IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i23-24p4447-4459.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experiences of the older hospitalised person on nursing pain care: An ethnographic insight

Author

Listed:
  • Joanne Harmon
  • Peter Summons
  • Isabel Higgins

Abstract

Aims and objectives To present an ethnographic insight into the older hospitalised person (those aged over 65 years) perceptions and experiences of pain care provision by nurses in acute care. Background Pain care provision by nurses remains less than optimal for the older hospitalised person despite numerous evidence‐based guidelines. There is a paucity of research providing input from the experiences of the older hospitalised person in relation to their perspectives of pain care provision by nurses in acute care. Pain care research needs more involvement from those older persons with documented diagnoses of dementia, delirium or cognitive impairment, and intellectual disabilities and those in their end stage of palliation. Design A focused ethnographic study. The consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) were used to report the findings of this study. Methods A focused ethnographic study was conducted in 8 acute care units within 2 large tertiary referral hospitals on the east coast of Australia. Consisting of semi‐structured interviews (n = 12) of cognitively intact older persons (11 hr). Twenty‐three (23) semi‐structured interviews with nine (9) RN participants (12 hr and 38 min). Participant observation period totalled 1,041 hr. Results The older persons’ experiences of receiving pain care were based on a formulaic assessment process focusing on intensity of pain and pain management options provided often lacked their input. The older persons often did not perceive their pain care provision as being of benefit to themselves. The nurses lacked insight and understanding on the nature of pain for the older person. Conclusion Understanding was gained into how the older persons’ pain care was hampered due to the lack of appropriate, and meaningful pain care provision and provides insight into why the older hospitalised person continues to experience a less than optimal experience. Relevance to clinical practice Older hospitalised persons can gain continuity of pain care when nurses negotiate with them to repattern or restructure their nursing routines for pain care provision. Older people need inclusion into pain care decisions. All vulnerable older persons require nurses to use an evidence‐based pain assessment tool.

Suggested Citation

  • Joanne Harmon & Peter Summons & Isabel Higgins, 2019. "Experiences of the older hospitalised person on nursing pain care: An ethnographic insight," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(23-24), pages 4447-4459, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:23-24:p:4447-4459
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15029
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Imelda Dillane & Owen Doody, 2019. "Nursing people with intellectual disability and dementia experiencing pain: An integrative review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(13-14), pages 2472-2485, July.
    2. Megan Dickson & Helen Riddell & Fiona Gilmour & Brendan McCormack, 2017. "Delivering dignified care: A realist synthesis of evidence that promotes effective listening to and learning from older people's feedback in acute care settings," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4028-4038, December.
    3. Jane McKeown & Amanda Clarke & Christine Ingleton & Julie Repper, 2010. "Actively involving people with dementia in qualitative research," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(13‐14), pages 1935-1943, July.
    4. Maud Joelsson & Lars‐Eric Olsson & Eva Jakobsson, 2010. "Patients’ experience of pain and pain relief following hip replacement surgery," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(19‐20), pages 2832-2838, October.
    5. Alfhild Dihle & Gunnar Bjølseth & Sølvi Helseth, 2006. "The gap between saying and doing in postoperative pain management," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 469-479, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kirsten Kaptain & Vibeke Bregnballe & Pia Dreyer, 2017. "Patient participation in postoperative pain assessment after spine surgery in a recovery unit," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(19-20), pages 2986-2994, October.
    2. Hanna‐Mari Pesonen & Anne M. Remes & Arja Isola, 2013. "Diagnosis of dementia as a turning point among Finnish families: A qualitative study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 489-496, December.
    3. Sturge, Jodi & Klaassens, Mirjam & Lager, Debbie & Weitkamp, Gerd & Vegter, Daan & Meijering, Louise, 2021. "Using the concept of activity space to understand the social health of older adults living with memory problems and dementia at home," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    4. Michele Board & Brendan McCormack, 2018. "Exploring the meaning of home and its implications for the care of older people," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(15-16), pages 3070-3080, August.
    5. Kay Shannon & Kasia Bail & Stephen Neville, 2019. "Dementia‐friendly community initiatives: An integrative review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(11-12), pages 2035-2045, June.
    6. Robin Digby & Susan Lee & Allison Williams, 2016. "Interviewing people with dementia in hospital: recommendations for researchers," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(7-8), pages 1156-1165, April.
    7. Eva Angelini & Adad Baranto & Helena Brisby & Helle Wijk, 2020. "Healthcare practitioners’ experiences of postoperative pain management in lumbar spine surgery care—A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(9-10), pages 1662-1672, May.
    8. Anna‐Clara Rullander & Mats Lundström & Marie Lindkvist & Bruno Hägglöf & Viveca Lindh, 2016. "Stress symptoms among adolescents before and after scoliosis surgery: correlations with postoperative pain," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(7-8), pages 1086-1094, April.
    9. Kirsten Specht & Per Kjaersgaard‐Andersen & Birthe D Pedersen, 2016. "Patient experience in fast‐track hip and knee arthroplasty – a qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5-6), pages 836-845, March.
    10. Nina Hynninen & Reetta Saarnio & Arja Isola, 2015. "Treatment of older people with dementia in surgical wards from the viewpoints of the patients and close relatives," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(23-24), pages 3691-3699, December.
    11. Mohammed Ali Mohammed Kasasbeh & Catherine McCabe & Sheila Payne, 2017. "Action learning: an effective way to improve cancer‐related pain management," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(21-22), pages 3430-3441, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:23-24:p:4447-4459. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.