IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aes324/345973.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Economic And Socio-Environmental Impact Assessment Of A Silvopastoral System In Mato Grosso Do Sul State, Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Pereira, Mariana de Aragão
  • de Almeida, Roberto Giolo

Abstract

Silvopastoral systems, also known in Brazil as Integrated Livestock-Forestry Systems (ILFS), are a promising alternative for marginal agricultural areas in Mato Grosso do Sul state. This paper analysed the economic viability of a representative ILFS in the state Central-East region and, using Ambitec-Agro model, assessed the associated socio-environmental impacts. We used panel data with experts to build an eight-year cash flow used in follow-up investment analysis and found ILFS was more economically attractive then extensive beef systems (BF), typical in poor soil regions. However, implementation costs and uneven distribution of income over the years can be detrimental to adoption by some farmer groups. Results showed an improvement of several socio-environmental indicators by replacing BF for ILFS. Policymakers should account for those economic barriers when developing supporting strategies for farmers and should also promote specific initiatives to stimulate the forestry sector, in general, and Silvopastoral systems specifically, in other marginal areas of Mato Grosso do Sul state.

Suggested Citation

  • Pereira, Mariana de Aragão & de Almeida, Roberto Giolo, 2022. "Economic And Socio-Environmental Impact Assessment Of A Silvopastoral System In Mato Grosso Do Sul State, Brazil," Agricultural Economics Society (AES) 98th Annual Conference, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK, March 18-20, 2024 345973, Agricultural Economics Society (AES).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aes324:345973
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.345973
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/345973/files/economic_and_socio-environmental_impact_assessment_of_a_silvopastoral_system_in_mato_grosso_do_sul_state_brazil.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.345973?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martha, Geraldo B. & Alves, Eliseu & Contini, Elisio, 2012. "Land-saving approaches and beef production growth in Brazil," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 173-177.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pereira, Mariana de Aragão & de Almeida, Roberto Giolo & Laura, Valdemir Antonio & Costa, Fernando Paim & Alves, Fabiana Villa, 2019. "Pr - Carbon Neutral Brazilian Beef: An Analysis Of Its Economic Viability For Livestock Sustainable Intensification," 22nd Congress, Tasmania, Australia, March 3-8, 2019 345900, International Farm Management Association.
    2. Martini, Denise Zanatta & Aragão, Luiz Eduardo Oliveira e Cruz de & Sanches, Ieda Del'Arco & Galdos, Marcelo Valadares & da Silva, Cinthia Rubio Urbano & Dalla-Nora, Eloi Lennon, 2018. "Land availability for sugarcane derived jet-biofuels in São Paulo—Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 256-262.
    3. Söder, Mareike, 2014. "EU biofuel policies in practice: A carbon map for the Brazilian Cerrado," Kiel Working Papers 1966, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    4. Zanetti De Lima, C. & Gurgel, A. & Teixeira, E.C., 2018. "Synergies of low-carbon technologies and land-sparing in Brazilian regions," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277091, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Queiroz, P. & Silva, F.D.F. & Fulginiti, L., 2018. "How did technical change affect land use in Brazilian agriculture?," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277318, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Gianetti, Giovani William & Filho, Joaquim Bento de Souza Ferreira, 2024. "Pasture recovery, emissions, and the Brazilian Paris agreement commitments," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    7. Benjamin T. Phalan, 2018. "What Have We Learned from the Land Sparing-sharing Model?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-24, May.
    8. de Oliveira Silva, Rafael & Barioni, Luis G. & Albertini, Tiago Zanett & Eory, Vera & Topp, Cairistiona F.E. & Fernandes, Fernando A. & Moran, Dominic, 2015. "Developing a nationally appropriate mitigation measure from the greenhouse gas GHG abatement potential from livestock production in the Brazilian Cerrado," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 48-55.
    9. Stabile, Marcelo C.C. & Guimarães, André L. & Silva, Daniel S. & Ribeiro, Vivian & Macedo, Marcia N. & Coe, Michael T. & Pinto, Erika & Moutinho, Paulo & Alencar, Ane, 2020. "Solving Brazil's land use puzzle: Increasing production and slowing Amazon deforestation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    10. De Oliveira Silva, Rafael & Barioni, Luis Gustavo & Queiroz Pellegrino, Giampaolo & Moran, Dominic, 2018. "The role of agricultural intensification in Brazil's Nationally Determined Contribution on emissions mitigation," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 102-112.
    11. Galdos, Marcelo & Cavalett, Otávio & Seabra, Joaquim E.A. & Nogueira, Luiz Augusto Horta & Bonomi, Antonio, 2013. "Trends in global warming and human health impacts related to Brazilian sugarcane ethanol production considering black carbon emissions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 576-582.
    12. Zhang, Congying & Xiang, Jingru & Chang, Qian, 2023. "Does Informatization Cause the Relative Substitution Bias of Agricultural Machinery Inputs for Labor Inputs? Evidence from Apple Farmers in China," Research on World Agricultural Economy, Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte Ltd (NASS), vol. 4(3), September.
    13. le Polain de Waroux, Yann & Garrett, Rachael D. & Graesser, Jordan & Nolte, Christoph & White, Christopher & Lambin, Eric F., 2019. "The Restructuring of South American Soy and Beef Production and Trade Under Changing Environmental Regulations," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 188-202.
    14. Justin Caron, Gilbert E. Metcalf, and John Reilly, 2017. "The CO 2 Content of Consumption Across U.S. Regions: A Multi-Regional Input-Output (MRIO) Approach," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 1).
    15. Bowman, Maria S., 2016. "Impact of foot-and-mouth disease status on deforestation in Brazilian Amazon and cerrado municipalities between 2000 and 2010," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 25-40.
    16. Arnaldo Walter & Marcelo Valadares Galdos & Fabio Vale Scarpare & Manoel Regis Lima Verde Leal & Joaquim Eugênio Abel Seabra & Marcelo Pereira da Cunha & Michelle Cristina Araujo Picoli & Camila Ortol, 2014. "Brazilian sugarcane ethanol: developments so far and challenges for the future," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 3(1), pages 70-92, January.
    17. de Oliveira Silva, Rafael & Barioni, Luis Gustavo & Hall, J. A. Julian & Moretti, Antonio Carlos & Fonseca Veloso, Rui & Alexander, Peter & Crespolini, Mariane & Moran, Dominic, 2017. "Sustainable intensification of Brazilian livestock production through optimized pasture restoration," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 201-211.
    18. Jonathan Gonçalves Da Silva & Joaquim Bento De Souza Ferreira Filho, 2016. "Climate Change, Agriculture And Livestock Intensification In Brazil: The Borlaug Hypothesis," Anais do XLIII Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 43rd Brazilian Economics Meeting] 184, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    19. Barnes, Andrew Peter, 2012. "A method for constructing an index of sustainable intensification within the developed country context," Working Papers 131466, Scotland's Rural College (formerly Scottish Agricultural College), Land Economy & Environment Research Group.
    20. Andrew P. Barnes & Amanda Lucas & Gregory Maio, 2016. "Quantifying ambivalence towards sustainable intensification: an exploration of the UK public’s values," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 8(3), pages 609-619, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Livestock Production/Industries;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aes324:345973. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.aes.ac.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.