IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zag/market/v32y2020isip83-97.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumer Attitudes Towards Social Network Advertising: Predictors and Outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Ivana Kursan Milaković

    (University of Split, Faculty of Economics, Business and Tourism)

  • Mirela Mihić

    (University of Split, Faculty of Economics, Business and Tourism)

  • Ivana Boljat

    (University of Split, Faculty of Economics, Business and Tourism)

Abstract

Purpose – This study explores the impact of perceived trust, search for novelty and perceived usefulness on consumer attitudes towards social network advertising, and the impact of those attitudes on buying intention, buying and word-of-mouth information spread. Design/Methodology/Approach – The research included convenience sample of 265 respondents. Online survey distributed through Facebook and Instagram was used as a research method. The data was analysed using a multiple regression analysis. Findings and implications – The results show that positive attitudes towards social network advertising depend on perceived trust and usefulness. The impact of the search for novelty on consumer attitudes towards social network advertising proved to be insignificant. Furthermore, buying intention, buying and disseminating information by word-of-mouth represent relevant outcomes of consumer attitudes towards social network advertising. This research has implications for companies in terms of a better understanding of the relevant predictors and outcomes of consumer attitudes in on-line advertising context. Managers can also benefit from the findings when creating successful communication strategies. Limitations – A major research limitation is the use of non-probability convenience sample that did not capture the population as a whole. Therefore, this may be regarded as a future research direction. Originality – This study sheds new light on relevant predictors and outcomes of consumer attitudes towards social network advertising, which was not previously researched from the proposed framework perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Ivana Kursan Milaković & Mirela Mihić & Ivana Boljat, 2020. "Consumer Attitudes Towards Social Network Advertising: Predictors and Outcomes," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 32(SI), pages 83-97.
    • Handle: RePEc:zag:market:v:32:y:2020:i:si:p:83-97
    DOI: 10.22598/mt/2020.32.spec-issue.83
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.22598/mt/2020.32.spec-issue.83
    Download Restriction: None
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22598/mt/2020.32.spec-issue.83?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Priyanka Surendran, 2012. "Technology Acceptance Model: A Survey of Literature," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 2(4), pages 175-178, August.
    2. Pappas, Nikolaos, 2016. "Marketing strategies, perceived risks, and consumer trust in online buying behaviour," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 92-103.
    3. Hirschman, Elizabeth C, 1980. "Innovativeness, Novelty Seeking, and Consumer Creativity," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 7(3), pages 283-295, December.
    4. Tran, Trang P., 2017. "Personalized ads on Facebook: An effective marketing tool for online marketers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 230-242.
    5. Assaker, Guy & Vinzi, Vincenzo Esposito & O’Connor, Peter, 2011. "Examining the effect of novelty seeking, satisfaction, and destination image on tourists’ return pattern: A two factor, non-linear latent growth model," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 890-901.
    6. Priyanka Surendran, 2012. "Technology Acceptance Model: A Survey of Literature," International Journal of Business and Social Research, LAR Center Press, vol. 2(4), pages 175-178, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wen-Shin Huang & Cheng-Jhen Lee & Han-Shen Chen, 2022. "The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility on Consumer Purchase Intention toward Environmentally Friendly Sneakers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohammad Reza Asadi Zarch & Sarasadat Makian & Mohammad Najjarzadeh, 2023. "Multidimensional interdisciplinary variables influencing tourist online purchasing intention at World Heritage City (City of Yazd, Iran)," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Sanduni I. Senaratne & Samantha M. Samarasinghe, 2019. "Factors Affecting the Intention to Adopt M-Learning," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(2), pages 150-164, February.
    3. Ernest Osei & PETER KWASI OPPONG, 2020. "The Role of Computer Education in the Behavioral Intentions to Use Information Technology in Hospitals in Kumasi, Ghana," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 12(4), pages 13-22.
    4. Mohammadbashir Sedighi & Hamideh Parsaeiyan & Yashar Araghi, 2021. "An Empirical Study of Intention to Continue Using of Digital Ride-hailing Platforms," The Review of Socionetwork Strategies, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 489-515, November.
    5. Shafiqul Islam & Mohammad Fakhrul Islam & Noor-E- Zannat, 2023. "Behavioral Intention to Use Online for Shopping in Bangladesh: A Technology Acceptance Model Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, September.
    6. Nurul Nadia Abd Aziz & Normilia Abd Wahid, 2018. "Factors Influencing Online Purchase Intention among University Students," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 8(7), pages 702-717, July.
    7. Ahmad Althunibat & Muhammad Binsawad & Mohammed Amin Almaiah & Omar Almomani & Adeeb Alsaaidah & Waleed Al-Rahmi & Mohamed Elhassan Seliaman, 2021. "Sustainable Applications of Smart-Government Services: A Model to Understand Smart-Government Adoption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-28, March.
    8. Jeremiah Kau Makokoane & Docter Joe Khosa, 2021. "Applying UTAUT and Fuzzy Dematel Methods: A New Legal Aid Administration System," International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 8(1), pages 24-36, November.
    9. Tai Abdulrahman Alshammari & Khalid Mhasan Alshammary & Fahad Maiyah Alshammari, 2022. "Impact of Perceived Quality of E-Health Services on Patient Behavioral Intention to Use E-Health Services: A Moderating Role of Knowledge of E-Health Management," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 14(1), pages 23-38.
    10. Kimiagari, Salman & Asadi Malafe, Neda Sharifi, 2021. "The role of cognitive and affective responses in the relationship between internal and external stimuli on online impulse buying behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    11. Anuja Shukla & Shiv Kumar Sharma, 2018. "Evaluating Consumers’ Adoption of Mobile Technology for Grocery Shopping: An Application of Technology Acceptance Model," Vision, , vol. 22(2), pages 185-198, June.
    12. Jimin Shim & Joonho Moon & Myungkeun Song & Won Seok Lee, 2021. "Antecedents of Purchase Intention at Starbucks in the Context of Covid-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, February.
    13. Daojun Zhong & Tengfei Lyu, 2022. "Implementation of supply chain management practices and its effect on textile firm's performance at China: A mediation analysis," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 2515-2528, September.
    14. Olga Sideri & Michalis Papoutsidakis & Theodore Lilas & Nikitas Nikitakos & Dimitrios Papachristos, 2021. "Green shipping onboard: acceptance, diffusion & adoption of LNG and electricity as alternative fuels in Greece," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-29, December.
    15. Kirsi Kotilainen & Ulla A. Saari, 2018. "Policy Influence on Consumers’ Evolution into Prosumers—Empirical Findings from an Exploratory Survey in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, January.
    16. Siahaan, Andysah Putera Utama & Nasution, Muhammad Dharma Tuah Putra, 2018. "Online Shoppers Acceptance An Exploratory Study," INA-Rxiv 4hs6x, Center for Open Science.
    17. Lestari, Diyan, 2019. "Measuring e-commerce adoption behaviour among gen-Z in Jakarta, Indonesia," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 103-115.
    18. Dirsehan, Taşkın & Cankat, Ece, 2021. "Role of mobile food-ordering applications in developing restaurants’ brand satisfaction and loyalty in the pandemic period," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    19. Xin Yi Chan & Muhammad Khalilur Rahman & Abdullah Al Mamun & Anas A. Salameh & Wan Mohd Hirwani Wan Hussain & Syed Shah Alam, 2022. "Predicting the Intention and Adoption of Mobile Shopping During the COVID-19 Lockdown in Malaysia," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    20. M. Nazmul Islam & Fumitaka Furuoka & Aida Idris, 2021. "Influence of Gender Diversity on Employee Work Engagement in the Context of Organizational Change: Evidence From Bangladeshi Employees," International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management (IJABIM), IGI Global, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zag:market:v:32:y:2020:i:si:p:83-97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tanja Komarac (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fefzghr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.