IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ifma19/345900.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Pr - Carbon Neutral Brazilian Beef: An Analysis Of Its Economic Viability For Livestock Sustainable Intensification

Author

Listed:
  • Pereira, Mariana de Aragão
  • de Almeida, Roberto Giolo
  • Laura, Valdemir Antonio
  • Costa, Fernando Paim
  • Alves, Fabiana Villa

Abstract

This study analyses the economic viability of Carbon Neutral Brazilian Beef (CNBB), proposed by EMBRAPA, as an alternative for sustainable intensification of beef farming in Brazil. A 12-year cash flow was built for two integrated crop- livestock-forestry systems (ICLF) in the Cerrado region, following the guidelines of CNBB protocol. Both included soybean and cattle, but ICLF1 had 227 eucalyptus trees/ha while ICLF2 had 357 eucalyptus trees/ha. Investment analysis showed both systems were economically viable, with ICLF1, with less trees, performing better than ICLF2. Two scenarios under CNBB protocol, considering premium beef prices and costs assumed either by farmers or by the meat processing companies, indicate CNBB can add value to beef production and generate additional income, while contributing to the environment and to animal welfare. Further analyses must follow, to set the guidelines for additional development of the CNBB market.

Suggested Citation

  • Pereira, Mariana de Aragão & de Almeida, Roberto Giolo & Laura, Valdemir Antonio & Costa, Fernando Paim & Alves, Fabiana Villa, 2019. "Pr - Carbon Neutral Brazilian Beef: An Analysis Of Its Economic Viability For Livestock Sustainable Intensification," 22nd Congress, Tasmania, Australia, March 3-8, 2019 345900, International Farm Management Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ifma19:345900
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.345900
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/345900/files/PR-2019-IFMA_Pereira_101-1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.345900?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martha, Geraldo B. & Alves, Eliseu & Contini, Elisio, 2012. "Land-saving approaches and beef production growth in Brazil," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 173-177.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Benjamin T. Phalan, 2018. "What Have We Learned from the Land Sparing-sharing Model?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-24, May.
    2. Zanetti De Lima, C. & Gurgel, A. & Teixeira, E.C., 2018. "Synergies of low-carbon technologies and land-sparing in Brazilian regions," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277091, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Zhang, Congying & Xiang, Jingru & Chang, Qian, 2023. "Does Informatization Cause the Relative Substitution Bias of Agricultural Machinery Inputs for Labor Inputs? Evidence from Apple Farmers in China," Research on World Agricultural Economy, Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte Ltd (NASS), vol. 4(3), September.
    4. De Oliveira Silva, Rafael & Barioni, Luis Gustavo & Queiroz Pellegrino, Giampaolo & Moran, Dominic, 2018. "The role of agricultural intensification in Brazil's Nationally Determined Contribution on emissions mitigation," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 102-112.
    5. Jonathan Gonçalves Da Silva & Joaquim Bento De Souza Ferreira Filho, 2016. "Climate Change, Agriculture And Livestock Intensification In Brazil: The Borlaug Hypothesis," Anais do XLIII Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 43rd Brazilian Economics Meeting] 184, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    6. Söder, Mareike, 2014. "EU biofuel policies in practice: A carbon map for the Brazilian Cerrado," Kiel Working Papers 1966, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    7. Andrew P. Barnes & Amanda Lucas & Gregory Maio, 2016. "Quantifying ambivalence towards sustainable intensification: an exploration of the UK public’s values," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 8(3), pages 609-619, June.
    8. de Oliveira Silva, Rafael & Barioni, Luis G. & Albertini, Tiago Zanett & Eory, Vera & Topp, Cairistiona F.E. & Fernandes, Fernando A. & Moran, Dominic, 2015. "Developing a nationally appropriate mitigation measure from the greenhouse gas GHG abatement potential from livestock production in the Brazilian Cerrado," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 48-55.
    9. Pereira, Mariana de Aragão & de Almeida, Roberto Giolo, 2022. "Economic And Socio-Environmental Impact Assessment Of A Silvopastoral System In Mato Grosso Do Sul State, Brazil," Agricultural Economics Society (AES) 98th Annual Conference, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK, March 18-20, 2024 345973, Agricultural Economics Society (AES).
    10. Brian J. Revell, 2015. "One Man's Meat … 2050? Ruminations on Future Meat Demand in the Context of Global Warming," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 66(3), pages 573-614, September.
    11. Justin Caron & Gilbert E. Metcalf & John Reilly, 2017. "The CO2 Content of Consumption Across U.S. Regions: A Multi-Regional Input-Output (MRIO) Approach," The Energy Journal, , vol. 38(1), pages 1-22, January.
    12. Queiroz, P. & Silva, F.D.F. & Fulginiti, L., 2018. "How did technical change affect land use in Brazilian agriculture?," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277318, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. West, Thales A.P. & Fearnside, Philip M., 2021. "Brazil’s conservation reform and the reduction of deforestation in Amazonia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    14. Bowman, Maria S., 2016. "Impact of foot-and-mouth disease status on deforestation in Brazilian Amazon and cerrado municipalities between 2000 and 2010," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 25-40.
    15. Martini, Denise Zanatta & Aragão, Luiz Eduardo Oliveira e Cruz de & Sanches, Ieda Del'Arco & Galdos, Marcelo Valadares & da Silva, Cinthia Rubio Urbano & Dalla-Nora, Eloi Lennon, 2018. "Land availability for sugarcane derived jet-biofuels in São Paulo—Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 256-262.
    16. Geraldo B. Martha & Elisio Contini & Eliseu Alves, 2012. "Embrapa: Its Origins and Changes," Chapters, in: Werner Baer (ed.), The Regional Impact of National Policies, chapter 12, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. Stabile, Marcelo C.C. & Guimarães, André L. & Silva, Daniel S. & Ribeiro, Vivian & Macedo, Marcia N. & Coe, Michael T. & Pinto, Erika & Moutinho, Paulo & Alencar, Ane, 2020. "Solving Brazil's land use puzzle: Increasing production and slowing Amazon deforestation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    18. de Andrade Junior, Milton Aurelio Uba & Valin, Hugo & Soterroni, Aline C. & Ramos, Fernando M. & Halog, Anthony, 2019. "Exploring future scenarios of ethanol demand in Brazil and their land-use implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    19. le Polain de Waroux, Yann & Garrett, Rachael D. & Graesser, Jordan & Nolte, Christoph & White, Christopher & Lambin, Eric F., 2019. "The Restructuring of South American Soy and Beef Production and Trade Under Changing Environmental Regulations," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 188-202.
    20. Caram, Nicolas & Soca, Pablo & Sollenberger, Lynn E. & Baethgen, Walter & Wallau, Marcelo O. & Mailhos, María E., 2023. "Studying beef production evolution to plan for ecological intensification of grazing ecosystems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ifma19:345900. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifmaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.