IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/icar24/344974.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Economic Potential of Biological Substitutes for Agrochemicals

Author

Listed:
  • Birthal, Pratap S.

Abstract

Pesticides, together with the high yielding seeds, fertilizers and irrigation, have made substantial contributions towards making India food selfsufficient. But in recent years, they have come under severe criticism because of their negative externalities to the environment and human health. Besides, the pest-induced losses have been increasing, despite increasing use of pesticides. Biological alternatives to pesticides have been proposed since long, and are claimed to provide effective solutions to the pest problem. Their use, however, has remained extremely low due to a number of technological, socio-economic and institutional constraints. Nevertheless, with rising public awareness of the negative externalities of the chemical pesticides, coupled with the increasing demand for chemical-free food, the biological pest management is going to occupy an important place in the future plant protection strategies. This study makes an important contribution towards understanding the economics of biological pest management visà- vis chemical pest management under the experimental as well as the field conditions, and the problems/constraints in the adoption of biological pest management technologies by the farmers, besides providing a critical review of the plant protection policy. The general conclusion is that the biological pest management technologies have the potential to substitute the chemical pesticides without demanding additional resources, and with no adverse effect on agricultural productivity, given the adequate technological, economic and institutional support. The study has been vetted by the peers, and it is expected that the results will guide the researchers, extension workers and policymakers in taking appropriate steps to accelerate the adoption of biological pest management technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Birthal, Pratap S., 2003. "Economic Potential of Biological Substitutes for Agrochemicals," Policy Papers 344974, ICAR National Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research (NIAP).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:icar24:344974
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.344974
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/344974/files/Economic%20Potential%20of%20Biological%20Substitutes%20for%20Agrochemicals.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.344974?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Birthal, Pratap S. & Sharma, O.P. & Kumar, Sant, 2000. "Economics of Integrated Pest Management: Evidences and Issues," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 55(4), December.
    2. Polson, Rudulph A. & Spencer, Dunstan S. C., 1991. "The technology adoption process in subsistence agriculture: The case of cassava in Southwestern Nigeria," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 65-78.
    3. Adesina, Akinwumi A. & Baidu-Forson, Jojo, 1995. "Farmers' perceptions and adoption of new agricultural technology: evidence from analysis in Burkina Faso and Guinea, West Africa," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, October.
    4. Shiyani, R. L. & Joshi, P.K. & Asokan, M. & Bantilan, M.C.S., 2000. "Adoption of Improved Chickpea Varieties: Evidences from Tribal Region of Gujarat," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 55(2), June.
    5. Chand, Ramesh & Birthal, Pratap S., 1997. "Pesticide Use in Indian Agriculture in Relation to Growth in Area and Produciton and Technological Change," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 52(3), September.
    6. Erik Lichtenberg & David Zilberman, 1986. "The Econometrics of Damage Control: Why Specification Matters," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 68(2), pages 261-273.
    7. Feder, Gershon & Just, Richard E & Zilberman, David, 1985. "Adoption of Agricultural Innovations in Developing Countries: A Survey," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 33(2), pages 255-298, January.
    8. Akinwumi A. Adesina & Jojo Baidu‐Forson, 1995. "Farmers' perceptions and adoption of new agricultural technology: evidence from analysis in Burkina Faso and Guinea, West Africa," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, October.
    9. Kevin T. McNamara & Michael E. Wetzstein & G. Keith Douce, 1991. "Factors Affecting Peanut Producer Adoption of Integrated Pest Management," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 13(1), pages 129-139.
    10. White, T Anderson & Runge, C Ford, 1994. "Common Property and Collective Action: Lessons from Cooperative Watershed Management in Haiti," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 43(1), pages 1-41, October.
    11. Ghayur Alam, 1994. "Biotechnology and Sustainable Agriculture: Lessons from India," OECD Development Centre Working Papers 103, OECD Publishing.
    12. Uri Regev & Andrew P. Gutierrez & Gershon Feder, 1976. "Pests as a Common Property Resource: A Case Study of Alfalfa Weevil Control," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 58(2), pages 186-197.
    13. Sarah P. Rook & Gerald A. Carlson, 1985. "Participation in Pest Management Groups," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 67(3), pages 563-566.
    14. Marothia, Dinesh K., 1997. "Agricultural Technology and Environmental Quality: An Institutional Perspective," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 52(3), September.
    15. Ravnborg, Helle Munk & de la Cruz, Ana Milena & del Pilar Guerrero, Maria & Westermann, Olaf, 2000. "Collective action in ant control," CAPRi working papers 7, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    16. Ephraim Nkonya & Ted Schroeder & David Norman, 1997. "Factors Affecting Adoption Of Improved Maize Seed And Fertiliser In Northern Tanzania," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1‐3), pages 1-12, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Saxena, R. & Naveen, P. & Balaji, S.J. & Ahuja, Usha R. & Joshi, Deepika, 2017. "Strategy for Doubling Income of Farmers in India," Policy Papers 345003, ICAR National Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research (NIAP).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Omotuyole Isiaka Ambali & Francisco Jose Areal & Nikolaos Georgantzis, 2021. "Improved Rice Technology Adoption: The Role of Spatially-Dependent Risk Preference," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-13, July.
    2. Ali, Akhter & Hussain, Imtiaz & Rahut, Dil Bahadur & Erenstein, Olaf, 2018. "Laser-land leveling adoption and its impact on water use, crop yields and household income: Empirical evidence from the rice-wheat system of Pakistan Punjab," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 19-32.
    3. Alene, Arega D. & Poonyth, Daneswar & Hassan, Rashid M., 2000. "Determinants of adoption and intensity of use of improved maize varieties in the Central Highlands of Ethiopia: A Tobit analysis," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 39(4), pages 1-11, December.
    4. Varshney, Deepak & Joshi, P.K. & Roy, Devesh & Kumar, Anjani, 2021. "Understanding the Adoption of Modern Cultivars in India: Adoption probability and use intensity," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 47(01), January.
    5. repec:ags:ijag24:345244 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Lim, Krisha & Wichmann, Bruno & Luckert, Martin, 2021. "Adaptation, spatial effects, and targeting: Evidence from Africa and Asia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    7. Rick S. Llewellyn & Brendan Brown, 2020. "Predicting Adoption of Innovations by Farmers: What is Different in Smallholder Agriculture?," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(1), pages 100-112, March.
    8. Aude Ridier & Caroline Roussy & Karim Chaib, 2021. "Adoption of crop diversification by specialized grain farmers in south-western France: evidence from a choice-modelling experiment," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 102(3), pages 265-283, September.
    9. Doan Nainggolan & Faizal Rahmanto Moeis & Mette Termansen, 2023. "Does risk preference influence farm level adaptation strategies? – Survey evidence from Denmark," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 28(7), pages 1-23, October.
    10. Staal, S. J. & Baltenweck, I. & Waithaka, M. M. & deWolff, T. & Njoroge, L., 2002. "Location and uptake: integrated household and GIS analysis of technology adoption and land use, with application to smallholder dairy farms in Kenya," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 295-315, November.
    11. Kenneth, Akankwasa & Gerald, Ortmann & Edilegnaw, Wale & Wilberforce, Tushemereirwe, 2012. "Ex-Ante Adoption of New Cooking Banana (Matooke) Hybrids in Uganda Based on Farmers' Perceptions," 2012 Conference, August 18-24, 2012, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil 123302, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. Arellanes, Peter & Lee, David R., 2003. "The Determinants Of Adoption Of Sustainable Agriculture Technologies: Evidence From The Hillsides Of Honduras," 2003 Annual Meeting, August 16-22, 2003, Durban, South Africa 25826, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. Laxmi, Vijay & Mishra, Vinod, 2007. "Factors Affecting the Adoption of Resource Conservation Technology: Case of Zero Tillage in Rice-Wheat Farming Systems," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 62(01), pages 1-13.
    14. Tushemereirwe, W.K. & Wale, E. & Ortmann, G.F. & Akankwasa, k., 2013. "Farmers’ choice among recently developed hybrid banana varieties in Uganda: A multinomial logit analysis," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 52(2), March.
    15. Srijna Jha & Harald Kaechele & Marcos Lana & T.S Amjath-Babu & Stefan Sieber, 2020. "Exploring Farmers’ Perceptions of Agricultural Technologies: A Case Study from Tanzania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, January.
    16. Thuo, Mary & Bravo-Ureta, Boris E. & Hathie, Ibrahima & Obeng-Asiedu, Patrick, 2011. "Adoption of chemical fertilizer by smallholder farmers in the peanut basin of Senegal," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 6(01), pages 1-17, March.
    17. Carolyn Afolami & Abiodun Obayelu & Ignatius Vaughan, 2015. "Welfare impact of adoption of improved cassava varieties by rural households in South Western Nigeria," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 3(1), pages 1-17, December.
    18. Kisaka-Lwayo, Maggie, 2008. "A Discriminant Analysis of Factors Associated with The Adoption Of Certified Organic Farming By Smallholder Farmers in Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa," 2007 Second International Conference, August 20-22, 2007, Accra, Ghana 52155, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    19. D’Souza, Alwin & Mishra, Ashok K., 2018. "Adoption and Abandonment of Partial Conservation Technologies in Developing Economies: The Case of South Asia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 212-223.
    20. Marra, Michele & Pannell, David J. & Abadi Ghadim, Amir, 2003. "The economics of risk, uncertainty and learning in the adoption of new agricultural technologies: where are we on the learning curve?," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 75(2-3), pages 215-234.
    21. Dilshad Ahmad & Mohammad Afzal & Abdur Rauf, 2021. "Farmers’ adaptation decisions to landslides and flash floods in the mountainous region of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa of Pakistan," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 8573-8600, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:icar24:344974. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dapurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.