IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/sbrfsr/109784.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

As Indicações Geográficas: Barreira Não Tarifaria Ou Dinamizadora De Desenvolvimento Local/Regional?

Author

Listed:
  • Blume, Roni
  • Pedrozo, Eugenio Avila

Abstract

No contexto do comércio internacional as Indicações Geográficas – IG’s têm surgido como um instrumento político-jurídicos para promover e resguardar a originalidade e a procedência de um produto. Contudo, muitas destas normativas têm sido alvo de críticas, à medida que se formalizam como barreiras não-tarifárias e promovem assimetrias no comercio internacional entre os países. Por outro lado, para se estabelecer as IG’s são necessárias mudanças nos padrões produtivos que acabam dinamizando o desenvolvimento socioeconômico de um local/região. Dentro deste contexto o objetivo deste artigo é promover a discussão do papel das Indicações Geográficas, seus condicionamentos que se configuram com barreiras não-tarifarias e a sua potencialidade para dinamizar o desenvolvimento local/regional no Brasil. Como resultado observou-se que discussão das IG’s estão restritas somente à esfera Legal e consideram a realidade dos sistemas produtivos como homogênea entre os países, potencializando o surgimento de barreiras não-tarifárias. Por outro lado, pode-se observar através das modificações socioeconômicas causadas pela Indicação de Procedência Vale dos Vinhedos que as IG’s podem ser uma alternativa para dinamizar o desenvolvimento local/regional no Brasil.---------------------------------------------In the context of international commerce, Geographical Indications – GIs have appeared as a juridical and political instrument to promote and guard the originality and source of a product. However, many of these regulations have been the target of criticism, when they are formalized as non-tariff barriers, thus promoting asymmetries in the international commerce among countries. On the other hand, for the establishment of GIs, some changes are necessary in the production patterns, seeking to activate the social-economical development of a place/region. Considering this context, the objective of this article is to promote the discussion of the role of Geographical Indications, the conditioners that configure it with non-tariff barriers and its potentiality to assist in the local/regional development of Brazil. As a result, it was observed that the discussion of the GIs is restricted only to the Legal sphere and consider the reality of production systems as homogeneous among countries, thus enabling the appearance of non-tariff barriers. On the other hand, it could be observed through the social-economical changes caused by the Vale dos Vinhedos Indication of Origin, that GIs could be considered an alternative for the promotion of the local/regional development of Brazil.

Suggested Citation

  • Blume, Roni & Pedrozo, Eugenio Avila, 2008. "As Indicações Geográficas: Barreira Não Tarifaria Ou Dinamizadora De Desenvolvimento Local/Regional?," 46th Congress, July 20-23, 2008, Rio Branco, Acre, Brazil 109784, Sociedade Brasileira de Economia, Administracao e Sociologia Rural (SOBER).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:sbrfsr:109784
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.109784
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/109784/files/543.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.109784?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thiedig, Frank & Sylvander, Bertil, 2000. "Welcome to the Club? - An Economical Approach to Geographical Indications in the European Union," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 49(12).
    2. Tim Josling, 2006. "The War on Terroir: Geographical Indications as a Transatlantic Trade Conflict," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(3), pages 337-363, September.
    3. Alessandro Stanziani, 2004. "Wine Reputation and Quality Controls: The Origin of the AOCs in 19th Century France," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 149-167, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Biénabe, Estelle & Marie-Vivien, Delphine, 2017. "Institutionalizing Geographical Indications in Southern Countries: Lessons Learned from Basmati and Rooibos," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 58-67.
    2. Cei, Leonardo & Stefani, Gianluca & Defrancesco, Edi, 2020. "The role of group-time treatment effect heterogeneity in long standing European agricultural policies. An application to the European geographical indication policy," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 9(1), April.
    3. Tauber, Ramona & Anders, Sven M. & Langinier, Corinne, 2011. "The Economics of Geographical Indications: Welfare Implications," Working Papers 103262, Structure and Performance of Agriculture and Agri-products Industry (SPAA).
    4. Teuber, Ramona, 2011. "Protecting Geographical Indications: Lessons learned from the Economic Literature," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 116081, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Armelle Mazé, 2023. "Geographical indications as global knowledge commons: Ostrom's law on common intellectual property and collective action," Post-Print hal-04063797, HAL.
    6. Leonardo Cei & Edi Defrancesco & Gianluca Stefani, 2018. "From Geographical Indications to Rural Development: A Review of the Economic Effects of European Union Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-21, October.
    7. Duvaleix, Sabine & Emlinger, Charlotte & Gaigné, Carl & Latouche, Karine, 2021. "Geographical indications and trade: Firm-level evidence from the French cheese industry," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    8. Koji Domon & Alessandro Melcarne & Giovanni B. Ramello, 2022. "Fake & original: the case of Japanese food in Southeast Asian countries," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 327-347, October.
    9. Johan Swinnen & Alessandro Olper & Senne Vandevelde, 2021. "From unfair prices to unfair trading practices: Political economy, value chains and 21st century agri‐food policy," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 52(5), pages 771-788, September.
    10. Luisa Menapace & Gregory Colson & Carola Grebitus & Maria Facendola, 2011. "Consumers' preferences for geographical origin labels: evidence from the Canadian olive oil market," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 38(2), pages 193-212, June.
    11. Mariagiulia Mariani & François Casabianca & Claire Cerdan & Iuri Peri, 2021. "Protecting Food Cultural Biodiversity: From Theory to Practice. Challenging the Geographical Indications and the Slow Food Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, May.
    12. Kyriakos Drivas & Constantine Iliopoulos, 2017. "An Empirical Investigation in the Relationship Between PDOs/PGIs and Trademarks," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 8(2), pages 585-595, June.
    13. Susana López‐Bayón & Marta Fernández‐Barcala & Manuel González‐Díaz, 2020. "In search of agri‐food quality for wine: Is it enough to join a geographical indication?," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(4), pages 568-590, October.
    14. Gorton, Matthew & Torok, Aron & Tregear, Angela, 2014. "The Impact of EU Agri-food Quality Policy in the New Member States: A Case Study of the Makó Onion PDO," 142nd Seminar, May 29-30, 2014, Budapest, Hungary 169085, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Viju, Crina & Yeung, May T. & Kerr, William A., 2012. "Geographical Indications, Barriers to Market Access and Preferential Trade Agreements," Commissioned Papers 122741, Canadian Agricultural Trade Policy Research Network.
    16. Loïc Henry, 2023. "Adapting the designated area of geographical indications to climate change," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 105(4), pages 1088-1115, August.
    17. Fabio Gaetano Santeramo & Emilia Lamonaca, 2019. "The Effects of Non‐tariff Measures on Agri‐food Trade: A Review and Meta‐analysis of Empirical Evidence," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(3), pages 595-617, September.
    18. Sarah Bowen & Tad Mutersbaugh, 2014. "Local or localized? Exploring the contributions of Franco-Mediterranean agrifood theory to alternative food research," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 31(2), pages 201-213, June.
    19. Emlinger, Charlotte & Latouche, Karine, 2022. "Protection of Geographical Indications in Trade Agreements: is it worth it?," 2022: Transforming Global Value Chains, December 11-13, Clearwater Beach, FL 339444, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    20. Franck, Raphaël & Johnson, Noel D. & Nye, John V.C., 2014. "From internal taxes to national regulation: Evidence from a French wine tax reform at the turn of the twentieth century," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 77-93.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Crop Production/Industries;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:sbrfsr:109784. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/soberea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.