IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/psc506.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Pia Sophia Schober

Personal Details

First Name:Pia
Middle Name:Sophia
Last Name:Schober
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:psc506
http://piaschober.net

Affiliation

(90%) Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Institut für Soziologie (University of Tuebingen, Department of Sociology)

https://www.uni-tuebingen.de/en/faculties/economics-and-social-sciences/subjects/department-of-sociology/department/about-our-department.html
Germany, Tuebingen

(10%) DIW Berlin (Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung)

Berlin, Germany
http://www.diw.de/
RePEc:edi:diwbede (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles

Working papers

  1. Pia S. Schober & Gundula Zoch, 2015. "Change in the Gender Division of Domestic Work after Mummy or Daddy Took Leave: An Examination of Alternative Explanations," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 803, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
  2. Pia S. Schober, 2015. "Increasing Father Involvement in Child Care: What Do We Know about Effects on Child Development?," DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus 79, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  3. Pia S. Schober & C. Katharina Spieß, 2014. "Local Day-Care Quality and Maternal Employment: Evidence from East and West Germany," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 649, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
  4. Frauke H. Peter & Pia S. Schober & C. Katharina Spieß, 2014. "Early Birds in Day Care: The Social Gradient in Starting Day Care and Children's Non-cognitive Skills," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1438, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  5. Pia S. Schober, 2014. "Daddy Leave: Does It Change the Gender Division of Domestic Work?," DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus 46, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  6. Pia S. Schober & Christian Schmitt, 2013. "Day-Care Expansion and Parental Subjective Well-Being: Evidence from Germany," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 602, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
  7. Pia S. Schober, 2012. "Parental Leave Policies and Child Care Time in Couples after Childbirth," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 434, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
  8. Pia S. Schober, 2011. "Maternal Labor Market Return, Parental Leave Policies, and Gender Inequality in Housework," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 422, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).

Articles

  1. Juliane F. Stahl & Pia S. Schober, 2016. "Ausbau der ganztägigen Kindertagesbetreuung kann zur Zufriedenheit von Müttern beitragen," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 83(37), pages 840-847.
  2. Georg F. Camehl & Juliane F. Stahl & Pia S. Schober & C. Katharina Spieß, 2015. "Höhere Qualität und geringere Kosten von Kindertageseinrichtungen – zufriedenere Eltern?," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 82(46), pages 1105-1113.
  3. Georg F. Camehl & Juliane F. Stahl & Pia S. Schober & C. Katharina Spieß, 2015. "Does Better, Cheaper Day Care Make for More Satisfied Parents?," DIW Economic Bulletin, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 5(45/46), pages 604-611.
  4. Pia S. Schober & Gundula Zoch, 2015. "Kürzere Elternzeit von Müttern: gleichmäßigere Aufteilung der Familienarbeit?," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 82(50), pages 1190-1196.
  5. Karl Brenke & Marcel Fratzscher & Markus M. Grabka & Elke Holst & Sebastian Hülle & Stefan Liebig & Maximilian Priem & Anika Rasner & Pia S. Schober & Jürgen Schupp & Juliane F. Stahl & Anna Wieber, 2014. "Die Wiedervereinigung: eine ökonomische Erfolgsgeschichte," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 81(40), pages 935-937.
  6. Karl Brenke & Marcel Fratzscher & Markus M. Grabka & Elke Holst & Sebastian Hülle & Stefan Liebig & Maximilian Priem & Anika Rasner & Pia S. Schober & Jürgen Schupp & Juliane F. Stahl & Anna Wieber, 2014. "Reunification: An Economic Success Story," DIW Economic Bulletin, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 4(11), pages 3-5.
  7. Pia S. Schober & Juliane F. Stahl, 2014. "Childcare Trends in Germany: Increasing Socio-Economic Disparities in East and West," DIW Economic Bulletin, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 4(11), pages 51-58.
  8. Pia Schober, 2014. "Kinderbetreuungspolitik ist auch Bildungspolitik, nicht nur Arbeitsmarktpolitik: Kommentar," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 81(33), pages 780-780.
  9. Pia S. Schober & C. Katharina Spieß, 2014. "Die Kita-Qualität ist für das Erwerbsverhalten von Müttern mit Kleinkindern relevant: Zusammenhang eindeutiger in Ostdeutschland," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 81(21), pages 463-471.
  10. Pia S. Schober & Juliane F. Stahl, 2014. "Trends in der Kinderbetreuung: sozioökonomische Unterschiede verstärken sich in Ost und West," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 81(40), pages 986-994.
  11. Pia S. Schober & Christian Schmitt, 2013. "Ausbau der Kinderbetreuung: Entlastung der Eltern erhöht Zufriedenheit," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 80(50), pages 3-11.
  12. Schober, Pia S., 2013. "Gender Equality and Outsourcing of Domestic Work, Childbearing, and Relationship Stability Among British Couples," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 34(1), pages 25-52.
  13. Pia Schober & Jacqueline Scott, 2012. "Maternal employment and gender role attitudes: dissonance among British men and women in the transition to parenthood," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 26(3), pages 514-530, June.
  14. Pia S. Schober & C. Katharina Spieß, 2012. "Frühe Förderung und Betreuung von Kindern: bedeutende Unterschiede bei der Inanspruchnahme besonders in den ersten Lebensjahren," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 79(43), pages 17-28.
  15. Pia S. Schober, 2012. "Social Policies, Labour Markets and Motherhood . Edited by Daniela Del Boca and Cécile Wetzels . 2007 . Cambridge University Press , Cambridge . 336 pp. £65.00," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 79(314), pages 418-419, April.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Pia S. Schober & Gundula Zoch, 2015. "Change in the Gender Division of Domestic Work after Mummy or Daddy Took Leave: An Examination of Alternative Explanations," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 803, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).

    Cited by:

    1. Tamm, Marcus, 2018. "Fathers' Parental Leave-Taking, Childcare Involvement and Mothers' Labor Market Participation," IZA Discussion Papers 11873, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Claire Samtleben & Julia Bringmann & Mareike Bünning & Lena Hipp, 2019. "What Helps and What Hinders? Exploring the Role of Workplace Characteristics for Parental Leave Use and Its Career Consequences," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-30, September.
    3. Brindusa Anghel & J. Ignacio Conde-Ruiz & Ignacio Marra de Artíñano, 2019. "Brechas Salariales de Género en España," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 229(2), pages 87-119, June.
    4. Bünning, Mareike, 2020. "Paternal Part-Time Employment and Fathers' Long-Term Involvement in Child Care and Housework," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 82(2), pages 566-586.

  2. Pia S. Schober & C. Katharina Spieß, 2014. "Local Day-Care Quality and Maternal Employment: Evidence from East and West Germany," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 649, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).

    Cited by:

    1. Kai-Uwe Müller & Katharina Wrohlich, 2018. "Does Subsidized Care for Toddlers Increase Maternal Labor Supply?: Evidence from a Large-Scale Expansion of Early Childcare," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1747, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    2. Stefan Bach & Jonas Jessen & Peter Haan & Frauke Peter & C. Katharina Spieß & Katharina Wrohlich & unter Mitwirkung von Niklas Isaak & Louisanne Knierim & Elena Ziege & Jan Marcus, 2020. "Fiskalische Wirkungen eines weiteren Ausbaus ganztägiger Betreuungsangebote für Kinder im Grundschulalter: Gutachten für das Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend," DIW Berlin: Politikberatung kompakt, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, volume 127, number pbk146.
    3. Hofmann, Barbara & Kreyenfeld, Michaela & Uhlendorff, Arne, 2017. "Job Displacement and First Birth over the Business Cycle," IZA Discussion Papers 10485, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    4. Ludovica Gambaro & Jan Marcus & Frauke Peter, 2019. "School entry, afternoon care, and mothers’ labour supply," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 769-803, September.
    5. Boll, Christina & Lagemann, Andreas, 2017. "Public childcare and maternal labour supply: New evidence for Germany," HWWI Research Papers 180, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWI).
    6. Zierow, Larissa, 2017. "Regulating Child Care Markets. Center-based Care vs. Family Day-Care in Germany," VfS Annual Conference 2017 (Vienna): Alternative Structures for Money and Banking 168052, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    7. Kasrin, Zein & Smolny, Werner, 2019. "Female Labor Market Participation and Socioeconomic Development: Disentangling the U-Shaped Hypothesis," MPRA Paper 95561, University Library of Munich, Germany.

  3. Frauke H. Peter & Pia S. Schober & C. Katharina Spieß, 2014. "Early Birds in Day Care: The Social Gradient in Starting Day Care and Children's Non-cognitive Skills," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1438, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Mara Barschkett, 2022. "Age-specific Effects of Early Daycare on Children's Health," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 2028, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    2. Malte Sandner & Stephan L. Thomsen, 2018. "The Effects of Universal Public Childcare Provision on Cases of Child Neglect and Abuse," Working Papers 2018-051, Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Working Group.
    3. Mara Barschkett & C. Katharina Spiess & Elena Ziege, 2021. "Does Grandparenting Pay off for the Next Generations? Intergenerational Effects of Grandparental Care," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 1152, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    4. Peter, Frauke H. & Spieß, C. Katharina, 2016. "Family Instability and Locus of Control in Adolescence," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 16(3), pages 1439-1471.
    5. Maximilian Bach & Josefine Koebe & Frauke H. Peter, 2019. "Long Run Effects of Universal Childcare on Personality Traits," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1815, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    6. Sandner, Malte & Thomsen, Stephan L., 2020. "Preventing Child Maltreatment: Beneficial Side Effects of Public Childcare Provision," Hannover Economic Papers (HEP) dp-669, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät.
    7. Georg F. Camehl & C. Katharina Spieß & Kurt Hahlweg, 2019. "Short- and Mid-Term Effects of a Parenting Program on Maternal Well-Being: Evidence for More and Less Advantaged Mothers," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 1062, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    8. Daniela Del Boca & Enrica Maria Martino & Chiara Pronzato, 2017. "Early Childcare and Child Non-Cognitive Outcomes," CHILD Working Papers Series 58 JEL Classification: J1, Centre for Household, Income, Labour and Demographic Economics (CHILD) - CCA.
    9. Camehl, Georg & Hahlweg, Kurt & Spieß, C. Katharina, 2018. "The Effects of a Parenting Program on Maternal Well-Being: Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial," VfS Annual Conference 2018 (Freiburg, Breisgau): Digital Economy 181583, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    10. Mara Barschkett, 2022. "Age-specific Effects of Early Daycare on Children’s Health," Berlin School of Economics Discussion Papers 0005, Berlin School of Economics.
    11. Barschkett, Mara, 2023. "Age-specific Effects of Early Daycare on Children's Health," VfS Annual Conference 2023 (Regensburg): Growth and the "sociale Frage" 277588, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.

  4. Pia S. Schober, 2014. "Daddy Leave: Does It Change the Gender Division of Domestic Work?," DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus 46, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Johannes Geyer & Alexandra Krause, 2016. "Veränderungen der Erwerbsanreize durch das Elterngeld Plus für Mütter und Väter," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1592, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    2. Pia S. Schober, 2015. "Increasing Father Involvement in Child Care: What Do We Know about Effects on Child Development?," DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus 79, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

  5. Pia S. Schober & Christian Schmitt, 2013. "Day-Care Expansion and Parental Subjective Well-Being: Evidence from Germany," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 602, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).

    Cited by:

    1. Verena Lauber & Johanna Storck, 2016. "Helping with the Kids? How Family-Friendly Workplaces Affect Parental Well-Being and Behavior," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 883, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    2. Verena Lauber & Johanna Storck, 2016. "Helping with the Kids? How Family-Friendly Workplaces Affect Parental Well-Being and Behavior," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1630, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    3. Xiumin Hong & Jingyuan Wang & Wenting Zhu, 2022. "The Relationship between Childcare Services Participation and Parental Subjective Well-Being under China’s Three-Child Policy—Based on the Mediation Effect of Parenting Stress," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Hong, Kai & Dragan, Kacie & Glied, Sherry, 2019. "Seeing and hearing: The impacts of New York City’s universal pre-kindergarten program on the health of low-income children," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 93-107.
    5. Marie Connolly & Catherine Haeck, 2015. "Are Childcare Subsidies Good for Parental Well-being? Empirical Evidence from Three Countries," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 13(01), pages 09-15, April.
    6. Anna Matysiak & Dorota Wêziak-Bia³owolska, 2013. "Country-Specific Conditions for Work and Family Reconciliation: An Attempt at Quantification," Working Papers 67, Institute of Statistics and Demography, Warsaw School of Economics.

  6. Pia S. Schober, 2012. "Parental Leave Policies and Child Care Time in Couples after Childbirth," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 434, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).

    Cited by:

    1. Christina Boll & Julian Leppin & Nora Reich, 2014. "Paternal childcare and parental leave policies: evidence from industrialized countries," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 129-158, March.
    2. Tyrowicz, Joanna & van der Velde, Lucas & van Staveren, Irene, 2018. "Identifying Age Penalty in Women's Wages: New Method and Evidence from Germany 1984-2014," IZA Discussion Papers 11295, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. George Argyrous & Lyn Craig & Sara Rahman, 2017. "The Effect of a First Born Child on Work and Childcare Time Allocation: Pre-post Analysis of Australian Couples," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 131(2), pages 831-851, March.
    4. Joanna Tyrowicz & Lucas van der Velde & Irene van Staveren, 2015. "Differences in the Estimates of Gender Wage Gap Over The Life Cycle," Working Papers 2015-29, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.

  7. Pia S. Schober, 2011. "Maternal Labor Market Return, Parental Leave Policies, and Gender Inequality in Housework," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 422, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).

    Cited by:

    1. Geyer, Johannes & Haan, Peter & Spieß, C. Katharina & Wrohlich, Katharina, 2013. "Das Elterngeld und seine Wirkungen auf das Haushaltseinkommen junger Familien und die Erwerbstätigkeit von Müttern," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 25(2), pages 193-211.
    2. Pia S. Schober, 2012. "Parental Leave Policies and Child Care Time in Couples after Childbirth," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 434, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).

Articles

  1. Georg F. Camehl & Juliane F. Stahl & Pia S. Schober & C. Katharina Spieß, 2015. "Höhere Qualität und geringere Kosten von Kindertageseinrichtungen – zufriedenere Eltern?," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 82(46), pages 1105-1113.

    Cited by:

    1. Georg F. Camehl & Pia S. Schober & C. Katharina Spiess, 2018. "Information asymmetries between parents and educators in German childcare institutions," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(6), pages 624-646, November.
    2. Bartels, Charlotte & Stockhausen, Maximilian, 2016. "Children's opportunities in Germany: An application using multidimensional measures," Discussion Papers 2016/1, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.

  2. Georg F. Camehl & Juliane F. Stahl & Pia S. Schober & C. Katharina Spieß, 2015. "Does Better, Cheaper Day Care Make for More Satisfied Parents?," DIW Economic Bulletin, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 5(45/46), pages 604-611.

    Cited by:

    1. Georg F. Camehl & Pia S. Schober & C. Katharina Spiess, 2018. "Information asymmetries between parents and educators in German childcare institutions," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(6), pages 624-646, November.
    2. Jessen, Jonas & Spieß, C. Katharina & Waights, Sevrin, 2021. "Center-Based Care and Parenting Activities," IZA Discussion Papers 14851, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Spieß C. Katharina & Schober Pia S. & Stahl Juliane F., 2020. "Early Childhood Education and Care Quality in the Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) – the KID-SOEP Study," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 240(1), pages 111-120, January.
    4. Huebener, Mathias & Pape, Astrid & Spieß, C. Katharina, 2019. "Parental Labour Supply Responses to the Abolition of Day Care Fees," IZA Discussion Papers 12780, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

  3. Pia S. Schober & Juliane F. Stahl, 2014. "Childcare Trends in Germany: Increasing Socio-Economic Disparities in East and West," DIW Economic Bulletin, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 4(11), pages 51-58.

    Cited by:

    1. Pietropoli, Ilaria & Triventi, Moris, 2023. "What drives early childhood education attendance? The role of structural factors and personal beliefs in Germany," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    2. Maryam Dilmaghani & Vurain Tabvuma, 2022. "Fragile Families in Quebec and the Rest of Canada: A Comparison of Parental Work-Life Balance Satisfaction," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 41(2), pages 695-728, April.
    3. Pia S. Schober & Gundula Zoch, 2015. "Change in the Gender Division of Domestic Work after Mummy or Daddy Took Leave: An Examination of Alternative Explanations," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 803, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    4. Ezgi Caki, 2022. "The Plight of Female Employment in Germany under School-Related COVID-19 Control Measures," The CoronaNet Researchers Working Paper Series 04/2022, CoronaNet Research Project, revised Jun 2022.

  4. Pia S. Schober & C. Katharina Spieß, 2014. "Die Kita-Qualität ist für das Erwerbsverhalten von Müttern mit Kleinkindern relevant: Zusammenhang eindeutiger in Ostdeutschland," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 81(21), pages 463-471.

    Cited by:

    1. Bachmann, Ronald & Felder, Rahel & Tamm, Marcus, 2018. "Labour Market Participation and Atypical Employment over the Life Cycle: A Cohort Analysis for Germany," IZA Discussion Papers 12010, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Juliane F. Stahl, 2015. "Wer nutzt welche Qualität? Zusammenhänge zwischen sozioökonomischer Herkunft und Kita-Qualität," DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus 73, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

  5. Pia S. Schober & Juliane F. Stahl, 2014. "Trends in der Kinderbetreuung: sozioökonomische Unterschiede verstärken sich in Ost und West," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 81(40), pages 986-994.

    Cited by:

    1. Jirjahn, Uwe & Struewing, Cornelia, 2019. "Out-of-Partnership Births in East and West Germany," GLO Discussion Paper Series 337, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    2. Peter Eibich & Thomas Siedler, 2020. "Retirement, Intergenerational Time Transfers, and Fertility," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 1073, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    3. Stockhausen, Maximilian, 2017. "The distribution of economic resources to children in Germany," Discussion Papers 2017/7, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    4. Christina Boll & Andreas Lagemann, 2018. "Does Culture Trump Money? Employment and Childcare Use of Migrant and Non-Migrant Mothers of Pre-School Children in Germany," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 1015, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    5. Thomas Cornelissen & Christian Dustmann & Anna Raute & Uta Schönberg, 2018. "Who benefits from universal child care? Estimating marginal returns to early child care attendance," RF Berlin - CReAM Discussion Paper Series 1808, Rockwool Foundation Berlin (RF Berlin) - Centre for Research and Analysis of Migration (CReAM).
    6. Boll, Christina & Lagemann, Andreas, 2018. "Does Culture Trump Money? Erwerbsverhalten und Kitanutzung von Müttern mit und ohne Migrationshintergrund in Deutschland," HWWI Research Papers 188, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWI).
    7. Uwe Jirjahn, Cornelia Struewing, 2018. "Single Motherhood in East and West Germany: What Can Explain the Differences?," European Journal of Comparative Economics, Cattaneo University (LIUC), vol. 15(2), pages 197-229, December.
    8. Boll, Christina & Lagemann, Andreas, 2018. "Das Erwerbsverhalten von Eltern mit Migrationshintergrund: SOEP-basierte Befunde und deren Implikationen für Hamburg," HWWI Policy Papers 112, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWI).
    9. Stockhausen, Maximilian, 2016. "The Impact of Private and Public Childcare Provision on the Distribution of Children's Incomes in Germany," VfS Annual Conference 2016 (Augsburg): Demographic Change 145638, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    10. Bönke, Timm & Harnack, Astrid & Wetter, Miriam, 2019. "Wer gewinnt? Wer verliert? Die Entwicklung auf dem deutschen Arbeitsmarkt seit den frühen Jahren der Bundesrepublik bis heute," Discussion Papers 2019/4, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    11. Bartels, Charlotte & Stockhausen, Maximilian, 2016. "Children's opportunities in Germany: An application using multidimensional measures," Discussion Papers 2016/1, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    12. Juliane F. Stahl, 2015. "Wer nutzt welche Qualität? Zusammenhänge zwischen sozioökonomischer Herkunft und Kita-Qualität," DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus 73, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

  6. Schober, Pia S., 2013. "Gender Equality and Outsourcing of Domestic Work, Childbearing, and Relationship Stability Among British Couples," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 34(1), pages 25-52.

    Cited by:

    1. Liat Raz-Yurovich, 2016. "Outsourcing of Housework and the Transition to a Second Birth in Germany," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 35(3), pages 401-417, June.
    2. Katherine Twamley & Charlotte Faircloth, 2015. "Introduction to Special Section Gender, Intimacy, Equality: (Un)comfortable Bedfellows?," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 20(4), pages 119-122, November.
    3. Hudde, Ansgar, 2016. "Fertility Is Low When There Is No Societal Agreement on a Specific Gender Role Model," EconStor Preprints 142175, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    4. Martin Boďa & Mariana Považanová & Gabriela Nedelová & Anna Vallušová, 2024. "Gendered Division of Housework in Slovak Couples: Life Course and Other Factors," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 649-671, September.
    5. Jingyue Zhang & Yipeng Tian, 2019. "Housework Division and Second-Child Fertility Anxiety among Couples in China: The Urban and Rural Differences," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-14, October.
    6. Pia S. Schober & Gundula Zoch, 2015. "Change in the Gender Division of Domestic Work after Mummy or Daddy Took Leave: An Examination of Alternative Explanations," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 803, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    7. Marta Regina Cezar-Vaz & Clarice Alves Bonow & Mara Regina Santos Da Silva, 2015. "Mental and Physical Symptoms of Female Rural Workers: Relation between Household and Rural Work," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-13, September.
    8. Liat Raz-Yurovich, 2012. "Normative and allocation role strain: role incompatibility, outsourcing, and the transition to a second birth in Eastern and Western Germany," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2012-024, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.

  7. Pia Schober & Jacqueline Scott, 2012. "Maternal employment and gender role attitudes: dissonance among British men and women in the transition to parenthood," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 26(3), pages 514-530, June.

    Cited by:

    1. Lucas van der Velde, 2022. "Changes in attitudes towards gender norms following childbirth," Working Papers 397, Leibniz Institut für Ost- und Südosteuropaforschung (Institute for East and Southeast European Studies).
    2. Ye Liu, 2023. "As the Two-Child Policy Beckons: Work–Family Conflicts, Gender Strategies and Self-Worth among Women from the First One-Child Generation in Contemporary China," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 37(1), pages 20-38, February.
    3. Matteo Migheli, 2021. "Green purchasing: the effect of parenthood and gender," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(7), pages 10576-10600, July.
    4. Torsten Lietzmann & Corinna Frodermann, 2023. "Gender Role Attitudes and Labour Market Behaviours: Do Attitudes Contribute to Gender Differences in Employment in Germany?," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 37(2), pages 373-393, April.
    5. Karon Gush & James Scott & Heather Laurie, 2015. "Households’ responses to spousal job loss: ‘all change’ or ‘carry on as usual’?," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 29(5), pages 703-719, October.
    6. Cavapozzi, Danilo & Francesconi, Marco & Nicoletti, Cheti, 2021. "The Impact of Gender Role Norms on Mothers' Labor Supply," IZA Discussion Papers 14219, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    7. Pia S. Schober, 2014. "Daddy Leave: Does It Change the Gender Division of Domestic Work?," DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus 46, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    8. Sarah N Flèche & Anthony Lepinteur & Nattavudh Powdthavee, 2020. "Gender norms, fairness and relative working hours within households," Post-Print hal-03139138, HAL.
    9. Elena Grinza & Francesco Devicienti & Mariacristina Rossi & Davide Vannoni, 2017. "How Entry into Parenthood Shapes Gender Role Attitudes: New Evidence from Longitudinal UK Data," Working papers 042, Department of Economics, Social Studies, Applied Mathematics and Statistics (Dipartimento di Scienze Economico-Sociali e Matematico-Statistiche), University of Torino.
    10. Mireia Borrell-Porta & Joan Costa-Font & Julia Philipp, 2019. "The ‘mighty girl’ effect: does parenting daughters alter attitudes towards gender norms?," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 71(1), pages 25-46.
    11. Platt, Lucinda & Polavieja, Javier, 2016. "Saying and doing gender: intergenerational transmission of attitudes towards the sexual division of labour," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 67302, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. J. Ignacio Gimenez-Nadal & José Alberto Molina & Yu Zhu, 2018. "Intergenerational mobility of housework time in the United Kingdom," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 911-937, December.
    13. Francesconi, Marco & Nicoletti, Cheti & Cavapozzi, Danilo, 2021. "The Impact of Gender Role Norms on Mothers’ Labor Supply," CEPR Discussion Papers 15957, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    14. Juliane Frederike Stahl & Pia Sophia Schober, 2018. "Convergence or Divergence? Educational Discrepancies in Work-Care Arrangements of Mothers with Young Children in Germany," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 32(4), pages 629-649, August.
    15. Gundula Zoch, 2023. "Participation in Job-Related Training: Is There a Parenthood Training Penalty?," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 37(1), pages 274-292, February.
    16. Pia S. Schober & Gundula Zoch, 2015. "Change in the Gender Division of Domestic Work after Mummy or Daddy Took Leave: An Examination of Alternative Explanations," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 803, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    17. Leen Vandecasteele & Katya Ivanova & Inge Sieben & Tim Reeskens, 2022. "Changing attitudes about the impact of women's employment on families: The COVID‐19 pandemic effect," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2012-2033, November.
    18. Julie Maes & Jonas Wood & Karel Neels, 2023. "Path-Dependencies in Employment Trajectories Around Motherhood: Comparing Native Versus Second-Generation Migrant Women in Belgium," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 281-344, March.
    19. Katia Begall & Nicole Hiekel, 2024. "Beyond the continuum: a micro-level analysis of the gender equality-fertility nexus in three Nordic countries," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2024-004, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    20. Gusta G. Wachter & Helga A. G. Valk, 2022. "Cohort Succession in the Timing of Marriage Among the Children of Turkish and Moroccan Immigrants," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 38(3), pages 485-516, August.
    21. Pia S. Schober & C. Katharina Spieß, 2014. "Local Day-Care Quality and Maternal Employment: Evidence from East and West Germany," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 649, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    22. Carly van Mensvoort & Gerbert Kraaykamp & Roza Meuleman & Marieke van den Brink, 2021. "A Cross-Country Comparison of Gender Traditionalism in Business Leadership: How Supportive Are Female Supervisors?," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 35(4), pages 793-814, August.
    23. Mireia Borrell-Porta & Valentina Contreras & Joan Costa-i-Font, 2021. "Is 'Employment during Motherhood' a 'Value Changing Experience'?," CESifo Working Paper Series 9222, CESifo.
    24. Vidal, Sergi & Lersch, Philipp M., 2019. "Changes in gender role attitudes following couples' residential relocations," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 0(39), pages 1111-1152.
    25. Hannah Zagel, 2015. "Understanding Differences in Labour Market Attachment of Single Mothers in Great Britain and West Germany," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 773, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    26. He, Jun & Xie, Yongxiang, 2022. "The sociocultural mechanism of obesity: The influence of gender role attitudes on obesity and the gender gap," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    27. Simonetta Longhi & Alita Nandi & Mark Bryan & Sara Connolly & Cigdem Gedikli, 2018. "Unhappiness in unemployment – is it the same for everyone?," Working Papers 2018007, The University of Sheffield, Department of Economics.
    28. Zagel, Hannah, 2015. "Understanding differences in labour market attachment of single mothers in Great Britain and West Germany," Working papers of the ZeS 03/2015, University of Bremen, Centre for Social Policy Research (ZeS).
    29. Chris K Deak & Matthew D Hammond & Chris G Sibley & Joseph Bulbulia, 2021. "Individuals’ number of children is associated with benevolent sexism," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-16, May.

  8. Pia S. Schober & C. Katharina Spieß, 2012. "Frühe Förderung und Betreuung von Kindern: bedeutende Unterschiede bei der Inanspruchnahme besonders in den ersten Lebensjahren," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 79(43), pages 17-28.

    Cited by:

    1. Christina Boll & Andreas Lagemann, 2018. "Does Culture Trump Money? Employment and Childcare Use of Migrant and Non-Migrant Mothers of Pre-School Children in Germany," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 1015, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    2. Boll, Christina & Lagemann, Andreas, 2018. "Does Culture Trump Money? Erwerbsverhalten und Kitanutzung von Müttern mit und ohne Migrationshintergrund in Deutschland," HWWI Research Papers 188, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWI).
    3. Holger Bonin & Anita Fichtl & Helmut Rainer & C. Katharina Spieß & Holger Stichnoth & Katharina Wrohlich, 2013. "Zentrale Resultate der Gesamtevaluation familienbezogener Leistungen," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 80(40), pages 3-13.
    4. Boll, Christina & Lagemann, Andreas, 2018. "Das Erwerbsverhalten von Eltern mit Migrationshintergrund: SOEP-basierte Befunde und deren Implikationen für Hamburg," HWWI Policy Papers 112, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWI).
    5. Juliane F. Stahl, 2015. "Wer nutzt welche Qualität? Zusammenhänge zwischen sozioökonomischer Herkunft und Kita-Qualität," DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus 73, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    6. Holger Bonin & Anita Fichtl & Helmut Rainer & C. Katharina Spieß & Holger Stichnoth & Katharina Wrohlich & Anita Dietrich, 2013. "Lehren für die Familienpolitik – Zentrale Resultate der Gesamtevaluation familienbezogener Leistungen," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 66(18), pages 22-30, October.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 7 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-EUR: Microeconomic European Issues (5) 2012-01-18 2012-03-21 2013-11-16 2015-01-31 2015-11-21. Author is listed
  2. NEP-DEM: Demographic Economics (4) 2012-01-18 2012-03-21 2015-10-04 2015-11-21
  3. NEP-LAB: Labour Economics (3) 2012-01-18 2012-03-21 2014-07-05
  4. NEP-EDU: Education (1) 2015-01-31
  5. NEP-HAP: Economics of Happiness (1) 2013-11-16
  6. NEP-HME: Heterodox Microeconomics (1) 2012-01-18
  7. NEP-LTV: Unemployment, Inequality and Poverty (1) 2013-11-16

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Pia Sophia Schober should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.