IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i19-20p2832-2838.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patients’ experience of pain and pain relief following hip replacement surgery

Author

Listed:
  • Maud Joelsson
  • Lars‐Eric Olsson
  • Eva Jakobsson

Abstract

Aims. The aim of this study was to describe patients’ experience of pain and pain relief following hip replacement surgery. Background. Annually, many patients undergo hip replacement surgery. Previous research has focused largely on the long‐term effects on pain for patients who undergo hip replacement surgery and to a lesser degree on their subjective, early postoperative pain experience. Design. A descriptive qualitative design was used. Methods. The study was carried out in an orthopaedic ward at a hospital in Sweden during 2006. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 15 patients who had undergone hip replacement surgery. Data were analysed by means of qualitative content analysis. Results. The postoperative pain experience was characterised in terms of interrelated contexts of time, various bodily activities and postoperative pain intensity. The postoperative pain intensity was characterised in terms of intensive and worst imaginable, strange feelings and fear and a feeling of faintness. Easing of postoperative pain was related to professional care features, such as nursing staff, pharmacological pain relief and technical aids. Self‐care features were related to relieving body positions, endurance and looking ahead. Conclusion. Although the development of total hip replacement surgery has been very successful, there are issues that need to be addressed in relation to postoperative pain management. The findings in this study show that there are reasons for making a more concerted effort to develop postoperative pain management, particularly during the first few days after surgery. Relevance to clinical practice. The results provide some indication that pain management for this group of patients in the early postoperative period needs to be improved to reduce the fear of moving and improve the process of regaining independence. Devoting more attention to the patients during the initial postoperative phase may be the key to improve the training and making it even more effective.

Suggested Citation

  • Maud Joelsson & Lars‐Eric Olsson & Eva Jakobsson, 2010. "Patients’ experience of pain and pain relief following hip replacement surgery," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(19‐20), pages 2832-2838, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:19-20:p:2832-2838
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03215.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03215.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03215.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joanne Harmon & Peter Summons & Isabel Higgins, 2019. "Experiences of the older hospitalised person on nursing pain care: An ethnographic insight," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(23-24), pages 4447-4459, December.
    2. Kirsten Kaptain & Vibeke Bregnballe & Pia Dreyer, 2017. "Patient participation in postoperative pain assessment after spine surgery in a recovery unit," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(19-20), pages 2986-2994, October.
    3. Kirsten Specht & Per Kjaersgaard‐Andersen & Birthe D Pedersen, 2016. "Patient experience in fast‐track hip and knee arthroplasty – a qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5-6), pages 836-845, March.
    4. Eva Angelini & Adad Baranto & Helena Brisby & Helle Wijk, 2020. "Healthcare practitioners’ experiences of postoperative pain management in lumbar spine surgery care—A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(9-10), pages 1662-1672, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:19-20:p:2832-2838. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.