16. Intarapapong, Walaiporn & Hite, Diane & Hudson, Darren, 2002. "The Economic And Environmental Impacts Of Variable Rate Fertilizer Application: The Case Of Mississippi," Research Reports 15801, Mississippi State University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    17. Swinton, Scott M. & King, Robert P., 1990. "Weedsim: A Bioeconomic Model Of Weed Management In Corn," Staff Papers 14164, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    18. James S. Shortle & Andrew Laughland, 1994. "Impacts Of Taxes To Reduce Agrichemical Use When Farm Policy Is Endogenous," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(1), pages 3-14, January.
    19. Archer, David W. & Shogren, Jason F., 2001. "Risk-indexed herbicide taxes to reduce ground and surface water pollution: an integrated ecological economics evaluation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 227-250, August.
    20. Onianwa, Odili & Alderfer, Richard & Levins, Richard A., 1992. "Taxation As A Means Of Reducing Nitrogen Fertilizer Use In Minnesota Corn Production," Staff Papers 13281, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Environmental Economics and Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersab:33619. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.