IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v15y2006i4p469-479.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The gap between saying and doing in postoperative pain management

Author

Listed:
  • Alfhild Dihle
  • Gunnar Bjølseth
  • Sølvi Helseth

Abstract

Aim. To understand how nurses contribute to postoperative pain management in a surgical setting and to identify barriers to achieving optimal postoperative pain alleviation. Background. Postoperative pain is inadequately managed. Nurses play an important role in assessment, treatment and evaluation of postoperative pain in surgical wards, but combined observational and interview studies about how they approach these activities have rarely been undertaken. Design and methods. The study design is descriptive. Observations and in‐depth interviews were conducted with nine nurses on three surgical wards at two hospitals. Each nurse was observed during five shifts, day and night, and interviewed after the final observation. The collection and analysis of data followed principles of qualitative research. Findings. One main theme emerged about the nurses’ approach to postoperative pain management: a discrepancy between what the nurses said they did and what they actually did. Conclusion. The study revealed a gap between what nurses said and did in postoperative pain management, and this gap was smaller when the nurses took an active approach. An active approach towards patients about postoperative pain seemed to enhance pain alleviation. Relevance to clinical practice. Nursing education and practice both need to promote knowledge of pain and pain management, as well as empathy and empathic communication in relation to pain. They need to collaborate in guiding nurses to act in accord with theoretical knowledge and so enhance competence in nursing actions related to postoperative pain management.

Suggested Citation

  • Alfhild Dihle & Gunnar Bjølseth & Sølvi Helseth, 2006. "The gap between saying and doing in postoperative pain management," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 469-479, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:15:y:2006:i:4:p:469-479
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01272.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01272.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01272.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohammed Ali Mohammed Kasasbeh & Catherine McCabe & Sheila Payne, 2017. "Action learning: an effective way to improve cancer‐related pain management," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(21-22), pages 3430-3441, November.
    2. Anna‐Clara Rullander & Mats Lundström & Marie Lindkvist & Bruno Hägglöf & Viveca Lindh, 2016. "Stress symptoms among adolescents before and after scoliosis surgery: correlations with postoperative pain," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(7-8), pages 1086-1094, April.
    3. Joanne Harmon & Peter Summons & Isabel Higgins, 2019. "Experiences of the older hospitalised person on nursing pain care: An ethnographic insight," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(23-24), pages 4447-4459, December.
    4. Kirsten Kaptain & Vibeke Bregnballe & Pia Dreyer, 2017. "Patient participation in postoperative pain assessment after spine surgery in a recovery unit," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(19-20), pages 2986-2994, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:15:y:2006:i:4:p:469-479. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.