Crime as Conditional Rule Violation
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Engel, Christoph & Beckenkamp, Martin & Glöckner, Andreas & Irlenbusch, Bernd & Hennig-Schmidt, Heike & Kube, Sebastian & Kurschilgen, Michael & Morell, Alexander & Nicklisch, Andreas & Normann, Hans-, 2014.
"First impressions are more important than early intervention: Qualifying broken windows theory in the lab,"
International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 126-136.
- Martin Beckenkamp & Christoph Engel & Andreas Glöckner & Bernd Irlenbusch & Heike Hennig-Schmidt & Sebastian Kube & Michael Kurschilgen & Alexander Morell & Andreas Nicklisch & Hans-Theo Normann & Ema, 2009. "First Impressions are More Important than Early Intervention Qualifying Broken Windows Theory in the Lab," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2009_21, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, revised Jan 2013.
- Fischbacher, Urs & Gächter, Simon & Quercia, Simone, 2012.
"The behavioral validity of the strategy method in public good experiments,"
Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 897-913.
- Urs Fischbacher & Simon Gaechter, 2009. "The behavioral validity of the strategy method in public good experiments," Discussion Papers 2009-25, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
- Haisley, Emily C. & Weber, Roberto A., 2010. "Self-serving interpretations of ambiguity in other-regarding behavior," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 614-625, March.
- Erik O. Kimbrough & Alexander Vostroknutov, 2016.
"Norms Make Preferences Social,"
Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 14(3), pages 608-638, June.
- Erik O. Kimbrough & Alexander Vostroknutov, 2016. "Norms Make Preferences Social," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 14(3), pages 608-638.
- Erik O. Kimbrough & Alexander Vostroknutov, 2013. "Norms Make Preferences Social," Discussion Papers dp13-01, Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University.
- Erik Kimbrough & Alexander Vostroknutov, 2014. "Norms Make Preferences Social," Discussion Papers dp14-06, Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University.
- Gary S. Becker, 1974.
"Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach,"
NBER Chapters, in: Essays in the Economics of Crime and Punishment, pages 1-54,
National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Gary S. Becker, 1968. "Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 76(2), pages 169-169.
- Hausman, Jerry A & Taylor, William E, 1981.
"Panel Data and Unobservable Individual Effects,"
Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 49(6), pages 1377-1398, November.
- Hausman, Jerry A. & Taylor, William E., 1981. "Panel data and unobservable individual effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 155-155, May.
- J. A. Hausman & W. E. Taylor, 1980. "Panel Data and Unobservable Individual Effects," Working papers 255, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Department of Economics.
- Fischbacher, Urs & Gachter, Simon & Fehr, Ernst, 2001.
"Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment,"
Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 71(3), pages 397-404, June.
- Urs Fischbacher & Simon Gaechter & Ernst Fehr, "undated". "Are People Conditionally Cooperative? Evidence from a Public Goods Experiment," IEW - Working Papers 016, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - University of Zurich.
- Dai, Zhixin & Hogarth, Robin M. & Villeval, Marie Claire, 2015.
"Ambiguity on audits and cooperation in a public goods game,"
European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 146-162.
- Zhixin Dai & Robin M. Hogarth & Marie Claire Villeval, 2014. "Ambiguity on audits and cooperation in a public goods game," Post-Print halshs-01096090, HAL.
- Zhixin Dai & Robin M. Hogarth & Marie Claire Villeval, 2014. "Ambiguity on audits and cooperation in a public goods game," Working Papers halshs-00944500, HAL.
- Zhixin Dai & Robin M. Hogarth & Marie Claire Villeval, 2014. "Ambiguity on audits and cooperation in a public goods game," Working Papers 1403, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.
- Zhixin Dai & Robin M. Hogarth & Marie Claire Villeval, 2015. "Ambiguity on audits and cooperation in a public goods game," Post-Print halshs-01089700, HAL.
- Dai, Zhixin & Hogarth, Robin M. & Villeval, Marie Claire, 2014. "Ambiguity on Audits and Cooperation in a Public Goods Game," IZA Discussion Papers 7932, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Crawford, Vincent P., 2018.
"“Fatal Attraction” and Level-k thinking in games with Non-neutral frames,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 219-224.
- Crawford, Vincent P, 2018. "“Fatal Attraction” and Level-k thinking in games with Non-neutral frames," University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series qt99q8h4pt, Department of Economics, UC San Diego.
- Engel, Christoph & Reuben, Alicja, 2015. "The people's hired guns? Experimentally testing the motivating force of a legal frame," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 67-82.
- Bruno S. Frey & Stephan Meier, 2004.
"Social Comparisons and Pro-social Behavior: Testing "Conditional Cooperation" in a Field Experiment,"
American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 94(5), pages 1717-1722, December.
- Bruno S. Frey & Stephan Meier, "undated". "Social Comparisons and Pro-social Behavior - Testing "Conditional Cooperation" in a Field Experiment," IEW - Working Papers 162, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - University of Zurich.
- Ai, Chunrong & Norton, Edward C., 2003. "Interaction terms in logit and probit models," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 80(1), pages 123-129, July.
- Berg Joyce & Dickhaut John & McCabe Kevin, 1995. "Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 122-142, July.
- Chen, Daniel L. & Schonger, Martin & Wickens, Chris, 2016.
"oTree—An open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments,"
Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 9(C), pages 88-97.
- Chen, Daniel Li & Schonger, Martin & Wickens, Chris, 2015. "oTree - An Open-Source Platform for Laboratory, Online, and Field Experiments," MPRA Paper 62730, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Desmet, Pieter T.M. & Engel, Christoph, 2021.
"People are conditional rule followers,"
Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
- Pieter Desmet & Christoph Engel, 2017. "People Are Conditional Rule Followers," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2017_09, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
- Krupka, Erin & Weber, Roberto A., 2009.
"The focusing and informational effects of norms on pro-social behavior,"
Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 307-320, June.
- Krupka, Erin L. & Weber, Roberto A., 2007. "The Focusing and Informational Effects of Norms on Pro-Social Behavior," IZA Discussion Papers 3169, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Jen Shang & Rachel Croson, 2009.
"A Field Experiment in Charitable Contribution: The Impact of Social Information on the Voluntary Provision of Public Goods,"
Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 119(540), pages 1422-1439, October.
- Jen Shang & Rachel Croson, 2009. "A Field Experiment in Charitable Contribution: The Impact of Social Information on the Voluntary Provision of Public Goods," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 119(540), pages 1422-1439, October.
- Ritwik Banerjee, 2016.
"On the interpretation of bribery in a laboratory corruption game: moral frames and social norms,"
Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 19(1), pages 240-267, March.
- Ritwik Banerjee, 2016. "On the interpretation of bribery in a laboratory corruption game: moral frames and social norms," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 19(1), pages 240-267, March.
- Ritwik Banerjee, 2014. "On the Interpretation of Bribery in a Laboratory Corruption Game: Moral Frames and Social Norms," Economics Working Papers 2014-18, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
- Shaun Hargreaves Heap & David Rojo Arjona & Robert Sugden, 2014. "How Portable Is Level‐0 Behavior? A Test of Level‐k Theory in Games With Non‐Neutral Frames," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 82(3), pages 1133-1151, May.
- Engel, Christoph & Kube, Sebastian & Kurschilgen, Michael, 2021. "Managing expectations: How selective information affects cooperation and punishment in social dilemma games," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 111-136.
- Bruno Frey & Stephan Meier, 2004. "In a field experiment," Natural Field Experiments 00243, The Field Experiments Website.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Engel, Christoph & Kube, Sebastian & Kurschilgen, Michael, 2021. "Managing expectations: How selective information affects cooperation and punishment in social dilemma games," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 111-136.
- Florian Diekert & Tillmann Eymess & Joseph Luomba & Israel Waichman, 2022.
"The Creation of Social Norms under Weak Institutions,"
Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 9(6), pages 1127-1160.
- Diekert, Florian & Eymess, Tillmann & Luomba, Joseph & Waichman, Israel, 2020. "The Creation of Social Norms under Weak Institutions," Working Papers 0684, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
- Rockenbach, Bettina & Tonke, Sebastian & Weiss, Arne R., 2021. "Self-serving behavior of the rich causes contagion effects among the poor," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 289-300.
- Simon Gaechter, 2014.
"Human Pro-Social Motivation and the Maintenance of Social Order,"
Discussion Papers
2014-02, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
- Simon Gaechter, 2014. "Human Pro-Social Motivation and the Maintenance of Social Order," CESifo Working Paper Series 4729, CESifo.
- Timo Goeschl & Sara Elisa Kettner & Johannes Lohse & Christiane Schwieren, 2018. "From Social Information to Social Norms: Evidence from Two Experiments on Donation Behaviour," Games, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-25, November.
- Goerg, Sebastian J. & Himmler, Oliver & König, Tobias, 2024.
"Norm violations and behavioral spillovers—Evidence from the lab and the field,"
European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
- Goerg, Sebastian J. & Himmler, Oliver & König, Tobias, 2024. "Norm Violations and Behavioral Spillovers: Evidence from the Lab and the Field," Working Papers in Economics and Statistics 8/2024, Linnaeus University, School of Business and Economics, Department of Economics and Statistics.
- Drouvelis, Michalis & Marx, Benjamin M., 2022.
"Can charitable appeals identify and exploit belief heterogeneity?,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 631-649.
- Michalis Drouvelis & Benjamin M. Marx, 2021. "Can Charitable Appeals Identify and Exploit Belief Heterogeneity?," CESifo Working Paper Series 8855, CESifo.
- Vyrastekova, Jana & Funaki, Yukihiko, 2018. "Cooperation in a sequential dilemma game: How much transparency is good for cooperation?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 88-95.
- Dimant, Eugen, 2015.
"On Peer Effects: Behavioral Contagion of (Un)Ethical Behavior and the Role of Social Identity,"
MPRA Paper
68732, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Eugen Dimant, 2016. "On Peer Effects: Contagion of Pro- and Anti-Social Behavior in Charitable Giving and The Role of Social Identity," PPE Working Papers 0006, Philosophy, Politics and Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
- Eugen Dimant, 2017. "On Peer Effects: Contagion of Pro- and Anti-Social Behavior and the Role of Social Cohesion," Discussion Papers 2017-06, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
- Eugen Dimant, 2018. "Contagion of Pro- and Anti-Social Behavior Among Peers and the Role of Social Proximity," Discussion Papers 2018-04, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
- Simon Gächter & Daniele Nosenzo & Martin Sefton, 2013.
"Peer Effects In Pro-Social Behavior: Social Norms Or Social Preferences?,"
Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 11(3), pages 548-573, June.
- Simon Gaechter & Daniele Nosenzo & Martin Sefton, 2010. "Peer Effects In Pro-Social Behavior: Social Norms Or Social Preferences?," Discussion Papers 2010-23, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
- Simon Gachter & Daniele Nosenzo & Martin Sefton, 2012. "Peer Effects in Pro-Social Behaviour: Social Norms or Social Preferences?," Discussion Papers 2012-01, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
- Gächter, Simon & Nosenzo, Daniele & Sefton, Martin, 2012. "Peer Effects in Pro-Social Behavior: Social Norms or Social Preferences?," IZA Discussion Papers 6345, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Eugen Dimant & Michele Gelfand & Anna Hochleitner & Silvia Sonderegger, 2022. "Strategic Behavior with Tight, Loose and Polarized Norms," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 198, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
- Kölle, Felix & Quercia, Simone, 2021.
"The influence of empirical and normative expectations on cooperation,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 691-703.
- Felix Kölle & Simone Quercia, 2021. "The Influence of Empirical and Normative Expectations on Cooperation," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 099, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
- Michael Kurschilgen, 2023.
"Moral awareness polarizes people’s fairness judgments,"
Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 61(2), pages 339-364, August.
- Michael Kurschilgen, 2021. "Moral awareness polarizes people's fairness judgments," Munich Papers in Political Economy 17, Munich School of Politics and Public Policy and the School of Management at the Technical University of Munich.
- Crawford, Ian & Harris, Donna, 2018. "Social interactions and the influence of “extremists”," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 238-266.
- Simon Gächter & Daniele Nosenzo & Martin Sefton, 2013.
"Peer Effects In Pro-Social Behavior: Social Norms Or Social Preferences?,"
Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 11(3), pages 548-573, June.
- Simon Gaechter & Daniele Nosenzo & Martin Sefton, 2010. "Peer Effects In Pro-Social Behavior: Social Norms Or Social Preferences?," Discussion Papers 2010-23, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
- Simon Gaechter & Daniele Nosenzo & Martin Sefton, 2010. "Peer Effects In Pro-Social Behavior: Social Norms Or Social Preferences?," Discussion Papers 2010-23, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
- Gächter, Simon & Nosenzo, Daniele & Sefton, Martin, 2012. "Peer Effects in Pro-Social Behavior: Social Norms or Social Preferences?," IZA Discussion Papers 6345, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Simon Gachter & Daniele Nosenzo & Martin Sefton, 2012. "Peer Effects in Pro-Social Behaviour: Social Norms or Social Preferences?," Discussion Papers 2012-01, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
- O'Garra, Tanya & Sisco, Matthew R., 2018. "Redistribution and Social Information (ReSoc)," SocArXiv 28xwv, Center for Open Science.
- Ennio Bilancini & Leonardo Boncinelli & Valerio Capraro & Tatiana Celadin & Roberto Di Paolo, 2020. ""Do the right thing" for whom? An experiment on ingroup favouritism, group assorting and moral suasion," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 15(2), pages 182-192, March.
- Lorenz Goette & Egon Tripodi, 2021.
"Social Influence in Prosocial Behavior: Evidence from a Large-Scale Experiment [“Social Distance and Social Decisions],"
Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 19(4), pages 2373-2398.
- Goette, Lorenz & Tripodi, Egon, 2018. "Social Influence in Prosocial Behavior:Evidence from a Large-Scale Experiment," CEPR Discussion Papers 13078, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Christoph Feldhaus & Tassilo Sobotta & Peter Werner, 2019. "Norm Uncertainty and Voluntary Payments in the Field," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(4), pages 1855-1866, April.
- Simon Gächter & Daniele Nosenzo & Martin Sefton, 2012.
"The Impact of Social Comparisons on Reciprocity,"
Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 114(4), pages 1346-1367, December.
- Simon Gaechter & Daniele Nosenzo & Martin Sefton, 2008. "The Impact of Social Comparisons on Reciprocity," Discussion Papers 2008-09, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
- Gächter, Simon & Nosenzo, Daniele & Sefton, Martin, 2008. "The Impact of Social Comparisons on Reciprocity," IZA Discussion Papers 3639, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Simon Gaechter & Daniele Nosenzo & Martin Sefton, 2010. "The Impact of Social Camparisons of Reciprocity," Discussion Papers 2010-10, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
More about this item
Keywords
decision to engage in criminal behavior; normativity; deontological motives; rule following; social context; social information; conditional rule following;All these keywords.
NEP fields
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:- NEP-CBE-2021-11-22 (Cognitive and Behavioural Economics)
- NEP-CDM-2021-11-22 (Collective Decision-Making)
- NEP-EXP-2021-11-22 (Experimental Economics)
- NEP-LAW-2021-11-22 (Law and Economics)
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mpg:wpaper:2021_20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marc Martin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mppggde.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.