IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/ppa1249.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Romans Pancs

Personal Details

First Name:Romans
Middle Name:
Last Name:Pancs
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:ppa1249
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]

Affiliation

Centro de Investigación Económica (CIE)
Departamento Académico de Economía
Instituto Tecnólogico Autónomo de México (ITAM)

México, Mexico
http://cie.itam.mx/
RePEc:edi:ciitamx (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles

Working papers

  1. Arina Nikandrova & Romans Pancs, 2015. "Dynamic Project Selection," Birkbeck Working Papers in Economics and Finance 1505, Birkbeck, Department of Economics, Mathematics & Statistics.
  2. Arina Nikandrova & Romans Pancs, 2015. "An Optimal Auction with Moral Hazard," Birkbeck Working Papers in Economics and Finance 1504, Birkbeck, Department of Economics, Mathematics & Statistics.
  3. Romans Pancs & Nicolaas J. Vriend, 2002. "Schelling's Neighborhood Segregation Model Revisited," Computing in Economics and Finance 2002 96, Society for Computational Economics.
  4. HINDRIKS , Jean & PANCS, Romans, 2002. "Free riding on altruism and group size," LIDAM Reprints CORE 1560, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).

    repec:qmw:qmwecw:wp436 is not listed on IDEAS
    repec:qmw:qmwecw:wp487 is not listed on IDEAS
  5. Romans Pancs & Nicolaas J. Vriend, "undated". "Schelling's Spatial Proximity Model of Segregation Revisited," Modeling, Computing, and Mastering Complexity 2003 15, Society for Computational Economics.

Articles

  1. Nikandrova, Arina & Pancs, Romans, 2018. "Dynamic project selection," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 13(1), January.
  2. Pancs Romans, 2017. "Tight and Loose Coupling in Organizations," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 17(1), pages 1-33, January.
  3. Nikandrova, Arina & Pancs, Romans, 2017. "Conjugate information disclosure in an auction with learning," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 174-212.
  4. Romans Pancs, 2015. "Efficient dark markets," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 59(3), pages 605-624, August.
  5. Pancs, Romans, 2014. "The negative value of public information in the Glosten–Milgrom model," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 207-210.
  6. Romans Pancs, 2014. "Workup," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 18(1), pages 37-71, March.
  7. Romans Pancs, 2014. "Designing Order-Book Transparency In Electronic Communication Networks," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 12(3), pages 702-723, June.
  8. Pancs, Romans, 2013. "Sequential negotiations with costly information acquisition," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 522-543.
  9. Pancs Romans, 2010. "Communication, Innovation, and Growth," The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-54, February.
  10. Pancs, Romans & Vriend, Nicolaas J., 2007. "Schelling's spatial proximity model of segregation revisited," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(1-2), pages 1-24, February.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Arina Nikandrova & Romans Pancs, 2015. "Dynamic Project Selection," Birkbeck Working Papers in Economics and Finance 1505, Birkbeck, Department of Economics, Mathematics & Statistics.

    Cited by:

    1. Inga Deimen & Julia Wirtz, 2021. "Control, Cost, and Confidence:Perseverance and Procrastination in the Face of Failure," Bristol Economics Discussion Papers 21/738, School of Economics, University of Bristol, UK.
    2. Gossner, Olivier & Steiner, Jakub & Stewart, Colin, 2021. "Attention please!," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 107907, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Yeon-Koo Che & Konrad Mierendorff, 2018. "Optimal Dynamic Allocation of Attention," Papers 1812.06967, arXiv.org.
    4. Mayskaya, Tatiana, 2024. "Following beliefs or excluding the worst? The role of unfindable state in learning," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    5. Christoph Carnehl & Johannes Schneider, 2021. "On Risk and Time Pressure: When to Think and When to Do," Papers 2111.07451, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2022.
    6. Herresthal, Claudia, 2022. "Hidden testing and selective disclosure of evidence," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).

  2. Arina Nikandrova & Romans Pancs, 2015. "An Optimal Auction with Moral Hazard," Birkbeck Working Papers in Economics and Finance 1504, Birkbeck, Department of Economics, Mathematics & Statistics.

    Cited by:

    1. Nikandrova, Arina & Pancs, Romans, 2017. "Conjugate information disclosure in an auction with learning," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 174-212.

  3. HINDRIKS , Jean & PANCS, Romans, 2002. "Free riding on altruism and group size," LIDAM Reprints CORE 1560, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).

    Cited by:

    1. Moore, Alexander K. & Lewis, Joshua & Levine, Emma E. & Schweitzer, Maurice E., 2023. "Benevolent friends and high integrity leaders: How preferences for benevolence and integrity change across relationships," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    2. Nöldeke, Georg & Peña, Jorge, 2020. "Group size and collective action in a binary contribution game," IAST Working Papers 18-86, Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse (IAST).
    3. Cohen-Vernik, Dinah & Pazgal, Amit & Syam, Niladri B., 2019. "Competing with co-created products," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 63-82.
    4. Jayson Lusk & Tomas Nilsson & Ken Foster, 2007. "Public Preferences and Private Choices: Effect of Altruism and Free Riding on Demand for Environmentally Certified Pork," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 36(4), pages 499-521, April.
    5. Gerlinde Fellner & Magdalena Margreiter & Nuria Oses Eraso, 2003. "When the past is present – The ratchet effect in the local commons," Papers on Strategic Interaction 2003-23, Max Planck Institute of Economics, Strategic Interaction Group.
    6. Rainer Bartel, 2007. "Der öffentliche Sektor in der Defensive," Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft - WuG, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik, vol. 33(2), pages 199-230.
    7. Niladri B. Syam & Amit Pazgal, 2013. "Co-Creation with Production Externalities," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(5), pages 805-820, September.
    8. Ujiie, Kiyokazu, 2011. "The Effect of Altruism on Consumer Behavior in Japan: an Analysis on Rice Consumption using Scanner Data," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 116094, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Schippers, Anouk L. & Soetevent, Adriaan R., 2022. "Sharing with Minimal Regulation? Free Riding and Neighborhood Book Exchange," EconStor Preprints 249448, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    10. Makris, Miltiadis, 2009. "Private provision of discrete public goods," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 292-299, September.

  4. Romans Pancs & Nicolaas J. Vriend, "undated". "Schelling's Spatial Proximity Model of Segregation Revisited," Modeling, Computing, and Mastering Complexity 2003 15, Society for Computational Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. Colman, Andrew M., 2006. "Thomas C. Schelling's psychological decision theory: Introduction to a special issue," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 27(5), pages 603-608, October.
    2. Giorgio Fagiolo & Marco Valente & Nicolaas J. Vriend, 2005. "Segregation in Networks," LEM Papers Series 2005/22, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    3. Pierre M. Picard & Pascal Mossay, 2013. "Spatial Segregation and Urban Structure," DEM Discussion Paper Series 13-03, Department of Economics at the University of Luxembourg.
    4. Hanaki, Nobuyuki & Tanimura, Emily & Vriend, Nicolaas J., 2019. "The Principle of Minimum Differentiation revisited: Return of the median voter," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 145-170.
    5. Dai Zusai & Futao Lu, 2017. "Polarization and Segregation through Conformity Pressure and Voluntary Migration: Simulation Analysis of Co-Evolutionary Dynamics," Games, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-14, November.
    6. Alonso-Villar, Olga & del Río, Coral, 2010. "Local versus overall segregation measures," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 30-38, July.
    7. Dilip Mookherjee & Stefan Napel & Debraj Ray, 2010. "Aspirations, Segregation, and Occupational Choice," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 8(1), pages 139-168, March.
    8. Anand Sahasranaman & Henrik Jeldtoft Jensen, 2016. "Dynamics of Transformation from Segregation to Mixed Wealth Cities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-12, November.
    9. Tatjana Ibraimovic & Stephane Hess, 2017. "Changes in the ethnic composition of neighbourhoods: Analysis of household's response and asymmetric preference structures," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 96(4), pages 759-784, November.
    10. John Lynham & Philip R. Neary, 2021. "Tiebout sorting in online communities," Papers 2110.05608, arXiv.org, revised May 2024.
    11. Zhaohua Zhang & Derrick Robinson & Diane Hite, 2018. "Racial Residential Segregation: Measuring Location Choice Attributes of Environmental Quality and Self-Segregation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, April.
    12. Akihisa Okada & Daisuke Inoue & Shihori Koyama & Tadayoshi Matsumori & Hiroaki Yoshida, 2022. "Dynamical cooperation model for mitigating the segregation phase in Schelling’s model," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 95(10), pages 1-10, October.
    13. Ioannides, Yannis M., 2015. "Neighborhoods to nations via social interactions," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 5-15.
    14. Rosenthal, Stuart S. & Ross, Stephen L., 2015. "Change and Persistence in the Economic Status of Neighborhoods and Cities," Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, in: Gilles Duranton & J. V. Henderson & William C. Strange (ed.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, edition 1, volume 5, chapter 0, pages 1047-1120, Elsevier.
    15. Troy Tassier, 2013. "Handbook of Research on Complexity, by J. Barkley Rosser, Jr. and Edward Elgar," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 39(1), pages 132-133.
    16. Christophe Lévêque & Mohamed Saleh, 2018. "Does Industrialization Affect Segregation? Evidence from Nineteenth-Century Cairo," Post-Print hal-04449557, HAL.
    17. Roy Cerqueti & Luca de Benedictis & Valerio Leone Sciabolazza, 2022. "Segregation with social linkages: Evaluating Schelling’s model with networked individuals," Post-Print hal-03789157, HAL.
    18. Caridi, I. & Pinasco, J.P. & Saintier, N. & Schiaffino, P., 2017. "Characterizing segregation in the Schelling–Voter model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 487(C), pages 125-142.
    19. Juan Miguel Benito & Pablo Branas-Garz & Penelope Hernandez & Juan A. Sanchis, 2011. "Strategic behavior in Schelling dynamics: A new result and experimental evidence," Working Papers 11-14, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
    20. Itzhak Benenson & Erez Hatna & Ehud Or, 2009. "From Schelling to Spatially Explicit Modeling of Urban Ethnic and Economic Residential Dynamics," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 37(4), pages 463-497, May.
    21. Zhiwei Cui & Yan-An Hwang, 2017. "House exchange and residential segregation in networks," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 46(1), pages 125-147, March.
    22. Zhang, Junfu, 2009. "Tipping and Residential Segregation: A Unified Schelling Model," IZA Discussion Papers 4413, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    23. Ioannides, Yannis M., 2004. "Neighborhood income distributions," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(3), pages 435-457, November.
    24. Melguizo Lopez, Isabel, 2022. "Group representation concerns and network formation," MPRA Paper 115172, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 08 May 2022.
    25. Florent Dubois & Christophe Muller, 2017. "Segregation and the Perception of the Minority," Working Papers halshs-01520308, HAL.
    26. Sheng Li & Kuo-Liang Chang & Lanlan Wang, 2020. "Racial residential segregation in multiple neighborhood markets: a dynamic sorting study," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 15(2), pages 363-383, April.
    27. Trevor Kollmann & Simone Marsiglio & Sandy Suardi & Marco Tolotti, 2021. "Social interactions, residential segregation and the dynamics of tipping," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 1355-1388, September.
    28. Juan Miguel Benito & Penélope Hernández, 2007. "Modelling Segregation Through Cellular Automata: A Theoretical Answer," Working Papers. Serie AD 2007-16, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
    29. Malone, Thom, 2020. "There goes the neighborhood does tipping exist amongst income groups?," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    30. Flaminio Squazzoni, 2010. "The impact of agent-based models in the social sciences after 15 years of incursions," History of Economic Ideas, Fabrizio Serra Editore, Pisa - Roma, vol. 18(2), pages 197-234.
    31. Caetano, Gregorio & Maheshri, Vikram, 2017. "School segregation and the identification of tipping behavior," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 115-135.
    32. Benito-Ostolaza, Juan M. & Brañas-Garza, Pablo & Hernández, Penélope & Sanchis-Llopis, Juan A., 2015. "Strategic behaviour in Schelling dynamics: Theory and experimental evidence," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 134-147.
    33. Banzhaf, H. Spencer & Walsh, Randall P., 2013. "Segregation and Tiebout sorting: The link between place-based investments and neighborhood tipping," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 83-98.
    34. Gabriele Ruoff & Gerald Schneider, 2006. "Segregation in the Classroom," Rationality and Society, , vol. 18(1), pages 95-117, February.
    35. Romans Pancs & Nicolaas J. Vriend, 2003. "Schelling's Spatial Proximity Model of Segregation Revisited," Working Papers 487, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
    36. Harting, Philipp & Radi, Davide, 2020. "Residential segregation: The role of inequality and housing subsidies," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 801-819.
    37. Daniel Richards, 2004. "Price Discrimination and the Long Boom," Discussion Papers Series, Department of Economics, Tufts University 0419, Department of Economics, Tufts University.
    38. Fernández-Huertas Moraga, Jesús & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, Ada & Saiz, Albert, 2019. "Immigrant locations and native residential preferences: Emerging ghettos or new communities?," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 133-151.
    39. Shaun P. Hargreaves Heap & Eugenio Levi & Abhijit Ramalingam, 2021. "Group identification and giving: in-group love, out-group hate and their crowding out," MUNI ECON Working Papers 2021-07, Masaryk University, revised Feb 2023.
    40. H. Spencer Banzhaf & Randall P. Walsh, 2010. "Segregation and Tiebout Sorting: Investigating the Link between Investments in Public Goods and Neighborhood Tipping," NBER Working Papers 16057, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    41. G. Pignataro & G. Prarolo, 2012. "One more in my backyard? Insights from the 2011 Italian nuclear referendum," Working Papers wp837, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    42. Antoni Rubi-Barcelo, 2013. "Categorical Segregation from a Game Theoretical Approach," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 14(1), pages 85-120, May.
    43. Bøg, Martin, 2007. "Is Segregation Robust?," MPRA Paper 8774, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    44. Philippe Collard, 2020. "Second-order micromotives and macrobehaviour," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 209-229, April.
    45. Philip Heidt & M. Taha Kasim, 2020. "The effects of highways on school segregation," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 99(5), pages 1261-1280, October.
    46. Giorgio Fagiolo & Marco Valente & Nicolaas J. Vriend, 2007. "Dynamic Models of Segregation in Small-World Networks," LEM Papers Series 2007/09, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    47. Sebastian Grauwin & Florence Goffette-Nagot & Pablo Jensen, 2010. "Dynamic models of residential segregation : an analytical solution," Working Papers 1017, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.
    48. Yiming Wang & Michelle Baddeley, 2016. "The problem of land value betterment: a simplified agent-based test," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 57(2), pages 413-436, November.
    49. Jean Louis Dessalles & Denis Phan, 2005. "Emergence in multi-agent systems:Cognitive hierarchy, detection, and complexity reduction," Computing in Economics and Finance 2005 257, Society for Computational Economics.
    50. Jiang, Ge, 2021. "Schelling’s model revisited: From segregation to integration," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    51. Boitier, Vincent & Auvray, Emmanuel, 2021. "Schelling paradox in a system of cities," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 68-88.
    52. Antonio Doria, Francisco, 2011. "J.B. Rosser Jr. , Handbook of Research on Complexity, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK--Northampton, MA, USA (2009) 436 + viii pp., index, ISBN 978 1 84542 089 5 (cased)," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 78(1-2), pages 196-204, April.
    53. Vinicius M. Netto & Maíra Soares Pinheiro & Roberto Paschoalino, 2015. "Segregated Networks in the City," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(6), pages 1084-1102, November.
    54. Sebastian Grauwin & Florence Goffette-Nagot & Pablo Jensen, 2009. "Dynamic models of residential segregation: Brief review, analytical resolution and study of the introduction of coordination," Working Papers 0914, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.
    55. Rennard, Jean-Philippe, 2006. "Artificiality in Social Sciences," MPRA Paper 1458, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    56. Riccardo Boero & Flaminio Squazzoni, 2005. "Does Empirical Embeddedness Matter? Methodological Issues on Agent-Based Models for Analytical Social Science," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 8(4), pages 1-6.
    57. Pablo Medina & Eric Goles & Roberto Zarama & Sergio Rica, 2017. "Self-Organized Societies: On the Sakoda Model of Social Interactions," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-16, January.
    58. Nicolaas J. Vriend, 2005. "ACE Models of Endogenous Interactions," Working Papers 542, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
    59. Laura Gardini & Davide Radi, 2018. "A piecewise smooth model of evolutionary game for residential mobility and segregation," Working Papers 1802, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Department of Economics, Society & Politics - Scientific Committee - L. Stefanini & G. Travaglini, revised 2018.
    60. Guifeng Su & Yi Zhang, 2023. "Significant suppression of segregation in Schelling’s metapopulation model with star-type underlying topology," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 96(7), pages 1-6, July.

Articles

  1. Nikandrova, Arina & Pancs, Romans, 2018. "Dynamic project selection," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 13(1), January.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  2. Nikandrova, Arina & Pancs, Romans, 2017. "Conjugate information disclosure in an auction with learning," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 174-212.

    Cited by:

    1. Terstiege, Stefan & Wasser, Cédric, 2020. "Buyer-optimal extensionproof information," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    2. Anton Kolotilin & Alexander Wolitzky, 2020. "Assortative Information Disclosure," Discussion Papers 2020-08, School of Economics, The University of New South Wales.
    3. Anton Kolotilin & Roberto Corrao & Alexander Wolitzky, 2022. "Persuasion with Non-Linear Preferences," Papers 2206.09164, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2022.
    4. Dworczak, Piotr & Kolotilin, Anton, 2024. "The persuasion duality," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 19(4), November.
    5. Chen, Yanlin & Hu, Audrey & Zhang, Jun, 2024. "Optimal auction design with aftermarket Cournot competition," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 54-65.

  3. Romans Pancs, 2015. "Efficient dark markets," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 59(3), pages 605-624, August.

    Cited by:

    1. Marta Faias & Jaime Luque, 2017. "Endogenous formation of security exchanges," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 64(2), pages 331-355, August.
    2. Jeremy Bertomeu & Davide Cianciaruso, 2018. "Verifiable disclosure," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 65(4), pages 1011-1044, June.

  4. Romans Pancs, 2014. "Designing Order-Book Transparency In Electronic Communication Networks," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 12(3), pages 702-723, June.

    Cited by:

    1. Rosar, Frank, 2017. "Test design under voluntary participation," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 632-655.
    2. William Fuchs & Aniko Ory & Andrzej Skrzypacz, 2015. "Transparency and Distressed Sales under Asymmetric Information," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1986, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    3. Chen, Yanlin & Hu, Audrey & Zhang, Jun, 2024. "Optimal auction design with aftermarket Cournot competition," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 54-65.

  5. Pancs, Romans, 2013. "Sequential negotiations with costly information acquisition," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 522-543.

    Cited by:

    1. Lester, Benjamin & Visschers, Ludo & Wolthoff, Ronald, 2015. "Dynamic Relational Contracts under Complete Information," SIRE Discussion Papers 2015-51, Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE).
    2. Benjamin Lester & Ludo Visschers & Ronald Wolthoff, 2014. "Competing with Asking Prices (first version)," Edinburgh School of Economics Discussion Paper Series 243, Edinburgh School of Economics, University of Edinburgh.
    3. Benjamin Lester & Ludo Visschers & Ronald Wolthoff, 2013. "Competing with asking prices," Working Papers 13-07, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
    4. Negin Golrezaei & Hamid Nazerzadeh, 2017. "Auctions with Dynamic Costly Information Acquisition," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(1), pages 130-144, February.
    5. Negin Golrezaei & Hamid Nazerzadeh, 2017. "Auctions with Dynamic Costly Information Acquisition," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(1), pages 130-144, February.
    6. McAdams, David, 2015. "On the benefits of dynamic bidding when participation is costly," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 959-972.

  6. Pancs, Romans & Vriend, Nicolaas J., 2007. "Schelling's spatial proximity model of segregation revisited," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(1-2), pages 1-24, February.
    See citations under working paper version above.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 6 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-URE: Urban and Real Estate Economics (3) 2003-01-19 2003-07-21 2003-10-20
  2. NEP-GTH: Game Theory (2) 2001-07-13 2003-01-19
  3. NEP-HPE: History and Philosophy of Economics (2) 2003-07-21 2015-07-11
  4. NEP-MIC: Microeconomics (2) 2015-07-11 2015-07-11
  5. NEP-CBE: Cognitive and Behavioural Economics (1) 2003-01-19
  6. NEP-CFN: Corporate Finance (1) 2015-07-11
  7. NEP-CTA: Contract Theory and Applications (1) 2015-07-11
  8. NEP-GEO: Economic Geography (1) 2003-07-21
  9. NEP-PPM: Project, Program and Portfolio Management (1) 2015-07-11

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Romans Pancs should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.