IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/pro759.html
   My authors  Follow this author

David Rojo Arjona

Personal Details

First Name:David
Middle Name:
Last Name:Rojo Arjona
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pro759
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]
https://sites.google.com/site/rojoarjona/

Affiliation

School of Business
Leicester University

Leicester, United Kingdom
https://le.ac.uk/school-of-business
RePEc:edi:deleiuk (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles

Working papers

  1. Gabriele Camera & Jaehong Kim & David Rojo Arjona, 2023. "Choice Flexibility and Long-Run Cooperation," Working Papers 23-05, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
  2. David Rojo-Arjona & R. Stefania Sitzia & Jiwei Zheng, 2021. "Overcoming coordination failure in games with focal points: An experimental investigation," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Science (CBESS) 21-02, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
  3. Dan Kovenock & David Rojo Arjona, 2019. "A Full Characterization of Best-Response Functions in the Lottery Colonel Blotto Game," Working Papers 19-05, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
  4. van Leeuwen, Boris & Ramalingam, Abhijit & Rojo Arjona, David & Schram, Arthur, 2019. "Centrality and cooperation in networks," Other publications TiSEM b668e3a4-b5a5-49f0-a7fe-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
  5. Subhasish M. Chowdhury & Dan Kovenock & David Rojo Arjona & Nathaniel T. Wilcox, 2016. "Focality and Asymmetry in Multi-battle Contests," Working Papers 16-16, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
  6. Shaun Hargreaves Heap & Abhijit Ramalingam & David Rojo Arjona, 2015. "Social information 'nudges': An experiment with multiple group references," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Science (CBESS) 15-02, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
  7. Ramalingam, Abhijit & Rojo Arjona, David & Schram, Arthur & Van Leeuwen, Boris, 2015. "Authority and Centrality: Power and Cooperation in Social Dilemma Networks," IAST Working Papers 15-23, Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse (IAST).
  8. Shaun Hargreaves Heap & David Rojo Arjona & Robert Sugden, 2012. "A Popperian test of level-k theory," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Science (CBESS) 12-06, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..

Articles

  1. Rojo Arjona, David & Sitzia, Stefania & Zheng, Jiwei, 2022. "Overcoming coordination failure in games with focal points: An experimental investigation," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 505-523.
  2. Subhasish M Chowdhury & Dan Kovenock & David Rojo Arjona & Nathaniel T Wilcox, 2021. "Focality and Asymmetry in Multi-Battle Contests," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 131(636), pages 1593-1619.
  3. Boris Leeuwen & Abhijit Ramalingam & David Rojo Arjona & Arthur Schram, 2019. "Centrality and cooperation in networks," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 22(1), pages 178-196, March.
  4. Kovenock, Dan & Rojo Arjona, David, 2019. "A full characterization of best-response functions in the lottery Colonel Blotto game," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 33-36.
  5. Fatas, Enrique & Hargreaves Heap, Shaun P. & Rojo Arjona, David, 2018. "Preference conformism: An experiment," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 71-82.
  6. Shaun P. Hargreaves Heap & David Rojo Arjona & Robert Sugden, 2017. "Coordination when there are restricted and unrestricted options," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 83(1), pages 107-129, June.
  7. Shaun Hargreaves Heap & Abhijit Ramalingam & David Rojo Arjona, 2017. "Social Information “Nudges”: An Experiment with Multiple Group References," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 84(1), pages 348-365, July.
  8. Shaun Hargreaves Heap & David Rojo Arjona & Robert Sugden, 2014. "How Portable Is Level‐0 Behavior? A Test of Level‐k Theory in Games With Non‐Neutral Frames," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 82(3), pages 1133-1151, May.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. David Rojo-Arjona & R. Stefania Sitzia & Jiwei Zheng, 2021. "Overcoming coordination failure in games with focal points: An experimental investigation," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Science (CBESS) 21-02, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..

    Cited by:

    1. Dong, Zhiqiang & Zhang, Yanren, 2022. "Tournaments as coordination devices: Theory and experimental evidence," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 100(C).

  2. Dan Kovenock & David Rojo Arjona, 2019. "A Full Characterization of Best-Response Functions in the Lottery Colonel Blotto Game," Working Papers 19-05, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.

    Cited by:

    1. Li, Xinmi & Zheng, Jie, 2022. "Pure strategy Nash Equilibrium in 2-contestant generalized lottery Colonel Blotto games," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    2. Anbarci, Nejat & Cingiz, Kutay & Ismail, Mehmet S., 2023. "Proportional resource allocation in dynamic n-player Blotto games," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 94-100.
    3. David Iliaev & Sigal Oren & Ella Segev, 2023. "A Tullock-contest-based approach for cyber security investments," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 320(1), pages 61-84, January.

  3. van Leeuwen, Boris & Ramalingam, Abhijit & Rojo Arjona, David & Schram, Arthur, 2019. "Centrality and cooperation in networks," Other publications TiSEM b668e3a4-b5a5-49f0-a7fe-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.

    Cited by:

    1. Brown, Christopher L., 2024. "Team production in endogenous networks," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 560-580.
    2. He, Simin & Zou, Xinlu, 2024. "Public goods provision in a network formation game," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 104-131.
    3. Abhijit Ramalingam & Brock V. Stoddard & James M. Walker, 2016. "The market for talent: Competition for resources and self governance in teams," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Science (CBESS) 16-15, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    4. Boosey, Luke & Isaac, R. Mark & Ramalingam, Abhijit, 2024. "Limiting the leader: Fairness concerns and opportunism in team production," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 209-244.
    5. Luke A. Boosey & Christopher Brown, 2021. "Contests with Network Externalities: Theory & Evidence," Working Papers wp2021_07_02, Department of Economics, Florida State University.
    6. Brock V. Stoddard & Caleb A. Cox & James M. Walker, 2021. "Incentivizing provision of collective goods: Allocation rules," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 87(4), pages 1345-1365, April.
    7. Billinger, Stephan & Rosenbaum, Stephen Mark, 2019. "Discretionary mechanisms and cooperation in hierarchies: An experimental study," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).

  4. Subhasish M. Chowdhury & Dan Kovenock & David Rojo Arjona & Nathaniel T. Wilcox, 2016. "Focality and Asymmetry in Multi-battle Contests," Working Papers 16-16, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.

    Cited by:

    1. Arad, Ayala & Penczynski, Stefan P., 2024. "Multi-dimensional reasoning in competitive resource allocation games: Evidence from intra-team communication," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 355-377.
    2. Kovenock, Dan & Roberson, Brian & Sheremeta, Roman, 2018. "The attack and defense of weakest-link networks," MPRA Paper 89292, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Li, Xinmi & Zheng, Jie, 2022. "Pure strategy Nash Equilibrium in 2-contestant generalized lottery Colonel Blotto games," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    4. Timothy N. Cason & Daniel Woods & Mustafa Abdallah & Saurabh Bagechi & Shreyas Sundaram, 2021. "Network Defense and Behavior Biases: An Experimental Study," Purdue University Economics Working Papers 1328, Purdue University, Department of Economics.
    5. Xiang Sun & Jin Xu & Junjie Zhou, 2023. "Effort Discrimination and Curvature of Contest Technology in Conflict Networks," Papers 2302.09861, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2023.
    6. Lu Dong & Lingbo Huang & Jaimie W. Lien & Jie Zheng, 2021. "How Alliances Form and Conflict Ensues," Discussion Papers 2021-04, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    7. Kovenock, Dan & Rojo Arjona, David, 2019. "A full characterization of best-response functions in the lottery Colonel Blotto game," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 33-36.
    8. David Iliaev & Sigal Oren & Ella Segev, 2023. "A Tullock-contest-based approach for cyber security investments," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 320(1), pages 61-84, January.

  5. Shaun Hargreaves Heap & Abhijit Ramalingam & David Rojo Arjona, 2015. "Social information 'nudges': An experiment with multiple group references," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Science (CBESS) 15-02, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..

    Cited by:

    1. Christoph Buehren & Maria Daskalakis, 2020. "Which green nudge helps to save energy? Experimental evidence," MAGKS Papers on Economics 202042, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    2. Christoph Bühren & Maria Daskalakis, 2015. "Do not incentivize eco-friendly behavior - Go for a competition to go green!," MAGKS Papers on Economics 201534, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).

  6. Ramalingam, Abhijit & Rojo Arjona, David & Schram, Arthur & Van Leeuwen, Boris, 2015. "Authority and Centrality: Power and Cooperation in Social Dilemma Networks," IAST Working Papers 15-23, Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse (IAST).

    Cited by:

    1. van Leeuwen, Boris & Ramalingam, Abhijit & Rojo Arjona, David & Schram, Arthur, 2019. "Centrality and cooperation in networks," Other publications TiSEM b668e3a4-b5a5-49f0-a7fe-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. Boris Leeuwen & Abhijit Ramalingam & David Rojo Arjona & Arthur Schram, 2019. "Centrality and cooperation in networks," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 22(1), pages 178-196, March.
    3. Xu, Xue, 2018. "Experiments on cooperation, institutions, and social preferences," Other publications TiSEM d3cf4dba-b0f3-4643-a267-7, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.

  7. Shaun Hargreaves Heap & David Rojo Arjona & Robert Sugden, 2012. "A Popperian test of level-k theory," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Science (CBESS) 12-06, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..

    Cited by:

    1. Cyril Hédoin & Lauren Larrouy, 2016. "Game Theory, Institutions and the Schelling-Bacharach Principle: Toward an Empirical Social Ontology," GREDEG Working Papers 2016-21, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.

Articles

  1. Rojo Arjona, David & Sitzia, Stefania & Zheng, Jiwei, 2022. "Overcoming coordination failure in games with focal points: An experimental investigation," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 505-523.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  2. Subhasish M Chowdhury & Dan Kovenock & David Rojo Arjona & Nathaniel T Wilcox, 2021. "Focality and Asymmetry in Multi-Battle Contests," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 131(636), pages 1593-1619.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  3. Boris Leeuwen & Abhijit Ramalingam & David Rojo Arjona & Arthur Schram, 2019. "Centrality and cooperation in networks," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 22(1), pages 178-196, March.

    Cited by:

    1. Brown, Christopher L., 2024. "Team production in endogenous networks," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 560-580.
    2. He, Simin & Zou, Xinlu, 2024. "Public goods provision in a network formation game," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 104-131.
    3. Abhijit Ramalingam & Brock V. Stoddard & James M. Walker, 2016. "The market for talent: Competition for resources and self governance in teams," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Science (CBESS) 16-15, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    4. Boosey, Luke & Isaac, R. Mark & Ramalingam, Abhijit, 2024. "Limiting the leader: Fairness concerns and opportunism in team production," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 209-244.
    5. Luke A. Boosey & Christopher Brown, 2021. "Contests with Network Externalities: Theory & Evidence," Working Papers wp2021_07_02, Department of Economics, Florida State University.
    6. Brock V. Stoddard & Caleb A. Cox & James M. Walker, 2021. "Incentivizing provision of collective goods: Allocation rules," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 87(4), pages 1345-1365, April.
    7. Billinger, Stephan & Rosenbaum, Stephen Mark, 2019. "Discretionary mechanisms and cooperation in hierarchies: An experimental study," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).

  4. Kovenock, Dan & Rojo Arjona, David, 2019. "A full characterization of best-response functions in the lottery Colonel Blotto game," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 33-36.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  5. Fatas, Enrique & Hargreaves Heap, Shaun P. & Rojo Arjona, David, 2018. "Preference conformism: An experiment," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 71-82.

    Cited by:

    1. Natalia Borzino & Enrique Fatas & Emmanuel Peterle, 2023. "In transparency we trust an experimental study of reputation, transparency, and signaling," Post-Print hal-04532867, HAL.
    2. Yonas Alem & Martin G. Kocher & Simon Schürz & Fredrik Carlsson & Mikael Lindahl, 2023. "Distributional preferences in adolescent peer networks," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 26(1), pages 223-248, March.
    3. Konc, Théo & Savin, Ivan & van den Bergh, Jeroen C.J.M., 2021. "The social multiplier of environmental policy: Application to carbon taxation," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    4. Kamal Bookwala & Caleb Gallemore & Joaquín Gómez‐Miñambres, 2022. "The influence of food recommendations: Evidence from a randomized field experiment," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 60(4), pages 1898-1910, October.
    5. Lara Ezquerra Guerra & Joaquín Gómez Miñambres & Natalia Jimenez & Praveen Kujal, 2021. "Making it public: The effect of (private and public) wage proposals on efficiency and income distribution," Working Papers 21.12, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Economics.
    6. Isler, Ozan & Gächter, Simon, 2022. "Conforming with peers in honesty and cooperation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 75-86.
    7. Eugen Dimant, 2018. "Contagion of Pro- and Anti-Social Behavior Among Peers and the Role of Social Proximity," Discussion Papers 2018-04, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    8. Gabriele Camera & Lukas Hohl, 2021. "Group-identity and long-run cooperation: an experiment," Working Papers 21-10, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
    9. Enrique Fatas & Antonio J. Morales, 2018. "The joy of ruling: an experimental investigation on collective giving," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 85(2), pages 179-200, August.
    10. Hidalgo-Hidalgo, Marisa & Jiménez, Natalia & López-Pintado, Dunia, 2021. "Social influence and position effects," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 113-131.
    11. Shoji, Masahiro, 2020. "Guilt and Antisocial Conformism: Experimental Evidence from Bangladesh," MPRA Paper 100735, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Heap, Shaun P. Hargreaves & Matakos, Konstantinos & Weber, Nina Sophie, 2020. "Non-selfish behaviour: Are social preferences or social norms revealed in distribution decisions?," SocArXiv g4c2m, Center for Open Science.
    13. Florian H. Schneider, 2020. "Signaling ideology through consumption," ECON - Working Papers 367, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised Jul 2022.
    14. Ambler, Kate & Godlonton, Susan & Recalde, María P., 2021. "Follow the leader? A field experiment on social influence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 1280-1297.
    15. José Gabriel Castillo & Zhicheng Phil Xu & Ping Zhang & Xianchen Zhu, 2021. "The effects of centralized power and institutional legitimacy on collective action," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 56(2), pages 385-419, February.
    16. Stefania Innocenti & Robin Cowan, 2019. "Self-efficacy beliefs and imitation : A two-armed bandit experiment," Post-Print hal-03213711, HAL.
    17. Rockenbach, Bettina & Tonke, Sebastian & Weiss, Arne R., 2021. "Self-serving behavior of the rich causes contagion effects among the poor," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 289-300.
    18. Fabian Dvorak & Urs Fischbacher & Katrin Schmelz, 2020. "Incentives for Conformity and Anticonformity," TWI Research Paper Series 122, Thurgauer Wirtschaftsinstitut, Universität Konstanz.
    19. Ezquerra, Lara & Gómez-Miñambres, Joaquín & Jimenez, Natalia & Kujal, Praveen, 2023. "The effect of wage proposals on efficiency and income distribution," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 469-493.

  6. Shaun P. Hargreaves Heap & David Rojo Arjona & Robert Sugden, 2017. "Coordination when there are restricted and unrestricted options," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 83(1), pages 107-129, June.

    Cited by:

    1. Swee-Hoon Chuah & Robert Hoffmann & Jeremy Larner, 2019. "Is knowledge curse or blessing in pure coordination problems?," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 87(1), pages 123-146, July.
    2. Alessandro Sontuoso & Sudeep Bhatia, 2017. "A Notion of Prominence for Games with Natural-Language Labels," PPE Working Papers 0009, Philosophy, Politics and Economics, University of Pennsylvania, revised Nov 2018.
    3. Simon Gaechter & Chris Starmer & Christian Thoeni & Fabio Tufano & Till O Weber, 2021. "Social closeness can help, harm and be irrelevant in solving pure coordination problems," Discussion Papers 2021-09, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    4. David Rojo-Arjona & R. Stefania Sitzia & Jiwei Zheng, 2021. "Overcoming coordination failure in games with focal points: An experimental investigation," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Science (CBESS) 21-02, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..

  7. Shaun Hargreaves Heap & Abhijit Ramalingam & David Rojo Arjona, 2017. "Social Information “Nudges”: An Experiment with Multiple Group References," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 84(1), pages 348-365, July.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  8. Shaun Hargreaves Heap & David Rojo Arjona & Robert Sugden, 2014. "How Portable Is Level‐0 Behavior? A Test of Level‐k Theory in Games With Non‐Neutral Frames," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 82(3), pages 1133-1151, May.

    Cited by:

    1. Shurchkov, Olga, 2016. "Public announcements and coordination in dynamic global games: Experimental evidence," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 20-30.
    2. Wright, James R. & Leyton-Brown, Kevin, 2017. "Predicting human behavior in unrepeated, simultaneous-move games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 16-37.
    3. Marco Mantovani, 2015. "Limited backward induction: foresight and behavior in sequential games," Working Papers 289, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics, revised Jan 2015.
    4. Subhasish M. Chowdhury & Dan Kovenock & David Rojo Arjona & Nathaniel T. Wilcox, 2016. "Focality and Asymmetry in Multi-battle Contests," Working Papers 16-16, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
    5. Crawford, Vincent P., 2018. "“Fatal Attraction” and Level-k thinking in games with Non-neutral frames," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 219-224.
    6. Noemí Navarro & Róbert F. Veszteg, 2020. "On the empirical validity of axioms in unstructured bargaining," Post-Print hal-02873121, HAL.
    7. Marco Serena, 2017. "A Belief-based Theory for Private Information Games," Working Papers tax-mpg-rps-2018-12, Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance.
    8. Carlos Alós-Ferrer & Johannes Buckenmaier, 2021. "Cognitive sophistication and deliberation times," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 24(2), pages 558-592, June.
    9. Seth Frey & Robert L. Goldstone, 2018. "Cognitive mechanisms for human flocking dynamics," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 349-375, September.
    10. Nagel, Rosemarie & Bühren, Christoph & Frank, Björn, 2017. "Inspired and inspiring: Hervé Moulin and the discovery of the beauty contest game," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 191-207.
    11. Guilhem Lecouteux, 2017. "Bayesian Game Theorists and Non-Bayesian Players," GREDEG Working Papers 2017-30, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France, revised Jul 2018.
    12. Nobuyuki Hanaki, 2020. "Cognitive ability and observed behavior in laboratory experiments: implications for macroeconomic theory," The Japanese Economic Review, Springer, vol. 71(3), pages 355-378, July.
    13. Kota Murayama, 2020. "Robust predictions under finite depth of reasoning," The Japanese Economic Review, Springer, vol. 71(1), pages 59-84, January.
    14. Berger, Ulrich & De Silva, Hannelore & Fellner-Röhling, Gerlinde, 2016. "Cognitive Hierarchies in the Minimizer Game," Department of Economics Working Paper Series 211, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    15. Irenaeus Wolff, 2021. "The Lottery Player's Fallacy Why Labels Predict Strategic Choices," TWI Research Paper Series 124, Thurgauer Wirtschaftsinstitut, Universität Konstanz.
    16. Colin F. Camerer & Gideon Nave & Alec Smith, 2019. "Dynamic Unstructured Bargaining with Private Information: Theory, Experiment, and Outcome Prediction via Machine Learning," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(4), pages 1867-1890, April.
    17. Alessandro Sontuoso & Sudeep Bhatia, 2017. "A Notion of Prominence for Games with Natural-Language Labels," PPE Working Papers 0009, Philosophy, Politics and Economics, University of Pennsylvania, revised Nov 2018.
    18. Hanh T. Tong & David J. Freeman, 2021. "Anchors of Strategic Reasoning in the Traveler's Dilemma," Discussion Papers dp21-09, Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University.
    19. Christoph Engel, 2021. "Crime as Conditional Rule Violation," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2021_20, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    20. Antonio J. Morales & Enrique Fatas, 2021. "Price competition and nominal illusion: experimental evidence and a behavioural model," SERIEs: Journal of the Spanish Economic Association, Springer;Spanish Economic Association, vol. 12(4), pages 607-632, December.
    21. Wolff, Irenaeus, 2016. "Elicited salience and salience-based level-k," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 134-137.
    22. Irenaeus Wolff, 2019. "Lucky Numbers in Simple Games," TWI Research Paper Series 115, Thurgauer Wirtschaftsinstitut, Universität Konstanz.
    23. García-Pola, Bernardo, 2020. "Do people minimize regret in strategic situations? A level-k comparison," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 82-104.
    24. Parravano, Melanie & Poulsen, Odile, 2015. "Stake size and the power of focal points in coordination games: Experimental evidence," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 191-199.
    25. David Rojo-Arjona & R. Stefania Sitzia & Jiwei Zheng, 2021. "Overcoming coordination failure in games with focal points: An experimental investigation," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Science (CBESS) 21-02, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    26. Kota Murayama, 2015. "Robust Predictions under Finite Depth of Reasoning," Discussion Paper Series DP2015-28, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
    27. Marcus Dittrich & Kristina Leipold, 2014. "Gender Differences in Strategic Reasoning," CESifo Working Paper Series 4763, CESifo.
    28. Marco Faillo & Alessandra Smerilli & Robert Sugden, 2016. "Can a single theory explain coordination? An experiment on alternative modes of reasoning and the conditions under which they are used," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Science (CBESS) 16-01, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    29. Ayala Arad & Benjamin Bachi & Amnon Maltz, 2023. "On the relevance of irrelevant strategies," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 26(5), pages 1142-1184, November.
    30. Faillo, Marco & Smerilli, Alessandra & Sugden, Robert, 2017. "Bounded best-response and collective-optimality reasoning in coordination games," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 317-335.
    31. David Rojo Arjona & Stefania Sitzia & Jiwei Zheng, 2021. "Overcoming coordination failure in games with focal points," Working Papers 335109305, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department.
    32. Ireneaus Wolff, 2016. "Elicited Salience and Salience-Based Level-k," TWI Research Paper Series 103, Thurgauer Wirtschaftsinstitut, Universität Konstanz.
    33. Jin, Ye, 2022. "Reinvestigating Rk behavior in ring games," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 98(C).

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 9 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-EXP: Experimental Economics (8) 2015-03-27 2015-04-19 2015-09-11 2016-08-28 2017-01-22 2020-12-14 2021-09-06 2023-04-10. Author is listed
  2. NEP-GTH: Game Theory (7) 2015-04-19 2015-09-11 2016-08-28 2017-01-22 2019-03-18 2021-09-06 2023-04-10. Author is listed
  3. NEP-CBE: Cognitive and Behavioural Economics (3) 2015-03-27 2015-09-11 2021-09-06
  4. NEP-CDM: Collective Decision-Making (3) 2015-04-19 2015-09-11 2023-04-10
  5. NEP-NET: Network Economics (2) 2015-04-19 2015-09-11
  6. NEP-SOC: Social Norms and Social Capital (2) 2015-04-19 2015-09-11
  7. NEP-DCM: Discrete Choice Models (1) 2023-04-10
  8. NEP-EVO: Evolutionary Economics (1) 2023-04-10
  9. NEP-HME: Heterodox Microeconomics (1) 2015-09-11
  10. NEP-ISF: Islamic Finance (1) 2021-09-06
  11. NEP-MIC: Microeconomics (1) 2021-09-06

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, David Rojo Arjona should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.