IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aare13/152185.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Framing and managing the adoption of practice change for NRM by farmers

Author

Listed:
  • Wright, Vic
  • Keeble, Brigette
  • Kaine, Geoff

Abstract

Public good objectives have, for many years, encouraged governments to target farmers with propositions for change to their production practices. Initially these propositions were attempts to accelerate the adoption of innovations that offered enhanced productivity. They have come to include change designed to enhance environmental stewardship. Coarse or incomplete specification of the costs and benefits of practice change, and of the whole process in which its promotion is embedded, impedes meaningful analysis of likely levels of adoption. In this paper frameworks from marketing and organisational behaviour are applied to a case study to evaluate their possible usefulness to the better framing of adoption decision making.

Suggested Citation

  • Wright, Vic & Keeble, Brigette & Kaine, Geoff, 2013. "Framing and managing the adoption of practice change for NRM by farmers," 2013 Conference (57th), February 5-8, 2013, Sydney, Australia 152185, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aare13:152185
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.152185
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/152185/files/CP%20Wright.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.152185?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Phillips, John, 1968. "A Revised Approach to Marketing," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 36(01), pages 1-9, March.
    2. Mullen, John D. & Vernon, Don & Fishpool, Ken I., 2000. "Agricultural extension policy in Australia: public funding and market failure," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 44(4), pages 1-17.
    3. Kaine, Geoff & Lees, Jim & Wright, Vic, 2007. "An Approach to Predicting Demand for an Agricultural Innovation," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 15.
    4. Jackie Coyle‐Shapiro & Ian Kessler, 2000. "Consequences Of The Psychological Contract For The Employment Relationship: A Large Scale Survey," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(7), pages 903-930, November.
    5. Gregory F. Hayden, 1988. "Values, Beliefs, and Attitudes in a Sociotechnical Setting," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 415-426, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Protsiuk Olga, 2019. "The Relationships Between Psychological Contract Expectations and Counterproductive Work Behaviors: Employer Perception," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 27(3), pages 85-106, September.
    2. Sturgess, Ian M., 1968. "The Wool Board'S Second Report On Marketing: A Review Article," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Chih-Ting Shih & Cheng-Chen Lin, 2014. "From good friends to good soldiers: A psychological contract perspective," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 309-326, March.
    4. Kraak, Johannes Marcelus & Lunardo, Renaud & Herrbach, Olivier & Durrieu, François, 2017. "Promises to employees matter, self-identity too: Effects of psychological contract breach and older worker identity on violation and turnover intentions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 108-117.
    5. Thomas Zagenczyk & Ray Gibney & W. Few & Kristin Scott, 2011. "Psychological Contracts and Organizational Identification: The Mediating Effect of Perceived Organizational Support," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 254-281, September.
    6. Sally Sambrook & Delia Wainwright, 2010. "The Psychological Contract: Who's Contracting with Whom? Towards a Conceptual Model," Working Papers 10013, Bangor Business School, Prifysgol Bangor University (Cymru / Wales).
    7. James Kwame Mensah, 2019. "Talent Management and Employee Outcomes: A Psychological Contract Fulfilment Perspective," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 325-344, September.
    8. Chieh-Peng Lin & Chou-Kang Chiu & Na-Ting Liu, 2019. "Developing virtual team performance: an integrated perspective of social exchange and social cognitive theories," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 671-688, August.
    9. Kenneth de Roeck & Nicolas Raineri & David Jones & Sabrina Scheidler, 2024. "Giving the benefit of the doubt: Investigating the insurance-like effect of CSR in mitigating negative employee reactions to psychological contract breach," Post-Print hal-04238140, HAL.
    10. Michael White & Alex Bryson, 2018. "HPWS in the Public Sector: Are There Mutual Gains?," DoQSS Working Papers 18-10, Quantitative Social Science - UCL Social Research Institute, University College London.
    11. Anna ROGOZIÑSKA-PAWE£CZYK, 2015. "The Dynamic Character of a Psychological Contract between the Superior and the Employee (According to Empirical Research)," Economia. Seria Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 18(2), pages 271-284, December.
    12. Yoshiko DeMotta & Sankar Sen, 2017. "How psychological contracts motivate employer-brand patronage," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 385-395, September.
    13. repec:iim:iimawp:13106 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Shaiful Annuar Khalid & Hassan Ali & Mohammad Ismail & Norshimah Abdul Rahman & Kamsol Mohamed Kassim & Rozihana Shekh Zain, 2009. "Organizational Citizenship Behavior Factor Structure among Employees in Hotel Industry," International Journal of Psychological Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 1(1), pages 1-16, June.
    15. Heffernan Margaret & Rochford Eoin, 2017. "Psychological contract breach and turnover intention: the moderating effects of social status and local ties," The Irish Journal of Management, Sciendo, vol. 36(2), pages 99-115.
    16. Cam Caldwell, 2011. "Duties Owed to Organizational Citizens – Ethical Insights for Today’s Leader," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 102(3), pages 343-356, September.
    17. Gregory S. Dawson & Elena Karahanna & Ann Buchholtz, 2014. "A Study of Psychological Contract Breach Spillover in Multiple-Agency Relationships in Consulting Professional Service Firms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 149-170, February.
    18. Ming-Chuan Yu & Qiang Mai & Sang-Bing Tsai & Yi Dai, 2018. "An Empirical Study on the Organizational Trust, Employee-Organization Relationship and Innovative Behavior from the Integrated Perspective of Social Exchange and Organizational Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-14, March.
    19. Cong Feng & Scott Fay & Kexin Xiang, 2021. "When do we need higher educated salespeople? The role of work experience," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(5), pages 1391-1429, July.
    20. Bera Agata, 2021. "In Search of Outcomes of a Psychological Contract in Public Organisation," International Journal of Contemporary Management, Sciendo, vol. 57(2), pages 9-18, June.
    21. White, Michael & Bryson, Alex, 2019. "The Impact of High-Performance Work Systems on Employees: A Sectoral Comparison," IZA Discussion Papers 12527, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Farm Management; Public Economics;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aare13:152185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaresea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.