IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v33y2013i11p2041-2055.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Expected Consequence Approach to Route Choice in the Maritime Transportation of Crude Oil

Author

Listed:
  • Atiq Siddiqui
  • Manish Verma

Abstract

Maritime transportation is the major conduit of international trade, and the primary link for global crude oil movement. Given the volume of oil transported on international maritime links, it is not surprising that oil spills of both minor and major types result, although most of the risk‐related work has been confined to the local settings. We propose an expected consequence approach for assessing oil‐spill risk from intercontinental transportation of crude oil that not only adheres to the safety guidelines specified by the International Maritime Organization but also outlines a novel technique that makes use of coarse global data to estimate accident probabilities. The proposed estimation technique, together with four of the most popular cost‐of‐spill models from the literature, were applied to study and analyze a realistic size problem instance. Numerical analyses showed that: a shorter route may not necessarily be less risky; an understanding of the inherent oil‐spill risk of different routes could potentially facilitate tanker routing decisions; and the associated negotiations over insurance premium between the transport company and the not‐for‐profit prevention and indemnity clubs. Finally, we note that only the linear model should be used with one of the three nonlinear cost‐of‐spill models for evaluating tanker routes.

Suggested Citation

  • Atiq Siddiqui & Manish Verma, 2013. "An Expected Consequence Approach to Route Choice in the Maritime Transportation of Crude Oil," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(11), pages 2041-2055, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:33:y:2013:i:11:p:2041-2055
    DOI: 10.1111/risa.12049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12049
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/risa.12049?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas R. Stewart & Thomas M. Leschine, 1986. "Judgment and Analysis in Oil Spill Risk Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(3), pages 305-315, September.
    2. Timothy G. Fowler & Eirik Sørgård, 2000. "Modeling Ship Transportation Risk," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2), pages 225-244, April.
    3. Erhan Erkut & Armann Ingolfsson, 2000. "Catastrophe Avoidance Models for Hazardous Materials Route Planning," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 165-179, May.
    4. Erhan Erkut & Vedat Verter, 1998. "Modeling of Transport Risk for Hazardous Materials," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(5), pages 625-642, October.
    5. Marcelo Ramos Martins & Marcos Coelho Maturana, 2010. "Human Error Contribution in Collision and Grounding of Oil Tankers," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 674-698, April.
    6. Hu, Shenping & Fang, Quangen & Xia, Haibo & Xi, Yongtao, 2007. "Formal safety assessment based on relative risks model in ship navigation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(3), pages 369-377.
    7. Goerlandt, Floris & Kujala, Pentti, 2011. "Traffic simulation based ship collision probability modeling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 91-107.
    8. Lauro J. Martinez & James H. Lambert, 2010. "Prioritising sources of risk at liquefied natural gas storage terminals in Mexico," International Journal of Business Continuity and Risk Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(4), pages 363-383.
    9. Montewka, Jakub & Hinz, Tomasz & Kujala, Pentti & Matusiak, Jerzy, 2010. "Probability modelling of vessel collisions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(5), pages 573-589.
    10. Özgecan S. Ulusçu & Birnur Özbaş & Tayfur Altıok & İlhan Or, 2009. "Risk Analysis of the Vessel Traffic in the Strait of Istanbul," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(10), pages 1454-1472, October.
    11. Vanem, Erik & Antão, Pedro & Østvik, Ivan & de Comas, Francisco Del Castillo, 2008. "Analysing the risk of LNG carrier operations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(9), pages 1328-1344.
    12. Eleftherios Iakovou & Christos Douligeris & Huan Li & Chi Ip & Lalit Yudhbir, 1999. "A Maritime Global Route Planning Model for Hazardous Materials Transportation," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 34-48, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kumar, Sourabh & Kumar Barua, Mukesh, 2022. "Modeling and investigating the interaction among risk factors of the sustainable petroleum supply chain," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    2. Wang, Shuang & Wallace, Stein W. & Lu, Jing & Gu, Yewen, 2020. "Handling financial risks in crude oil imports: Taking into account crude oil prices as well as country and transportation risks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    3. Hu, Jun & Zhang, Yujie & Wu, Peng & Li, Huijia, 2022. "An analysis of the global fuel-trading market based on the visibility graph approach," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    4. Yuzhakov, Vladimir (Южаков, Владимир) & Startsev, Y (Старцев, Я.), 2015. "Development of a Concept of an Interdisciplinary Research Program of Formation of Complex Methodologies and Techniques of Management Development in Public Administration [Разработка Концепции Межди," Published Papers mn37, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    5. Ditta, A. & Figueroa, O. & Galindo, G. & Yie-Pinedo, R., 2019. "A review on research in transportation of hazardous materials," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    6. Ali Jamshidi & Shahrzad Faghih‐Roohi & Siamak Hajizadeh & Alfredo Núñez & Robert Babuska & Rolf Dollevoet & Zili Li & Bart De Schutter, 2017. "A Big Data Analysis Approach for Rail Failure Risk Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(8), pages 1495-1507, August.
    7. Lam, C.Y. & Cruz, A.M., 2019. "Risk analysis for consumer-level utility gas and liquefied petroleum gas incidents using probabilistic network modeling: A case study of gas incidents in Japan," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 198-212.
    8. Kumar, Sourabh & Barua, Mukesh Kumar, 2022. "A modeling framework and analysis of challenges faced by the Indian petroleum supply chain," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gino J. Lim & Jaeyoung Cho & Selim Bora & Taofeek Biobaku & Hamid Parsaei, 2018. "Models and computational algorithms for maritime risk analysis: a review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(2), pages 765-786, December.
    2. J Montewka & P Krata & F Goerlandt & A Mazaheri & P Kujala, 2011. "Marine traffic risk modelling – an innovative approach and a case study," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 225(3), pages 307-322, September.
    3. Carine Dominguez-Péry & Lakshmi Narasimha Raju Vuddaraju & Isabelle Corbett-Etchevers & Rana Tassabehji, 2021. "Reducing maritime accidents in ships by tackling human error: a bibliometric review and research agenda," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-32, December.
    4. Suyi Li & Qiang Meng & Xiaobo Qu, 2012. "An Overview of Maritime Waterway Quantitative Risk Assessment Models," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(3), pages 496-512, March.
    5. Goerlandt, Floris & Montewka, Jakub, 2015. "Maritime transportation risk analysis: Review and analysis in light of some foundational issues," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 115-134.
    6. Szlapczynski, Rafal & Szlapczynska, Joanna, 2021. "A ship domain-based model of collision risk for near-miss detection and Collision Alert Systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    7. Zhang, Mingyang & Montewka, Jakub & Manderbacka, Teemu & Kujala, Pentti & Hirdaris, Spyros, 2021. "A Big Data Analytics Method for the Evaluation of Ship - Ship Collision Risk reflecting Hydrometeorological Conditions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    8. Maria Hänninen & Arsham Mazaheri & Pentti Kujala & Jakub Montewka & Pekka Laaksonen & Maija Salmiovirta & Mikko Klang, 2014. "Expert elicitation of a navigation service implementation effects on ship groundings and collisions in the Gulf of Finland," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 228(1), pages 19-28, February.
    9. Mohri, Seyed Sina & Mohammadi, Mehrdad & Gendreau, Michel & Pirayesh, Amir & Ghasemaghaei, Ali & Salehi, Vahid, 2022. "Hazardous material transportation problems: A comprehensive overview of models and solution approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(1), pages 1-38.
    10. P. Daniel Wright & Matthew J. Liberatore & Robert L. Nydick, 2006. "A Survey of Operations Research Models and Applications in Homeland Security," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 36(6), pages 514-529, December.
    11. Jason R. W. Merrick & Claire A. Dorsey & Bo Wang & Martha Grabowski & John R. Harrald, 2022. "Measuring Prediction Accuracy in a Maritime Accident Warning System," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(2), pages 819-827, February.
    12. Cai, Mingyou & Zhang, Jinfen & Zhang, Di & Yuan, Xiaoli & Soares, C. Guedes, 2021. "Collision risk analysis on ferry ships in Jiangsu Section of the Yangtze River based on AIS data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    13. Amirsaman Kheirkhah & HamidReza Navidi & Masume Messi Bidgoli, 2016. "A bi-level network interdiction model for solving the hazmat routing problem," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(2), pages 459-471, January.
    14. Tsung-Sheng Chang & Linda K. Nozick & Mark A. Turnquist, 2005. "Multiobjective Path Finding in Stochastic Dynamic Networks, with Application to Routing Hazardous Materials Shipments," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(3), pages 383-399, August.
    15. Fontaine, Pirmin & Crainic, Teodor Gabriel & Gendreau, Michel & Minner, Stefan, 2020. "Population-based risk equilibration for the multimode hazmat transport network design problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(1), pages 188-200.
    16. Yingying Kang & Rajan Batta & Changhyun Kwon, 2014. "Value-at-Risk model for hazardous material transportation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 222(1), pages 361-387, November.
    17. Hosseini, S. Davod & Verma, Manish, 2018. "Conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) methodology to optimal train configuration and routing of rail hazmat shipments," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 79-103.
    18. Iliopoulou, Christina & Kepaptsoglou, Konstantinos & Schinas, Orestis, 2018. "Energy supply security for the Aegean islands: A routing model with risk and environmental considerations," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 608-620.
    19. Kumar, Anand & Roy, Debjit & Verter, Vedat & Sharma, Dheeraj, 2018. "Integrated fleet mix and routing decision for hazmat transportation: A developing country perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(1), pages 225-238.
    20. Zhang, Weibin & Feng, Xinyu & Goerlandt, Floris & Liu, Qing, 2020. "Towards a Convolutional Neural Network model for classifying regional ship collision risk levels for waterway risk analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:33:y:2013:i:11:p:2041-2055. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.