IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i19-20p2986-2994.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patient participation in postoperative pain assessment after spine surgery in a recovery unit

Author

Listed:
  • Kirsten Kaptain
  • Vibeke Bregnballe
  • Pia Dreyer

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore how patients undergoing spine surgery participated in postoperative pain assessment in a recovery unit. Background Despite advances in medicine, pharmaceutical and technical knowledge, patients report considerable postoperative pain after spine surgery. Research shows that patients require efficient individual pain treatment and that their participation has a positive effect on pain treatment. Design This study was based on a phenomenological hermeneutic design. Methods Fifteen qualitative interviews were conducted in 2014. Meaning condensation was used to analyse data. Results Three themes emerged: (1) communication and knowledge; anaesthesia, analgesics and severe pain affected patients’ ability to assess and communicate their pain. (2) Pain assessment using a numerical rating scale; this theme was characterised by individual differences in rating perception. Also, new postoperative pain sensations were described as different kinds of pain and variation in the pain intensity during activity. (3) Patient–nurse relationship; this theme was characterised by reports of frequent and direct contact on the part of the nurses about pain assessment. Patients’ lack of knowledge about pain treatment resulted in inactivity and uncertainty of when to ask for analgesics. Conclusion This study indicates that nurses and patients would benefit from building a mutual understanding of pain perceptions and numerical rating scale as this would pave the way for a more accurate pain assessment. Patients’ ability to participate in pain assessment was affected by anaesthesia, analgesics and severe pain. Patients needed knowledge about complications and needed to understand when they should ask for analgesics. Relevance to clinical practice Results indicate that patient perceptions of numerical rating scale and variation in patients’ ability to communicate in the initial postoperative period should be given more attention to underpin patients’ pain assessment. This may be a key factor in ensuring patient participation in pain assessment and thereby improving postoperative pain management.

Suggested Citation

  • Kirsten Kaptain & Vibeke Bregnballe & Pia Dreyer, 2017. "Patient participation in postoperative pain assessment after spine surgery in a recovery unit," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(19-20), pages 2986-2994, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:19-20:p:2986-2994
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13640
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13640
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13640?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maud Joelsson & Lars‐Eric Olsson & Eva Jakobsson, 2010. "Patients’ experience of pain and pain relief following hip replacement surgery," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(19‐20), pages 2832-2838, October.
    2. Alfhild Dihle & Gunnar Bjølseth & Sølvi Helseth, 2006. "The gap between saying and doing in postoperative pain management," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 469-479, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yu'E Yang & Chang Xiong & Ling Xia & Si Si Kang & Jin Jin Jian & Xue Qing Yang & Ling Chen & Yuan Wang & Jin Jin Yu & Xi Zhong Xu, 2020. "Consistency of postoperative pain assessments between nurses and patients undergoing enhanced recovery after gynaecological surgery," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(7-8), pages 1323-1331, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joanne Harmon & Peter Summons & Isabel Higgins, 2019. "Experiences of the older hospitalised person on nursing pain care: An ethnographic insight," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(23-24), pages 4447-4459, December.
    2. Eva Angelini & Adad Baranto & Helena Brisby & Helle Wijk, 2020. "Healthcare practitioners’ experiences of postoperative pain management in lumbar spine surgery care—A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(9-10), pages 1662-1672, May.
    3. Anna‐Clara Rullander & Mats Lundström & Marie Lindkvist & Bruno Hägglöf & Viveca Lindh, 2016. "Stress symptoms among adolescents before and after scoliosis surgery: correlations with postoperative pain," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(7-8), pages 1086-1094, April.
    4. Kirsten Specht & Per Kjaersgaard‐Andersen & Birthe D Pedersen, 2016. "Patient experience in fast‐track hip and knee arthroplasty – a qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5-6), pages 836-845, March.
    5. Mohammed Ali Mohammed Kasasbeh & Catherine McCabe & Sheila Payne, 2017. "Action learning: an effective way to improve cancer‐related pain management," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(21-22), pages 3430-3441, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:19-20:p:2986-2994. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.