IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/jhimwp/310008.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Lebensmittelabfälle in derAußer-Haus-Verpflegung–Ursachen, Hemmnisse und Perspektiven –

Author

Listed:
  • Kuntscher, Manuela
  • Schmidt, Thomas
  • Goossens, Yanne

Abstract

The present study was executed within the context of the ELoFoS project (Efficient Lowering of Food Waste in the Out-of-Home Sector). The aim of this study was to aggregate new knowledge about food waste in the Out-of-Home Sector and to examine the transferability of reduction measures from the ELoFoS project to other enterprises within the Out-of-Home Sector. The causes of food waste in the Out-of-Home Sector were determined with literature research, expert interviews with kitchen managers as well as discussions with project and practice partners of the ELoFoS project. The expert interviews with kitchen managers provided insights into the workflow of commercial kitchens and information on impediments, incentives and motivations affecting the implementation of reduction measures. In addition, data on food waste was collected using a questionnaire. The expert interviews and questionnaires were carried out in food services (care and business sector). Based on the questionnaires, the average annual food waste volumes generated in a commercial kitchen amount to about 28 tons. This result is injust under 100g of food waste per meal. In monetary terms, this relates to more than €100,000 per year and kitchen; or 38 cents per meal. In particular waste from serving and plate left overs often led to food waste. Ready-to-eat meals are associated with high economic and ecological impacts. Raising food waste awareness among kitchen and service staff can have a positive influence on the implementation of reduction measures. Financial incentives for business and staff can also help to reduce food waste. Impediments to the reduction of food waste include difficulties in assessing demand, and the high expectations of guests. Motivations for kitchen managers to reduce food waste include economic and ecological concerns, but also a question of moral responsibility. Due to the heterogeneity of the Out-of-Home Sector, plans to counteract the causes, and therefore apply reduction measures, have to be adapted to the specificities of each commercial kitchen. Nevertheless, some general recommendations for action could be derived: optimization of the guest area, provision of support to kitchen and service staff, and implementation of continuous waste monitoring. Continuous waste monitoring visualizes food waste volumes and thus contributes to sensitizing the staff. Waste monitoring also reveals potential for reduction. Furthermore, the data collected allows food waste reduction measures to be derived and planning parameters to be forecasted. Some of the kitchen managers had already implemented a wide range of reduction measures in their commercial kitchens: 43% had even carried out a waste monitoring. 71% are open for new ideas. As such, the kitchen managers are generally positive about new measures. To what extent the measures from the ELoFoS project can actually be transferred to other enterprises within the Out-of-Home sector has to be decided individually for each commercial kitchen.

Suggested Citation

  • Kuntscher, Manuela & Schmidt, Thomas & Goossens, Yanne, 2021. "Lebensmittelabfälle in derAußer-Haus-Verpflegung–Ursachen, Hemmnisse und Perspektiven –," Thünen Working Paper 310008, Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (vTI), Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:jhimwp:310008
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.310008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/310008/files/dn063075.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.310008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Niels Winkler & Martin Kroh & Martin Spieß, 2006. "Entwicklung einer deutschen Kurzskala zur zweidimensionalen Messung von sozialer Erwünschtheit," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 579, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    2. Bettina A. Lorenz & Monika Hartmann & Stefan Hirsch & Olga Kanz & Nina Langen, 2017. "Determinants of Plate Leftovers in One German Catering Company," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-17, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kuntscher, Manuela & Schmidt, Thomas G. & Goossens, Yanne, 2020. "Lebensmittelabfälle in der Außer-Haus-Verpflegung: Ursachen, Hemmnisse und Perspektiven," Thünen Working Papers 161, Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute, Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    2. Kuntscher, Manuela & Schmidt, Thomas & Goossens, Yanne, 2021. "Lebensmittelabfälle in derAußer-Haus-Verpflegung –Ursachen, Hemmnisse und Perspektiven –," Thünen Working Paper 309546, Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (vTI), Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    3. Katharina Werner, 2019. "The Role of Information for Public Preferences on Education – Evidence from Representative Survey Experiments," ifo Beiträge zur Wirtschaftsforschung, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 82, March.
    4. Julius Grund & Antje Brock, 2019. "Why We Should Empty Pandora’s Box to Create a Sustainable Future: Hope, Sustainability and Its Implications for Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-20, February.
    5. Gabriel, Andreas & Rombach, Meike & Wieser, Hannah & Bitsch, Vera, 2021. "Got waste: knowledge, behavior and self-assessment on food waste of university students in Germany," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 24(6), February.
    6. Börger, Tobias, 2011. "A direct test of socially desirable responding in contingent valuation interviews," FZID Discussion Papers 40-2011, University of Hohenheim, Center for Research on Innovation and Services (FZID).
    7. Maxime Sebbane & Sandrine Costa & Lucie Sirieix, 2017. "Redonner du contrôle aux usagers : évaluation des effets d’une intervention comportementale sur la réduction du gaspillage en restauration collective," Working Papers hal-01616617, HAL.
    8. Julius Grund & Antje Brock, 2020. "Education for Sustainable Development in Germany: Not Just Desired but Also Effective for Transformative Action," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, April.
    9. Naef, Michael & Schupp, Jürgen, 2009. "Measuring Trust: Experiments and Surveys in Contrast and Combination," IZA Discussion Papers 4087, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    10. Christopher Malefors & Pieter Callewaert & Per-Anders Hansson & Hanna Hartikainen & Oona Pietiläinen & Ingrid Strid & Christina Strotmann & Mattias Eriksson, 2019. "Towards a Baseline for Food-Waste Quantification in the Hospitality Sector—Quantities and Data Processing Criteria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-22, June.
    11. Ludovica Principato & Stefano Marchetti & Marco Barbanera & Luca Ruini & Leonardo Capoccia & Camilla Comis & Luca Secondi, 2023. "Introducing digital tools for sustainable food supply management: Tackling food loss and waste in industrial canteens," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(4), pages 1060-1075, August.
    12. Delley, Mathilde & Brunner, Thomas A., 2017. "Foodwaste within Swiss households: A segmentation of the population and suggestions for preventive measures," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 172-184.
    13. Clemens Koob, 2021. "Determinants of content marketing effectiveness: Conceptual framework and empirical findings from a managerial perspective," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-25, April.
    14. Simone Schneider & Jürgen Schupp, 2011. "The Social Comparison Scale: Testing the Validity, Reliability, and Applicability of the Iowa-Netherlands Comparison Orientation Measure (INCOM) on the German Population," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 360, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    15. Funke, Katja & Hirschauer, Norbert & Peth, Denise & Mußhoff, Oliver & Becker, Oliver Arránz, 2019. "Can personality traits explain compliance behaviour? - A study of compliance with water-protection rules in German agriculture," SocArXiv jnexr, Center for Open Science.
    16. Simone Schneider & Jürgen Schupp, 2014. "Individual Differences in Social Comparison and its Consequences for Life Satisfaction: Introducing a Short Scale of the Iowa–Netherlands Comparison Orientation Measure," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 115(2), pages 767-789, January.
    17. Marzena Tomaszewska & Beata Bilska & Danuta Kołożyn-Krajewska, 2022. "Behavior of Polish Consumers in Relation to Meals Ordered in Food Service Establishments in the Context of Plate Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-17, July.
    18. Matthew James Grainger & Lusine Aramyan & Simone Piras & Thomas Edward Quested & Simone Righi & Marco Setti & Matteo Vittuari & Gavin Bruce Stewart, 2018. "Model selection and averaging in the assessment of the drivers of household food waste to reduce the probability of false positives," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, February.
    19. Adnan Zogaj & Dieter K. Tscheulin & Jörg Lindenmeier & Stephan Olk, 2021. "Linking actual self-congruence, ideal self-congruence, and functional congruence to donor loyalty: the moderating role of issue involvement," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 91(3), pages 379-400, April.
    20. Thomas Stöber & Peter Kotzian & Barbara E. Weißenberger, 2019. "Design matters: on the impact of compliance program design on corporate ethics," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 12(2), pages 383-424, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jhimwp:310008. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/imagvde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.