IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/ecr/col013/46956.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Employment Situation in Latin America and the Caribbean: Decent work for platform workers in Latin America

Editor

Listed:
  • ECLAC

Author

Listed:
  • -

Abstract

The crisis caused by the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic had severe repercussions on the region’s economy and labour markets in 2020. The year ended with a 7.1% decline in GDP, which translated into a sharp drop in employment and an increase in the unemployment rate, to 10.5%. Unlike in previous crises, withdrawal from the labour market was high, primarily in the second quarter of 2020, and the contraction in informal employment was greater than that of formal employment. With the gradual easing of lockdown measures, labour force participation has picked up and employment is recovering slowly, although the unemployment rate and levels of precariousness will remain high in 2021. The pandemic has highlighted the need for the inclusive use of new technologies to generate jobs. The second part of this report analyses the main characteristics of work on digital platforms, the impact of the pandemic on this type of work and some considerations for the design of appropriate regulatory frameworks.

Suggested Citation

  • -, 2021. "Employment Situation in Latin America and the Caribbean: Decent work for platform workers in Latin America," Coediciones, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 46956 edited by Eclac.
    • Handle: RePEc:ecr:col013:46956
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/46956
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. -, 2018. "Data, algorithms and policies: Redefining the digital world," Libros y Documentos Institucionales, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 43515 edited by Eclac, May.
    2. Hilbert, Martin R. & Lu, Kangbo, 2020. "The online job market trace in Latin America and the Caribbean," Documentos de Proyectos 45892, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    3. Johnston, Hannah & Land-Kazlauskas, Chris., 2018. "Organizing on-demand representation, voice, and collective bargaining in the gig economy," ILO Working Papers 994981993502676, International Labour Organization.
    4. Weller, Jürgen & Gómez Contreras, Matías & Martín Caballero, Angel & Ravest Tropa, Javiera, 2020. "El impacto de la crisis sanitaria del COVID-19 en los mercados laborales latinoamericanos," Documentos de Proyectos 45864, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Robles, Claudia & Rossel, Cecilia, 2022. "Social protection tools for coping with the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic: The Latin American experience," Documentos de Proyectos 47748, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    2. -, 2021. "Economic Survey of Latin America and the Caribbean 2021: Labour dynamics and employment policies for sustainable and inclusive recovery beyond the COVID-19 crisis," Estudio Económico de América Latina y el Caribe, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 47193 edited by Eclac.
    3. Abramo, Laís, 2022. "Policies to address the challenges of existing and new forms of informality in Latin America," Políticas Sociales 47774, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    4. -, 2021. "Disasters and inequality in a protracted crisis: Towards universal, comprehensive, resilient and sustainable social protection systems in Latin America and the Caribbean," Libros y Documentos Institucionales, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 47376 edited by Eclac, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Behl, Abhishek & Jayawardena, Nirma & Ishizaka, Alessio & Gupta, Manish & Shankar, Amit, 2022. "Gamification and gigification: A multidimensional theoretical approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1378-1393.
    2. Niki Panteli & Andriana Rapti & Dora Scholarios, 2020. "‘If He Just Knew Who We Were’: Microworkers’ Emerging Bonds of Attachment in a Fragmented Employment Relationship," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(3), pages 476-494, June.
    3. Gernot Grabher & Erwin van Tuijl, 2020. "Uber-production: From global networks to digital platforms," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(5), pages 1005-1016, August.
    4. Stenfors, Alexis & Susai, Masayuki, 2021. "Spoofing and pinging in foreign exchange markets," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    5. Ciotti, Fabrizio & Hornuf, Lars & Stenzhorn, Eliza, 2021. "Lock-In Effects in Online Labor Markets," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2021014, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    6. Marie Nilsen & Trond Kongsvik & Stian Antonsen, 2022. "Taming Proteus: Challenges for Risk Regulation of Powerful Digital Labor Platforms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-23, May.
    7. -, 2021. "Foreign Direct Investment in Latin America and the Caribbean 2021," La Inversión Extranjera Directa en América Latina y el Caribe, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 47148.2 edited by Eclac.
    8. Naudé, Wim, 2019. "Three Varieties of Africa’s Industrial Future," IZA Discussion Papers 12678, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    9. Stenfors, Alexis & Susai, Masayuki, 2019. "Liquidity withdrawal in the FX spot market: A cross-country study using high-frequency data," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 36-57.
    10. Carlo Vercellone & Francesco Brancaccio & Alfonso Giuliani & Federico Puletti & Giulia Rocchi & Pierluigi Vattimo, 2018. "Data-driven disruptive commons-based models," Working Papers halshs-01952141, HAL.
    11. Berde, Éva, 2018. "Uber és taxi egymás mellett - új piaci modellek hagyományos árdiszkriminációval [Uber and taxi firms side by side. The Ublyft" business model with traditional price discrimination]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(6), pages 650-666.
    12. Elena M Auer & Tara S Behrend & Andrew B Collmus & Richard N Landers & Ahleah F Miles, 2021. "Pay for performance, satisfaction and retention in longitudinal crowdsourced research," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, January.
    13. Serpil ÇİĞDEM, 2019. "Endüstri 4.0 ve Dijital Emek Platformlarının İnsana Yakışır İş Bağlamında Değerlendirilmesi," Journal of Social Policy Conferences, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 0(77), pages 157-199, December.
    14. Jose Carlos Saavedra & Pablo Lavado & Sebastián Lindley & Liz Villegas, 2021. "Impacto de las medidas para la mitigación de la Covid - 19 en la Salud y en la Economía para Latinoamérica y Perú," Working Papers 181, Peruvian Economic Association.
    15. Wim Naudé, 2019. "New Technology, Entrepreneurship and the Revival of Manufacturing in Africa: Opportunities for Youth and Women?," Working Papers idrcdpru4ir, University of Cape Town, Development Policy Research Unit.
    16. Baptista, Dulce & Freund, Richard & Novella, Rafael, 2023. "Entrepreneurial skills training for online freelancing: Experimental evidence from Haiti," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    17. Johannes Reinhard Többen & Martin Distelkamp & Britta Stöver & Saskia Reuschel & Lara Ahmann & Christian Lutz, 2022. "Global Land Use Impacts of Bioeconomy: An Econometric Input–Output Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-24, February.
    18. Rani Uma & Furrer Marianne, 2019. "On-Demand Digital Economy: Can Experience Ensure Work and Income Security for Microtask Workers?," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 239(3), pages 565-597, June.
    19. Gali Racabi, 2021. "Effects of City–State Relations on Labor Relations: The Case of Uber," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 74(5), pages 1155-1178, October.
    20. Alex Veen & Tom Barratt & Caleb Goods, 2020. "Platform-Capital’s ‘App-etite’ for Control: A Labour Process Analysis of Food-Delivery Work in Australia," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(3), pages 388-406, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecr:col013:46956. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Biblioteca CEPAL (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eclaccl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.